Seems like a lot for Dunn. I believe they were only looking for a 1st for him when was on the block earlier this year.

Oh good grief. He was NOT on the block.

Beg to differ, see #5:

https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article/31-thoughts-dubois-laine-trade-finally-came-together/

It’s kinda hard for Friedman to confirm they were asking for a 1st if he wasn’t out there.

You need to work on your reading comprehension. "They are believed to be looking for a first rounder" is not confirmation of anything, it's parroted clickbait fiction he cribbed off the worst hockey "rumor" site on the net.

Spin however you’d like. It’s been out there he’s been available for months

And by "spin" you mean understand the correct meaning of all the English words in that sentence? Feel perfectly free to quote the passage that you imagines "confirms" what you claim. This has been delusional nonsense for months. And on it goes, apparently...

Oh look, the Blues Athletic writer even says he’s been on the block:

“ Dunn, who missed the end of the season with what was believed to be a concussion, was on the trade block earlier in the season. He’ll be a restricted free agent with arbitration rights, so it’s likely the Blues will be re-exploring the option of moving him this season.”

https://theathletic.com/2608050/2021/05/24/the-blues-10-biggest-offseason-priorities-as-an-important-summer-begins/?source=user_shared_article

Maybe you should stop.

He's just parroting the same old bull**** everyone else is. He should stop.

By the way, still waiting for you to quote the Friedman passage that "confirms" what you claim...

2 sources prove you wrong, don’t be salty.

Again, Friedman was not a source of anything. He was parroting the worst hockey blog in existence, backed away from it within a day and then pretended like he never said it. Just like the rest of the parrots. And again, it does not say what you claim, as anyone who speaks English can see.

All I see is what appears to be your uninformed opinion. Excuse me if I choose to base mine in reality.

Then quote the Friedman passage that makes your claim reality. Funny how you won't do that. It's almost as if you're rejecting reality to base it in obvious nonsense.

Why are you so fixated on Friedman?

He confirmed Dunn there had been trade talks on Dunn.

The Blues own beat writer very clearly stated “on the block”.

You’re wrong, you’ve been proven wrong and yet you still are trying to argue some petty point….sad.

Your whole point started with this Friedman claim, duh. AND you keep repeating the same exact nonsense, then feign shock and dismay when asked to back up the claim. Where exactly did he confirm trade talks over Dunn, dude? How hard is this? Show us all the part where he said what you claim he said, it's very simple.

If you can't even attempt to support your claim, we're done here. You have nothing but delusions of grandeur, and ain;t nobody got time for that.

Your whole point was that Dunn wasn’t on the block.

I’ve very clearly proven he was by using sources. Get over yourself. You’re trying to cling to something that has not one iota or relevance to your original argument to, in my view, try to save some face for being so blatantly wrong.

Enjoy being wrong and ignored from here out out.

You're going to ignore me forever? Wow, what a gift! Thank you!