SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ducks

Créé par: kevoisthegoat
Équipe: 2021-22 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 3 juill. 2021
Publié: 3 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
22 250 000 $
24 250 000 $
22 000 000 $
21 250 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Jarry, Tristan
  2. Poulin, Samuel
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
2.
ANA
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
3.
4.
ANA
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CBJ)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
CBJ
  1. Henrique, Adam (2 500 000 $ retained)
5.
ANA
  1. Kahun, Dominik [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Rakell, Rickard (1 500 000 $ retained)
6.
ANA
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
7.
ANA
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
8.
ANA
  1. Allard, Frédéric [Droits de RFA]
  2. Johansen, Ryan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NSH)
NSH
  1. Fleury, Haydn
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
9.
ANA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
10.
ANA
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
First is lottery protected
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de FLA
Logo de VAN
Logo de ANA
Logo de CBJ
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de FLA
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de VAN
Logo de ANA
Logo de TBL
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de FLA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de CHI
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $59 810 833 $0 $1 832 500 $21 689 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
822 500 $822 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 juill. 2021 à 20 h 50
#1
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,220
Mentions "j'aime": 25,138
Not close on Gibson.

Not close on Fowler, and I doubt that Boston is one of the four places on his Places I'd Like to Stay list.

I don't think even Nashville's 2021 first is enough incentive for us to take on Ryan Johansen's contract.
Gofnut999 a aimé ceci.
3 juill. 2021 à 21 h 55
#2
Démarrer sujet
kevo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 42
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Not close on Gibson.

Not close on Fowler, and I doubt that Boston is one of the four places on his Places I'd Like to Stay list.

I don't think even Nashville's 2021 first is enough incentive for us to take on Ryan Johansen's contract.


Quoting: OldNYIfan
Not close on Gibson.

Not close on Fowler, and I doubt that Boston is one of the four places on his Places I'd Like to Stay list.

I don't think even Nashville's 2021 first is enough incentive for us to take on Ryan Johansen's contract.


Gibson has struggled the past 2 years. and he's most likely going to Pittsburgh. Realistically that's the package they get (with possibly a 2nd)
Fowler I had no idea what to get for, I just kind of wanted him gone so the kids could play
And I meant to hit 2022 first for the Nashville pick (which would be a lot better than 2021)
3 juill. 2021 à 21 h 58
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,786
Mentions "j'aime": 8,836
Fowler has pretty tight NTC. Can only be traded to 4 teams, Boston isn’t one of them. Loves SoCal, does not want to leave. Can’t see him waiving it. But that is a terrible return for him anyway.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2021 à 0 h 31
#4
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,220
Mentions "j'aime": 25,138
Quoting: kevoisthegoat
Gibson has struggled the past 2 years. and he's most likely going to Pittsburgh. Realistically that's the package they get (with possibly a 2nd)
Fowler I had no idea what to get for, I just kind of wanted him gone so the kids could play
And I meant to hit 2022 first for the Nashville pick (which would be a lot better than 2021)


Nobody's putting a gun to our head to make us trade Gibson. We'll just keep him and you can spend the next six years trying to get someone as good as he is. After all, he must be good, because otherwise why would you be trading for him?
TZ11 a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2021 à 2 h 22
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,385
Mentions "j'aime": 1,940
That defense line up just hurts. How are Guhle and Larsson > Mahura?

Quoting: kevoisthegoat
Gibson has struggled the past 2 years. and he's most likely going to Pittsburgh. Realistically that's the package they get (with possibly a 2nd)


What are you talking about? The Ducks have no need to trade him and he has never stated that he want's out or anything. Pittsburgh has to add. At least another 2nd or a B level prospect. Would that be an overpayment? Maybe. Is that the price you'd have to pay? Yes.

Only a big package that might be an overpayment is gonna get you Gibson. The Ducks simply hang up if it's the package above.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
5 juill. 2021 à 6 h 59
#6
Démarrer sujet
kevo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 42
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: TZ11
That defense line up just hurts. How are Guhle and Larsson > Mahura?



What are you talking about? The Ducks have no need to trade him and he has never stated that he want's out or anything. Pittsburgh has to add. At least another 2nd or a B level prospect. Would that be an overpayment? Maybe. Is that the price you'd have to pay? Yes.

Only a big package that might be an overpayment is gonna get you Gibson. The Ducks simply hang up if it's the package above.


You could add P-O joseph to the trade and I'd think it'd be fair
Also that's my bad I didn't see Mahura for some reason
So then I probably trade Lindholm (because the goal here is to get Shane Wright, Matthew Savoie or Brad Lambert) for picks and prospects
And then I probably get a 1st and 2nd to take on Loui Eriksson's contract
5 juill. 2021 à 7 h 6
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,385
Mentions "j'aime": 1,940
Quoting: kevoisthegoat
You could add P-O joseph to the trade and I'd think it'd be fair
Also that's my bad I didn't see Mahura for some reason
So then I probably trade Lindholm (because the goal here is to get Shane Wright, Matthew Savoie or Brad Lambert) for picks and prospects
And then I probably get a 1st and 2nd to take on Loui Eriksson's contract


If they'd add POJ to that deal I'd be fine with that. That would be a good deal imo.

I think the Ducks should extend Manson, Lindholm and Rakell and then trade Rakell and Lindholm. Lindholm to Chicago would work well I think and there seems to be some interest in Rakell as well. Then retain some salary on both. That would really help the rebuild. You could get quite a few good assets.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage