SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

21-22 Rangers

Créé par: SwedishChef
Équipe: 2021-22 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 2 juill. 2021
Publié: 3 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
No need to thank me Drury.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 750 000 $
55 500 000 $
2950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
11 000 000 $
43 950 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
2.
NYR
  1. Vilardi, Gabriel
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (STL)
LAK
  1. Buchnevich, Pavel [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (NYR)
3.
NYR
  1. McNabb, Brayden
  2. Reaves, Ryan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VGK)
VGK
  1. Reunanen, Tarmo
  2. Strome, Ryan (2 250 000 $ retained)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
4.
NYR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (VGK)
DET
  1. Hájek, Libor [Droits de RFA]
5.
NYR
SEA
  1. Howden, Brett [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de NYR
Logo de VGK
Logo de OTT
Logo de LAK
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2023
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $69 664 802 $0 $10 100 000 $11 835 198 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
3 950 000 $3 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
950 000 $950 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 juill. 2021 à 13 h 45
#1
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Why are we making this trade with Vegas? Reeves didnt play a single game in the playoffs and is, essentially, a role/throw in player in the lineup. Plus were retaining money on Strome? why? What do we need their 1st round pick in a very weak draft?

Were still soft down the middle. Bottom 6 outside of Reeves is soft. We've replaced Buch who was scoring at a near ppg pace for Blake Coleman.
3 juill. 2021 à 13 h 48
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 5,588
Mentions "j'aime": 3,001
Detroit already have 6 very good LD prospects, what we need is veteran help until they mature, not more prospects.
buffbry a aimé ceci.
3 juill. 2021 à 13 h 51
#3
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,842
Mentions "j'aime": 5,306
Wings pass, not worth a 3rd at All
3 juill. 2021 à 14 h 11
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 22
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: aecliptic
Why are we making this trade with Vegas? Reeves didnt play a single game in the playoffs and is, essentially, a role/throw in player in the lineup. Plus were retaining money on Strome? why? What do we need their 1st round pick in a very weak draft?

Were still soft down the middle. Bottom 6 outside of Reeves is soft. We've replaced Buch who was scoring at a near ppg pace for Blake Coleman.



We need a Veteran LD and some grit on the 4th line.
We get a 1st for Strome who we don't need long term(IMO) and that blocks our younger Centers. We're retaining on Strome because we have a lot of cap space this year and Vegas doesn't. It's also only one year.
I expect at least one of Chytil or Vilardi to take a step forward.

We save cap by dealing Buch and replacing him with Coleman.
We need a ton of cap in the future to resign Fox, Zbad, Kakko, Laf, Miller, Lundkvist etc.
3 juill. 2021 à 14 h 15
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 22
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: Billy12Bob
Detroit already have 6 very good LD prospects, what we need is veteran help until they mature, not more prospects.

Quoting: buffbry
Wings pass, not worth a 3rd at All



Ok, I was just throwing it out there. I thought maybe Yzerman would like his former 2nd round pick back for a late 3rd. I think he still got some potential but we have no room for him.
buffbry a aimé ceci.
3 juill. 2021 à 14 h 17
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,597
Mentions "j'aime": 1,589
I like Buch but I’m not trading Vilardi for him
3 juill. 2021 à 14 h 25
#7
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: SwedishChef
We need a Veteran LD and some grit on the 4th line.
We get a 1st for Strome who we don't need long term(IMO) and that blocks our younger Centers. We're retaining on Strome because we have a lot of cap space this year and Vegas doesn't. It's also only one year.
I expect at least one of Chytil or Vilardi to take a step forward.

We save cap by dealing Buch and replacing him with Coleman.
We need a ton of cap in the future to resign Fox, Zbad, Kakko, Laf, Miller, Lundkvist etc.


So youre gonna trade Buch over 1m? Not worth it.
Strome isnt worth a 1st round pick, lets just get that straight.
Sure we need grit, but why would Vegas trade their grittiest LD on a friendly contract? Theres no incentive for them to do this.
We need grit, but Reeves isnt the answer. Why trade for someone who didnt play a single game in the playoffs?
Im not even bother with Chytil because people have been brainwashed to believe that hes some how a center.
3 juill. 2021 à 14 h 48
#8
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: aecliptic
Why are we making this trade with Vegas? Reeves didnt play a single game in the playoffs and is, essentially, a role/throw in player in the lineup. Plus were retaining money on Strome? why? What do we need their 1st round pick in a very weak draft?

Were still soft down the middle. Bottom 6 outside of Reeves is soft. We've replaced Buch who was scoring at a near ppg pace for Blake Coleman.


Uh, Reaves played 12 of Vegas' 19 games and was suspended for 2 of them. I'm not commenting on the trade, but hey you should at least know your facts before you write stuff.
3 juill. 2021 à 14 h 54
#9
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: TrueCanuck
Uh, Reaves played 12 of Vegas' 19 games and was suspended for 2 of them. I'm not commenting on the trade, but hey you should at least know your facts before you write stuff.


Thats my fault, should have fact checked. Its what I was told when I mentioned it to other Rangers people. Either way, if Gallant want's a squad thats always moving their feet, hes probably not the best option to have out there.
3 juill. 2021 à 14 h 58
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Rangers accept the Detroit deal.

And decline the rest pretty easily.
3 juill. 2021 à 16 h 13
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 22
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: Sagecoll
Rangers accept the Detroit deal.

And decline the rest pretty easily.


Ok. You write the same thing in every thread without saying anything constructive.
Shakabakes a aimé ceci.
3 juill. 2021 à 16 h 16
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 22
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: aecliptic
So youre gonna trade Buch over 1m? Not worth it.
Strome isnt worth a 1st round pick, lets just get that straight.
Sure we need grit, but why would Vegas trade their grittiest LD on a friendly contract? Theres no incentive for them to do this.
We need grit, but Reeves isnt the answer. Why trade for someone who didnt play a single game in the playoffs?
Im not even bother with Chytil because people have been brainwashed to believe that hes some how a center.


We save closer to 2m and we replace him for free while trading a strength for a need.
Strome @ 50% is worth a late 1st imo.
4 juill. 2021 à 1 h 13
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: SwedishChef
Ok. You write the same thing in every thread without saying anything constructive.


What would you prefer? A breakdown about how you're criminally undervaluing Buch + Strome. I don't think it's worth the time if you're that far off in terms of value.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage