SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Retool

Équipe: 2021-22 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 3 juill. 2021
Publié: 3 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Draft Eklund #1, McTavish #8
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 175 000 $
2800 000 $
24 000 000 $
32 250 000 $
22 000 000 $
87 500 000 $
32 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Elvenes, Lucas
  2. Fleury, Marc-André
  3. Hague, Nicolas
  4. Krebs, Peyton
  5. Smith, Reilly
  6. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (VGK)
Détails additionnels:
Fleury to be flipped to Carolina
VGK
  1. Eakin, Cody
  2. Eichel, Jack
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (MTL)
2.
BUF
  1. Drury, Jack [Liste de réserve]
  2. Foegele, Warren [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
Détails additionnels:
drury and the pick going back to Vegas
CAR
  1. Fleury, Marc-André (3 500 000 $ retained)
3.
BUF
VGK
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
Détails additionnels:
Drury
4.
5.
BUF
  1. Riikola, Juuso
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
top 10 protected
6.
WSH
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
7.
BUF
  1. Quick, Jonathan
  2. Vilardi, Gabriel
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (LAK)
8.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BUF
Logo de LAK
Logo de BUF
Logo de FLA
Logo de BUF
Logo de MTL
Logo de BUF
Logo de COL
Logo de BUF
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de VGK
Logo de PIT
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $56 622 667 $113 916 $1 700 000 $24 877 333 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
716 667 $716 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
791 667 $791 667 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
889 166 $889 166 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 juill. 2021 à 7 h 49
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,113
Mentions "j'aime": 4,974
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
This is a worse argument than when you tried to pretend you didnt know andrew bjork was american when you said he would be a late bloomer because he was still getting used to North American size ice.


I maintain that, collegee ice is smaller. He'll be fine with more game time. And I knew Bjork was American
3 juill. 2021 à 7 h 50
#27
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,120
Mentions "j'aime": 14,138
Quoting: Caniac2000
Nope, Fleury is literally not good outside of the 1 year he plays Anaheim San Jose and Arizona a combined 24 times.


I could say a lot. But I will simply say that I disagree with you on how good Fleury is. I disagree with you that you will find a goalie about as good as him for cheaper. I disagree that Jack Drury (who is 1 year from UFA), a 2nd and Foegele (who wants out) is too much to pay for him 50% retained, and i disagree that Dougie Hamilton is the best defensemen in the NHL.

Have a nice day.
3 juill. 2021 à 7 h 51
#28
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,120
Mentions "j'aime": 14,138
Quoting: Caniac2000
I maintain that, collegee ice is smaller. He'll be fine with more game time. And I knew Bjork was American


he hasn't played in college since 2017, you said this in 2021
3 juill. 2021 à 7 h 52
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,113
Mentions "j'aime": 4,974
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
I could say a lot. But I will simply say that I disagree with you on how good Fleury is. I disagree with you that you will find a goalie about as good as him for cheaper. I disagree that Jack Drury (who is 1 year from UFA), a 2nd and Foegele (who wants out) is too much to pay for him 50% retained, and i disagree that Dougie Hamilton is the best defensemen in the NHL.

Have a nice day.


I don't think it's too much to pay for him, I'm just saying the need isn't there. He's just way too inconsistent for what Carolina need

Hamilton is the best defenseman in the NHL. Look at any analytic site and you will see that very quickly. I recommend Natural Stat Trick, Evolving Hockey or even Hockey Reference
3 juill. 2021 à 7 h 53
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,113
Mentions "j'aime": 4,974
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
he hasn't played in college since 2017, you said this in 2021


Yes? He's played 140 games in that time. He'll be fine if he can actually stay in the lineup. Since he has a shred of talent, he should be in the top 9 in Buffalo which won't hurt.
3 juill. 2021 à 8 h 48
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 165
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: Caniac2000
I don't think it's too much to pay for him, I'm just saying the need isn't there. He's just way too inconsistent for what Carolina need

Hamilton is the best defenseman in the NHL. Look at any analytic site and you will see that very quickly. I recommend Natural Stat Trick, Evolving Hockey or even Hockey Reference


What analytic site has Hamilton as the best defenceman?
3 juill. 2021 à 8 h 51
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,113
Mentions "j'aime": 4,974
Quoting: WhatThePuck
What analytic site has Hamilton as the best defenceman?


All of them
3 juill. 2021 à 8 h 52
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 165
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: Caniac2000
All of them


Lol show me one that does.
3 juill. 2021 à 8 h 56
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,113
Mentions "j'aime": 4,974
Quoting: WhatThePuck
Lol show me one that does.


NST

Hockey Reference

Evolving-Hockey
3 juill. 2021 à 9 h 2
#35
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 165
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: Caniac2000
NST

Hockey Reference

Evolving-Hockey


What do you even mean number 1 on NST & Hockey reference? Number 1 in what?

He's not #1 on Evolving Hockey. Makar is.
3 juill. 2021 à 9 h 54
#36
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,113
Mentions "j'aime": 4,974
Quoting: WhatThePuck
What do you even mean number 1 on NST & Hockey reference? Number 1 in what?

He's not #1 on Evolving Hockey. Makar is.


Use 3 year sample sizes, Makar isn't even top 50.

He's the best defenseman in the NHL in xGF when compensated with appropriate QoT and QoC numbers. He's also ranked in the 90's in terms of percentile for xWAR and xGAR
3 juill. 2021 à 10 h 52
#37
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 165
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: Caniac2000
Use 3 year sample sizes, Makar isn't even top 50.

He's the best defenseman in the NHL in xGF when compensated with appropriate QoT and QoC numbers. He's also ranked in the 90's in terms of percentile for xWAR and xGAR


Man you moved those goalposts into a whole other dimension. We're talking right now. You said number 1 defenceman. He's good, but not better than Makar & Fox. Now you gotta add a bunch of qualifiers too?

Just using xGF Brent Burns has the 3rd highest and Morgan Reilly has the 4th. Are Burns & Reilly the 3rd and 4th best d men in the NHL? Kind of an odd metric to use to show who's the best d man.
3 juill. 2021 à 11 h 8
#38
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,113
Mentions "j'aime": 4,974
Quoting: WhatThePuck
Man you moved those goalposts into a whole other dimension. We're talking right now. You said number 1 defenceman. He's good, but not better than Makar & Fox. Now you gotta add a bunch of qualifiers too?

Just using xGF Brent Burns has the 3rd highest and Morgan Reilly has the 4th. Are Burns & Reilly the 3rd and 4th best d men in the NHL? Kind of an odd metric to use to show who's the best d man.


Buddy, you're using players who have only been in the league for abbreviated seasons? That's completely laughable. That's why you use the 3 year sample size, to get a game played sample that is larger than 100!
3 juill. 2021 à 11 h 57
#39
VGKNation702
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,942
Mentions "j'aime": 1,598
I don’t want anything to do with Cody Eakin. Decline that trade for him alone lol
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
3 juill. 2021 à 13 h 48
#40
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 165
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: Caniac2000
Buddy, you're using players who have only been in the league for abbreviated seasons? That's completely laughable. That's why you use the 3 year sample size, to get a game played sample that is larger than 100!


Bro do you know what best d man in the league right now means lmao. The question wasn't who has better volume stats over 3 years.
3 juill. 2021 à 15 h 59
#41
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,113
Mentions "j'aime": 4,974
Quoting: WhatThePuck
Bro do you know what best d man in the league right now means lmao. The question wasn't who has better volume stats over 3 years.


You can't use analytics in a 1 year sample size buddy. It's too inaccurate. You always use the 3 year sample, because it adjusts for up and down years as well as good teams, bad opponents (vise versa) and everything else! Best D man in the league in terms of analytics will always use the 3 year sample LMAO
3 juill. 2021 à 16 h 1
#42
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,120
Mentions "j'aime": 14,138
Quoting: WhatThePuck
Bro do you know what best d man in the league right now means lmao. The question wasn't who has better volume stats over 3 years.


Don't bother with him. He is the biggest homer on here and is not beholden to facts
4 juill. 2021 à 2 h 59
#43
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 165
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: Caniac2000
You can't use analytics in a 1 year sample size buddy. It's too inaccurate. You always use the 3 year sample, because it adjusts for up and down years as well as good teams, bad opponents (vise versa) and everything else! Best D man in the league in terms of analytics will always use the 3 year sample LMAO


No you don't, that's ridiculous. Why does Evolving Hockey have Makar / Fox / McAvoy as the best d man this year then? You just made up an arbitrary 3 year mark just to cherry pick for Dougie. You're just making up stuff, and don't want to believe anything that proves you wrong.
7 juill. 2021 à 4 h 12
#44
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,113
Mentions "j'aime": 4,974
Quoting: WhatThePuck
No you don't, that's ridiculous. Why does Evolving Hockey have Makar / Fox / McAvoy as the best d man this year then? You just made up an arbitrary 3 year mark just to cherry pick for Dougie. You're just making up stuff, and don't want to believe anything that proves you wrong.


If you want to use a single year sample size, the best defenseman in the NHL this year were Niklas Hjalmersson, Brett Pesce and Matt Dumba.... I'll let you make your own decisions about why 3 year sample sizes are better, but 1 year samples are WILDLY unreliable.
7 juill. 2021 à 5 h 48
#45
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 165
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: Caniac2000
If you want to use a single year sample size, the best defenseman in the NHL this year were Niklas Hjalmersson, Brett Pesce and Matt Dumba.... I'll let you make your own decisions about why 3 year sample sizes are better, but 1 year samples are WILDLY unreliable.


What lol? Show me where Nicklas Hjalmersson was a top d man in the league this year?

Using a 3 year sample size to show who's the best d man in the 2021 season makes absolutely no sense.
7 juill. 2021 à 10 h 48
#46
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,113
Mentions "j'aime": 4,974
Quoting: WhatThePuck
What lol? Show me where Nicklas Hjalmersson was a top d man in the league this year?

Using a 3 year sample size to show who's the best d man in the 2021 season makes absolutely no sense.


You don't go by single seasons man, you really do not understand the point of analytics. Hamilton has been one of the best in the NHL for the duration of his career, but gets overlooked by people like you who do not understand the magnitude of his abilities.

Literally, look at NST
7 juill. 2021 à 11 h 3
#47
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 165
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: Caniac2000
You don't go by single seasons man, you really do not understand the point of analytics. Hamilton has been one of the best in the NHL for the duration of his career, but gets overlooked by people like you who do not understand the magnitude of his abilities.

Literally, look at NST


You didn't answer my question? Where was Nicklas Hjalmersson one of the top d man this year?

When discussing who is the top d man of 2021 you use stats from this season. You just keep straw manning really hard and pivoting to random stuff. Nobody asked who has been a top d man over a 3 year period.

You used all situations total xGF to say who is a top dman. You also said Cale Makar isn't a top 50 defenceman lol. It seems like you're the one who doesn't really get analytics or how to use these stats.
7 juill. 2021 à 11 h 8
#48
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,113
Mentions "j'aime": 4,974
Quoting: WhatThePuck
You didn't answer my question? Where was Nicklas Hjalmersson one of the top d man this year?

When discussing who is the top d man of 2021 you use stats from this season. You just keep straw manning really hard and pivoting to random stuff. Nobody asked who has been a top d man over a 3 year period.

You used all situations total xGF to say who is a top dman. You also said Cale Makar isn't a top 50 defenceman lol. It seems like you're the one who doesn't really get analytics or how to use these stats.


As I said, literally look at NST

We're discussing the top D men, using 1 season is laughable. You're clutching at straws because you do not understand the analytics side of the game, which is fine, but do not try and dispute it.

I used ES_xGF and xGAR/xWAR with ES_xGD to justify my opinion. I said Makar hasn't been a top 50 D man in that time because he's been in the league... what 2 1/2 years in terms of games played? He looks promising, sure. But right now, yeah no. Not what the stats say in the slightest, and you're just continuing to argue something you do not understand.
7 juill. 2021 à 13 h 24
#49
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 165
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: Caniac2000
As I said, literally look at NST

We're discussing the top D men, using 1 season is laughable. You're clutching at straws because you do not understand the analytics side of the game, which is fine, but do not try and dispute it.

I used ES_xGF and xGAR/xWAR with ES_xGD to justify my opinion. I said Makar hasn't been a top 50 D man in that time because he's been in the league... what 2 1/2 years in terms of games played? He looks promising, sure. But right now, yeah no. Not what the stats say in the slightest, and you're just continuing to argue something you do not understand.


Makar isn't a top 50 d man..either you're really dumb or just trolling. This is like Dunning Kruger 101.
22 juill. 2021 à 16 h 51
#50
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,120
Mentions "j'aime": 14,138
Quoting: Caniac2000
Carolina don't need a 36 year old goaltender. Nedeljkovic was nothing short of incredible and Fleury is a cap dump in waiting.


laugh
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage