SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

A True 1C

Créé par: Oilers4Days
Équipe: 2021-22 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 4 juill. 2021
Publié: 4 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The Habs are built to be a playoff team.

They just lack 1 thing. A true 1C. They need a 1C. Which is why I think Eichel would be a good fit.

Explanation on the Danault signing. This is like the RNH signing. Give term and 5M.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
85 250 000 $
1750 000 $
1850 000 $
43 475 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
MTL
  1. Eichel, Jack
Détails additionnels:
We know how much the Sabres love this years draft, as their GM literally said he wants as many picks in the 1st round as he can this year.
BUF
  1. Anderson, Josh
  2. Guhle, Kaiden
  3. Khisamutdinov, Arsen
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (MTL)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (MTL)
  6. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (MTL)
Détails additionnels:
2 great prospects going to Buffalo. These guys really have potential.


And Josh Anderson is a really good power forward.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de WSH
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
Logo de VGK
Logo de PHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $70 745 120 $597 561 $1 475 000 $10 754 880 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
C
UFA - 1
850 000 $850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 343 750 $2 343 750 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
G
UFA - 2
3 475 000 $3 475 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 juill. 2021 à 11 h 5
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 85
Mentions "j'aime": 20
Kk?
Oilers4Days a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2021 à 11 h 5
#2
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
So youre scrapping Kotk?
Oilers4Days a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2021 à 11 h 6
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,133
Mentions "j'aime": 14,147
He literally said that? Provide the quote
4 juill. 2021 à 11 h 8
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,487
Mentions "j'aime": 317
I would stay away from Eichel. With his neck issue you never know how that will turn out Will the rehab work? will he need surgery? how will the surgery turn out?
Campabee et Oilers4Days a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2021 à 11 h 9
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 7,864
Mentions "j'aime": 4,120
I know nobody will like my comment, but there is no way that you are getting a top 10 center man without making the starting piece Nick Suzuki. He is your best young player/prospect that you have. To get a guy like Eichel, you need to give to get. This is a underpay in my opinion, especially since those picks would be in the 20s with Eichel on the team.
Hockey247, Lenny54, Oilers4Days and 3 others a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2021 à 11 h 10
#6
TOR V5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,366
Mentions "j'aime": 1,904
MTL adds
Oilers4Days a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2021 à 11 h 11
#7
TOR V5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,366
Mentions "j'aime": 1,904
Quoting: Habs31
Kk?


Quoting: aecliptic
So youre scrapping Kotk?


He doesn't know how to sign RFA's, he's kinda new here
Oilers4Days et felixf21 a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2021 à 11 h 14
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Vegas can give Glass, Krebs and a 1st.

The 1st you are giving is almost a 2nd round pick (31OA).
Oilers4Days et felixf21 a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2021 à 11 h 21
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
Wow an Eichel trade that makes sense for the Habs but then it means we don't resign Danault as we need space for better 3rd line wingers. Also need to revamp the lines. I am ok with the 1st line as it makes sense. Line 2 should be Toffoli-Suzuki-Caufield. Line 3 we need something like Garlan-Kotkaniemi-Hoffman(if he signs a cheap 1 year deal) Line 4 Byron-Evans-Lehkonen. Not sure if you could pull all that off though.
Oilers4Days a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2021 à 11 h 22
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,211
Mentions "j'aime": 650
One thing that has not been mentioned here, is Adams willing to send him to a division rival...if so it's going to be an overpay.
Oilers4Days, Nhl_oilers et felixf21 a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2021 à 11 h 33
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,342
Mentions "j'aime": 507
Quoting: Habs31
Kk?


Quoting: aecliptic
So youre scrapping Kotk?


Quoting: LGuy54
He doesn't know how to sign RFA's, he's kinda new here


Yeah sorry, sometimes I forget about signing RFA's lol
4 juill. 2021 à 12 h 4
#12
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,361
Mentions "j'aime": 4,177
As a CBJ fan, I would love to see Anderson shipped to BUF.
Oilers4Days et Mr_Canoehead a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2021 à 12 h 19
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,056
Mentions "j'aime": 2,239
"And Josh Anderson is a really good power forward."

Looks like Anderson is more of a regular season power forward with only 4 points in 20 playoff games this year.
felixf21 a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2021 à 12 h 23
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
I know nobody will like my comment, but there is no way that you are getting a top 10 center man without making the starting piece Nick Suzuki. He is your best young player/prospect that you have. To get a guy like Eichel, you need to give to get. This is a underpay in my opinion, especially since those picks would be in the 20s with Eichel on the team.


Wromg imo. Excluding Caufield you could easily put a package togther to get Eichel. KK, Guhle, Romanov and two firsts get you Eichel in a heart beat. And thats not including a package around Caufield. You could even throw in Primeau to sweeten the pot.
4 juill. 2021 à 13 h 12
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: Commonsense27
Wromg imo. Excluding Caufield you could easily put a package togther to get Eichel. KK, Guhle, Romanov and two firsts get you Eichel in a heart beat. And thats not including a package around Caufield. You could even throw in Primeau to sweeten the pot.


Buffalo doesn't need LHD. They will have Dahlin and Power.
Nhl_oilers a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2021 à 13 h 44
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Buffalo doesn't need LHD. They will have Dahlin and Power.


Romanov prefers the right side and the word is out that Buffalo may not select Powers anyways. Either way they take that deal, which was the premise of my post
4 juill. 2021 à 13 h 52
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: Commonsense27
Romanov prefers the right side and the word is out that Buffalo may not select Powers anyways. Either way they take that deal, which was the premise of my post


I wouldn't take that deal.

Those 1sts will be low ones if the Habs have Eichel. Romanov and Guhle don't fit Buffalo's needs.

KK might be a 2C but doesn't show any signs of being a future 1C.

Buffalo needs quality over quantity. I'd want Suzuki or Caufield in an Eichel trade.
4 juill. 2021 à 14 h 2
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
I wouldn't take that deal.

Those 1sts will be low ones if the Habs have Eichel. Romanov and Guhle don't fit Buffalo's needs.

KK might be a 2C but doesn't show any signs of being a future 1C.

Buffalo needs quality over quantity. I'd want Suzuki or Caufield in an Eichel trade.


This trade gets imo, and so does another if you add Caufield. Which is the premise of my statement.

And doesn't fit their needs? Lol. Is that a joke? Buffalo has needs at every position. Romanov would be there top pairing D in 2 years, Guhle would be a second pair, KK at least would be second line center and add in a first from the 22 and 23 drafts which are verg deep btw. So yes, this does fit there needs.
4 juill. 2021 à 14 h 11
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: Commonsense27
This trade gets imo, and so does another if you add Caufield. Which is the premise of my statement.

And doesn't fit their needs? Lol. Is that a joke? Buffalo has needs at every position. Romanov would be there top pairing D in 2 years, Guhle would be a second pair, KK at least would be second line center and add in a first from the 22 and 23 drafts which are verg deep btw. So yes, this does fit there needs.


Romanov and Guhle aren't necessary when they will have Dahlin, Power and Jokiharju. Sure I'd definitely take them for free but they don't carry full value to me as Buffalo. Guhle would be stuck on the 3rd pairing. Romanov will be long out of Buffalo before he becomes anything close to a 1st pairing D man and I'd much rather a 1st round pick.

KK and 4 1sts I'd consider.
4 juill. 2021 à 14 h 37
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Romanov and Guhle aren't necessary when they will have Dahlin, Power and Jokiharju. Sure I'd definitely take them for free but they don't carry full value to me as Buffalo. Guhle would be stuck on the 3rd pairing. Romanov will be long out of Buffalo before he becomes anything close to a 1st pairing D man and I'd much rather a 1st round pick.

KK and 4 1sts I'd consider.


That essentially is KK and 4 first rounders lol. I see you're overvauling Jokiharju and undervauling the habs D prospects as well. I assume there is some bias as a leafs fan lol.
4 juill. 2021 à 15 h 3
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: Commonsense27
That essentially is KK and 4 first rounders lol. I see you're overvauling Jokiharju and undervauling the habs D prospects as well. I assume there is some bias as a leafs fan lol.


I'd take the 1sts even if they are late rather than take Romanov and Guhle. Its as simple as positional need... Buffalo needs skilled forwards more than LDH. I like Guhle and think he's a great prospect but he isn't as good as Dahlin or Power. Guhle playing the 3rd pairing is a waste and will lower his trade value and overall value.

Romanov already has 2 years of his ELC used up and is also a left shot. Imo offensive defensemen are overrated compared to defensive defencemen.
4 juill. 2021 à 16 h 21
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 7,864
Mentions "j'aime": 4,120
Quoting: Commonsense27
Wromg imo. Excluding Caufield you could easily put a package togther to get Eichel. KK, Guhle, Romanov and two firsts get you Eichel in a heart beat. And thats not including a package around Caufield. You could even throw in Primeau to sweeten the pot.


Nope. If I am Buffalo, I want a future 1c coming back which is Suzuki. Kotkaniemi will be okay, but he’s not a starter for a trade. The firsts would suck, and Guhle is okay, depending on who they draft. Romonov is great, but if they draft a defence man, they won’t need both. I would never do that if I was Buffalo.
4 juill. 2021 à 19 h 45
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
Nope. If I am Buffalo, I want a future 1c coming back which is Suzuki. Kotkaniemi will be okay, but he’s not a starter for a trade. The firsts would suck, and Guhle is okay, depending on who they draft. Romonov is great, but if they draft a defence man, they won’t need both. I would never do that if I was Buffalo.


I love how people are on here saying what Buffalo needs. They legit need everything!! They have sucked for years and have holes everywhere! And how stupid does Buffalo think teams are? You're not getting Zegras, Dach, Suzuki, Byfield, etc plus three or 4 other pieces. Eichel, as good as he is still makes 10mil on the cap. Which is a negative compared to the guys I mentioned. Plus he is currently injured with a pending neck surgery! So the answer is yes, not nope. Buffalo obviously wants a future 1c in return but in no way are they getting one with 4 or 5 other pieces on top of that.
4 juill. 2021 à 19 h 52
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 7,864
Mentions "j'aime": 4,120
Quoting: Commonsense27
I love how people are on here saying what Buffalo needs. They legit need everything!! They have sucked for years and have holes everywhere! And how stupid does Buffalo think teams are? You're not getting Zegras, Dach, Suzuki, Byfield, etc plus three or 4 other pieces. Eichel, as good as he is still makes 10mil on the cap. Which is a negative compared to the guys I mentioned. Plus he is currently injured with a pending neck surgery! So the answer is yes, not nope. Buffalo obviously wants a future 1c in return but in no way are they getting one with 4 or 5 other pieces on top of that.


I agree they are not with 4 other pieces, but the only way they are trading Eichel is if they get that 1c. If you are not going to give up your best prospect, then don’t phone, because it’s not even fair if they don’t get your best prospect.
4 juill. 2021 à 19 h 53
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
I'd take the 1sts even if they are late rather than take Romanov and Guhle. Its as simple as positional need... Buffalo needs skilled forwards more than LDH. I like Guhle and think he's a great prospect but he isn't as good as Dahlin or Power. Guhle playing the 3rd pairing is a waste and will lower his trade value and overall value.

Romanov already has 2 years of his ELC used up and is also a left shot. Imo offensive defensemen are overrated compared to defensive defencemen.


For starters Romanov isn't an offensibe D man and plays the right side. Meaning you could have a legit top 4 D of Dahlin and Guhle on the left with Romanov and Jokiharju on the right. Thats a legit top for a decade. Secondly Power isn't the consensus top overall pick with rumours out there that Buffalo doesn't want to take him. You could have Cozens, KK and Beniers as your top three centers! Middlestad and you fill the wings through free agency and the many first round picks you have coming. No brainer to accept. Althouhh I don't forsee any team giving up this much, especially with the neck issues.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage