SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Busy Offseason

Créé par: dzmets
Équipe: 2021-22 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 26 juin 2021
Publié: 27 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
2950 000 $
34 850 000 $
32 250 000 $
21 750 000 $
24 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
11 150 000 $
11 000 000 $
66 000 000 $
13 500 000 $
22 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Beniers, Matthew
3950 000 $
Clarke, Brandt
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Boldy, Matthew
  2. Dumba, Matt
  3. Rossi, Marco
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
MIN
  1. Eichel, Jack
  2. Murray, Brett
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
Dumba to Winnipeg in 3 way trade
2.
BUF
  1. Harkins, Jansen
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
3.
BUF
MIN
  1. Harkins, Jansen
Détails additionnels:
Part of 3 way deal with Winnipeg
4.
BUF
  1. Merzlikins, Elvis
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Pilut, Lawrence [Liste de réserve]
  2. Reinhart, Sam [Droits de RFA]
  3. Ristolainen, Rasmus
5.
BUF
ANA
  1. Eakin, Cody
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
Expansion Draft
6.
BUF
STL
  1. Olofsson, Victor
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BUF
Logo de WPG
Logo de CBJ
Logo de BUF
Logo de MTL
Logo de BUF
Logo de MTL
Logo de BUF
Logo de COL
Logo de BUF
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de CBJ
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $64 624 750 $113 916 $850 000 $16 875 250 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 juin 2021 à 9 h 59
#1
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 28,478
Mentions "j'aime": 11,075
Hard pass from STL. Olofsson is a worse one-trick pony than Hoffman and I can't imagine a world where they'd swap Sunny for him.
27 juin 2021 à 10 h 9
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 1,288
Mentions "j'aime": 813
WPG takes that deal and runs
27 juin 2021 à 10 h 40
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 198
Mentions "j'aime": 71
Quoting: hwjw
WPG takes that deal and runs


I agree, a mid 1st and future 3rd plus a Bottom 6 forward for Dumba Is probably light. I think swapping the 3rd for a prospect would be more realistic. Jets have more prospect depth at D, but I think Buf would be looking for forwards, where the Jets pool is quite shallow.
hwjw a aimé ceci.
27 juin 2021 à 10 h 48
#4
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,361
Mentions "j'aime": 4,177
#5 OA *AND* Elvis for Reinhart and some spare parts?

My dude…
27 juin 2021 à 11 h 24
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 2,709
Mentions "j'aime": 1,053
Quoting: dopplsan
#5 OA *AND* Elvis for Reinhart and some spare parts?

My dude…


Assuming Jones is traded, Risto would be in your top 4 and Pilut would be in the top 6. Reinhart is a much better player than the Jets likely get at 5. He has outproduced just about every 5 o/a pick over the last 15 years with the exception of Kessel and Elias Pettersson. A few of those chosen there have amounted to nothing in the NHL. (Dal Colle, Hayton, Juolevi) He would be your 1C at least for the next couple of years and then if you do find someone elite. He slots nicely into a 2C role
27 juin 2021 à 11 h 45
#6
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,361
Mentions "j'aime": 4,177
Quoting: dzmets
Assuming Jones is traded, Risto would be in your top 4 and Pilut would be in the top 6. Reinhart is a much better player than the Jets likely get at 5. He has outproduced just about every 5 o/a pick over the last 15 years with the exception of Kessel and Elias Pettersson. A few of those chosen there have amounted to nothing in the NHL. (Dal Colle, Hayton, Juolevi) He would be your 1C at least for the next couple of years and then if you do find someone elite. He slots nicely into a 2C role


Team is rebuilding; sure, some interest in Reinhart, but you’re talking about a guy who is going to maximize production during the next several years - a period when the team around him is likely to be bad. Yes he is likely to be better than whoever is drafted at #5, but that’s also largely because he is 10 years older than whoever is going to be drafted at #5.

And the whole “Bad Players Have Been Drafted #5” argument doesn’t do much - Petersson, Hanifin, Lindholm, are also recent #5 picks. If the prospect picked there turns out to be as good as them, then awesome.

Plus, saying “he can be your 1C until you find someone better” avoids an important point - the “someone better” is likely going to be obtained via the draft, since we all know elite 1C’s otherwise hit the FA market all the time. So, not exactly going to be wanting to part with high picks.

Same principal applies to Risto, a “meh” player who I hear BUF is interested in dumping more than anything. CBJ already have younger D-Men who are going to want/need development time.

Pilut is signed in the KHL next season, and his Reserve Rights are going to expire in two years; so, if he doesn’t want to play for CBJ, he could just sit in the KHL for another year.

Elvis is a bright point on this team - a very good player who has talked about how much he wants to be here and re-sign. He’s not going anywhere absent a monster package.
27 juin 2021 à 11 h 56
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 2,709
Mentions "j'aime": 1,053
Modifié 27 juin 2021 à 12 h 7
Quoting: dopplsan
Team is rebuilding; sure, some interest in Reinhart, but you’re talking about a guy who is going to maximize production during the next several years - a period when the team around him is likely to be bad. Yes he is likely to be better than whoever is drafted at #5, but that’s also largely because he is 10 years older than whoever is going to be drafted at #5.

And the whole “Bad Players Have Been Drafted #5” argument doesn’t do much - Petersson, Hanifin, Lindholm, are also recent #5 picks. If the prospect picked there turns out to be as good as them, then awesome.

Plus, saying “he can be your 1C until you find someone better” avoids an important point - the “someone better” is likely going to be obtained via the draft, since we all know elite 1C’s otherwise hit the FA market all the time. So, not exactly going to be wanting to part with high picks.

Same principal applies to Risto, a “meh” player who I hear BUF is interested in dumping more than anything. CBJ already have younger D-Men who are going to want/need development time.

Pilut is signed in the KHL next season, and his Reserve Rights are going to expire in two years; so, if he doesn’t want to play for CBJ, he could just sit in the KHL for another year.

Elvis is a bright point on this team - a very good player who has talked about how much he wants to be here and re-sign. He’s not going anywhere absent a monster package.


I mentioned Pettersson being better. Reinhart is better than Hanafin even tough it is tough comparing D to a forward. Lindholm is on par with Reinhart. Reinhart is only 7 years older than who you would raft at 5. You are not drafting 15 year olds. The only centers worthy of top 5 consideration this year are talked about as being good 2Cs or a low end 1 C if they hit their ceiling. Beniers who will be gone by 5, Mctavish, Eklund (also likely gone at 5) and Johnson who projects more to the wing. Pilut has an out clause to accept an nhl deal and only left because the Sabres buried him behind lesser players and he saw no path towards playing. Merzlikins may want to stay and perhaps CBJ need to add an a forward prospect Foudy or Texier. Not sure why Columbus would want to hand out a big contract to a goalie while going through a long rebuild
27 juin 2021 à 11 h 59
#8
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,361
Mentions "j'aime": 4,177
Quoting: dzmets
I mentioned Pettersson being better. Reinhart is better than Hanafin even tough it is tough comparing D to a forward. Lindholm is on par with Reinhart. Reinhart is only 7 years older than who you would raft at 5. You are not drafting 15 year olds. The only centers worthy of top 5 consideration this year are talked about as being good 2Cs or a low end 1 C if they hit their ceiling. Beniers who will be gone by 5, Mctavish, Eklund and Johnson who both project more to the wing


Again, doing the “look at other #5 picks” doesn’t do much. The exercise of comparing draft picks is flawed because it overlooks another point - players available after the pick that could’ve been picked but weren’t.

And OK, Reinhart is much better *right now* in part because he is *7* years older than them. Every other point remains the same.

Try and beat the point all you want, this trades not happening.
27 juin 2021 à 12 h 51
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 198
Mentions "j'aime": 71
The Columbus-Sabres trade is interesting.

Even rebuilding teams need players, and having a very good goalie can be very important. Player development is tough in the NHL, it involves letting players make mistakes that lead to goals. Too many of those, not only loses, but bad habits and morale issues become a concern. Great goaltending can help reduce that.

I don’t think Merz is getting dealt.

The #5 pick. There is a misconception that this is a ‘bad’ draft. Normal considering half the players haven’t played much, and scouting has been a mess due to more important concerns. That said, there are some very good prospects. The top 5-7 picks likely have top line/top pairing grades for most teams. Most of these players are D or C, the two positions Columbus happens to be weakest at. If Columbus shares that view (I think they do), the #5 pick has the potential to net a #1C or top pair D. To give that up at the start of a rebuild is very risky, it’s almost impossible to trade for those assets, and even signing them is next to impossible. I’m not considering ANY prospect in this draft to be generational talent, but there aren’t more than about 10 of those playing at any given time in the NHL.

Reinhert is a 2C on a 2C contract, zero surplus value. Risto is an offensive defence-man paid to be top 4, but struggles to deliver top 4 performance because of issues in the neutral and defensive zone. He’s a luxury on a contender with excess cap space, not a core top 4D on any contending or rebuilding team.

Based that, I think that even Reinhert and Risto wouldn’t be enough for the #5 pick.
27 juin 2021 à 12 h 58
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 2,709
Mentions "j'aime": 1,053
Quoting: Azura0055
The Columbus-Sabres trade is interesting.

Even rebuilding teams need players, and having a very good goalie can be very important. Player development is tough in the NHL, it involves letting players make mistakes that lead to goals. Too many of those, not only loses, but bad habits and morale issues become a concern. Great goaltending can help reduce that.

I don’t think Merz is getting dealt.

The #5 pick. There is a misconception that this is a ‘bad’ draft. Normal considering half the players haven’t played much, and scouting has been a mess due to more important concerns. That said, there are some very good prospects. The top 5-7 picks likely have top line/top pairing grades for most teams. Most of these players are D or C, the two positions Columbus happens to be weakest at. If Columbus shares that view (I think they do), the #5 pick has the potential to net a #1C or top pair D. To give that up at the start of a rebuild is very risky, it’s almost impossible to trade for those assets, and even signing them is next to impossible. I’m not considering ANY prospect in this draft to be generational talent, but there aren’t more than about 10 of those playing at any given time in the NHL.

Reinhert is a 2C on a 2C contract, zero surplus value. Risto is an offensive defence-man paid to be top 4, but struggles to deliver top 4 performance because of issues in the neutral and defensive zone. He’s a luxury on a contender with excess cap space, not a core top 4D on any contending or rebuilding team.

Based that, I think that even Reinhert and Risto wouldn’t be enough for the #5 pick.


Clearly Columbus looks to move Risto at the deadline unless things go very well as do the Sabres with Merzlikins. Both are expiring UFA contracts and I am not sure about Elvis but Risto will definitely sacrifice dollars for a better opportunity to win. This may not be the right move for Columbus if they are planning a long rebuild but if they are looking to move futures to bring in an impact player now they likely will not do any better than Reinhart
27 juin 2021 à 13 h 7
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,607
Mentions "j'aime": 6,912
The Dumba deal is actually a reasonable value for the Jets and would probably be something they consider. You could leave Bryson out though, he doesn't add anything that Winnipeg would need or want
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage