SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Shakeup Scenario 1

Créé par: FunMustBeAlways
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 4 juin 2021
Publié: 29 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
NOTE: BUF, OTT and WSH trades occur before the Expansion Draft.

ED protections look like:
Hertl
Kane
Reinhart
Labanc
Kuznetsov
Tierney
Balcers

Karlsson (NMC)
Vlasic (NMC)
Meloche

Vanecek

Players that help fulfill the requirements: Nieto, Gambrell, Burns, Jones
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2780 000 $
2800 000 $
1765 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
2760 000 $
1815 000 $
2793 167 $
21 500 000 $
1750 000 $
15 200 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 200 000 $
2850 000 $
13 000 000 $
1750 000 $
33 750 000 $
23 150 000 $
Transactions
1.
WSH
  1. Couture, Logan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. Reinhart, Sam [Droits de RFA]
BUF
  1. Gregor, Noah
  2. Meier, Timo
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
  4. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
3.
OTT
  1. Donato, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
4.
SJS
    Expansion Draft selection
    5.
    SJS
    1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (SEA)
    SEA
    1. Simek, Radim
    Détails additionnels:
    Anywhere
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de COL
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    2022
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de MIN
    2023
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $65 885 197 $0 $425 000 $15 614 803 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    815 000 $815 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    716 667 $716 667 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    796 667 $796 667 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    780 000 $780 000 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    793 167 $793 167 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 5

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    29 juin 2021 à 1 h 8
    #1
    train, train
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 2,996
    Mentions "j'aime": 730
    I like the roster, though I wouldn't do the Couture deal. I have a feeling he bounces back with a great year next year given less responsibility to take on the top teams every night and a 3rd center, which thankfully the organization has seemed to identify too and will pursue.

    Getting Larsson would be absolutely lights out for this team. Tatar too at that price. It's doubtful but hey Toffoli signed for a lot less than what everyone expected last offseason so there's a chance.

    I'd be ecstatic if SEA takes Burns but it'd very likely take compensation from SJ to do so, and even then I'm not sure they do and/or SJ does. To me, SJ's offseason hopes of becoming a contender again rests on SEA taking Burns without SJ giving up a 1st or the equivalent of a 1st in value to SEA to make it happen.

    Also, SJ probably doesn't need more LDmen and given that Vlasic was pretty decent the last 20ish games of the season we can just leave him be there on the bottom pairing and have Knyzhov stay with EK65. Most importantly, Sharks need that cap space to be able to afford extending Hertl and Ferraro the following season.
    FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
    29 juin 2021 à 1 h 52
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,204
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
    Quoting: CheechYou
    I like the roster, though I wouldn't do the Couture deal. I have a feeling he bounces back with a great year next year given less responsibility to take on the top teams every night and a 3rd center, which thankfully the organization has seemed to identify too and will pursue.


    I feel ya. Personally, I see the Couture trade as short term pain for long term gain. Couture is the better player now, and is clutch in the playoffs, but later on his contract will be a burden. Kuzy’s contract ends sooner and with a new start, he could also bounce back to his old self.

    Quoting: CheechYou
    Getting Larsson would be absolutely lights out for this team. Tatar too at that price. It's doubtful but hey Toffoli signed for a lot less than what everyone expected last offseason so there's a chance.


    Totally agree. With Tatar, I think getting scratched all playoffs will hurt his market value even though he’s still a very solid player analytically. So whoever signs him will be getting a potential steal.

    Quoting: CheechYou
    I'd be ecstatic if SEA takes Burns but it'd very likely take compensation from SJ to do so, and even then I'm not sure they do and/or SJ does. To me, SJ's offseason hopes of becoming a contender again rests on SEA taking Burns without SJ giving up a 1st or the equivalent of a 1st in value to SEA to make it happen.


    Yeah agreed on this as well. The Burns option isn’t the most likely one but it is within the realm of possibilities (especially with compensation). Moving his cap would free up a lot of much needed cap space for us.

    Quoting: CheechYou
    Also, SJ probably doesn't need more LDmen and given that Vlasic was pretty decent the last 20ish games of the season we can just leave him be there on the bottom pairing and have Knyzhov stay with EK65. Most importantly, Sharks need that cap space to be able to afford extending Hertl and Ferraro the following season.


    I see where you’re coming from but while I like Knyzhov, I still think Karlsson has to have a better, more skilled partner to have a chance at bouncing back. Merrill is one I deal with not signing, so we could replace Vlasic with him, but in my opinion McCabe is similar to Tatar in that he’s underrated and very solid for what he is.
    CheechYou a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage