Quoting: GMs
I don’t know, but why would it be against the rule ? OTT trade for Dunn before the expansion draft, protect Chabot Zaitsev Dunn and expose Mete instead. After the expansion draft, they trade Dunn vs DeBrusk and the pick. The 3 GMs talked to each other before the expansion draft. Because Boston couldn’t protect Dunn because of McAvoy Carlo and Grzelcyk
Technically it couldnt be a 3 way trade because it would have to go down as multiple transactions based. on the fact that you have trades at different times.
Trade 1 would be Ottawa getting Dunn and a 3rd for future considerations? As well as a 3rd for future considerations? (dont think either of these get approved)
Ottawa protects Dunn in the expansion draft. (nothing wrong here)
Then the Sens would be trading Dunn to Boston for Debrusk. (this would get approved)
Finally Ottawa trades Debrusk to St. Louis for future considerations.
I'll try to find something to actually back up this weird feeling I have about this idea but I dont think we've seen anything like this because its really just circumventing the expansion draft. Multiple trades going sending significant assets for nothing is a red flag to the league. Even if you wanted to, you cant give good players away for free. Ruins the integrity of the league, theyd block the transaction for sure.