SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Changes in Faber of

Créé par: Quillanrocks
Équipe: 2021-22 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 23 juin 2021
Publié: 24 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
- Captain gets paid.
- Makar's BIG money deal gets kicked down the road for 2 seasons.
- Grubauer accepts less than what is offered on open market
- Seattle expansion is utilized to remove a distraction and make room for others
- A key player is traded to make room for Byram, free up dollars to add elsewhere.
- Colorado adds 3 players that played to at least the conference finals in both the past 2 seasons, and another with 3 cups in just over a decade.
- For fun (and grit, and energy), Colorado adds the son of a Colorado legend

- Colorado is still deep, with stocked cupboards and countless ways to improve. They are set up to go for it the next 2 years AND prepared to re-up both Mackinnon and Makar in 2023.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 650 000 $
26 750 000 $
21 450 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
67 800 000 $
33 250 000 $
45 900 000 $
21 500 000 $
22 650 000 $
1875 000 $
1825 000 $
1855 000 $
1800 000 $
1840 000 $
1890 000 $
11 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
COL
    Expansion Draft Considerations
    SEA
    1. Helleson, Drew [Liste de réserve]
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (COL)
    3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (COL)
    Détails additionnels:
    -- The 2023 3rd round pick is conditional to Colorado winning the Stanley Cup in either of the next 2 seasons.
    2.
    COL
    SEA
    1. Kadri, Nazem
    Détails additionnels:
    Expansion Draft Selection
    3.
    COL
    1. Killorn, Alex
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
    TBL
    1. Bowers, Shane
    2. Nichushkin, Valeri (1 250 000 $ retained)
    4.
    COL
    1. Faber, Brock [Liste de réserve]
    2. Lemieux, Brendan
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (LAK)
    4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (LAK)
    Détails additionnels:
    -- The 2023 1st round pick converts to a 2024 1st round pick if in the top 3.
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de COL
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de COL
    2022
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    2023
    Logo de COL
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de COL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2181 500 000 $82 802 297 $1 741 463 $3 350 000 $-1 302 297 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    7 800 000 $7 800 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    908 333 $908 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    725 000 $725 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    C
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
    G
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    3 166 667 $3 166 667 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    DG/DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    24 juin 2021 à 18 h 52
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 14,543
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,138
    Can't see Colorado trading Girard unless a massive payday comes back.
    hockeyconnor97 et Quillanrocks a aimé ceci.
    24 juin 2021 à 18 h 53
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 6,430
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,488
    This is proposal makes me sad. I love Faber, but this is a great proposal for a team desperately trying to find a #1D that doesn't break the bank.
    24 juin 2021 à 19 h 5
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2017
    Messages: 8,440
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
    To be blunt I think all of those moves are terrible for the Avs
    Foppa21 a aimé ceci.
    24 juin 2021 à 19 h 13
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 20,030
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
    Those are just awful moves,

    Avs aren’t trading nuke for a 1 year rental
    They aren’t exposing kadri and paying for him to be taken

    Since you are over the cap looks like you traded girard based on the comments and get is the last thing they would do
    24 juin 2021 à 19 h 14
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 1,727
    Mentions "j'aime": 918
    I doubt the Avs do the lightning trade. Killorn is great but the lightning will likely get fleeced in a Killorn deal.
    24 juin 2021 à 19 h 23
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 1,124
    Mentions "j'aime": 436
    Quoting: coga16
    Those are just awful moves,

    Avs aren’t trading nuke for a 1 year rental
    They aren’t exposing kadri and paying for him to be taken

    Since you are over the cap looks like you traded girard based on the comments and get is the last thing they would do


    You're right. I'm so not worthy. I DID trade Girard, just wanted to edit so Kings give more for him. He's gone again. Lash me
    24 juin 2021 à 19 h 30
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 20,030
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
    Quoting: Quillanrocks
    You're right. I'm so not worthy. I DID trade Girard, just wanted to edit so Kings give more for him. He's gone again. Lash me


    If your goal was to make the avs worse, congrats
    24 juin 2021 à 19 h 32
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 1,124
    Mentions "j'aime": 436
    Quoting: Florida_Man_Maroon
    I doubt the Avs do the lightning trade. Killorn is great but the lightning will likely get fleeced in a Killorn deal.


    Exactly why I thought Colorado would make a great trading partner. Why not offer something that doesn't totally suck. Colorado's prospect pool is arguably the deepest in the NHL; it's conceivable that they'd be less concerned with squeezing the Lightning for every ounce of blood, and more concerned with adding proven playoff experience. Colorado still wins this trade, so why not, I say! But that's me
    Florida_Man_Maroon a aimé ceci.
    24 juin 2021 à 19 h 33
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 1,124
    Mentions "j'aime": 436
    Modifié 24 juin 2021 à 19 h 43
    Quoting: coga16
    If your goal was to make the avs worse, congrats


    Their d-corp IS worse. Don't know what I was thinking. You're not confident Byram can step in, though?? You see any positive moves from my AGM??
    24 juin 2021 à 19 h 36
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 1,124
    Mentions "j'aime": 436
    Quoting: moli92
    To be blunt I think all of those moves are terrible for the Avs


    Not one good one, hey? What would you change? And yes, never should have traded Girard. I'm aware and BOY do I regret it.
    24 juin 2021 à 19 h 41
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 1,124
    Mentions "j'aime": 436
    Quoting: coga16
    Those are just awful moves,

    Avs aren’t trading nuke for a 1 year rental
    They aren’t exposing kadri and paying for him to be taken

    Since you are over the cap looks like you traded girard based on the comments and get is the last thing they would do


    Why wouldn't they expose Kadri? Get him off the books to add pieces that they hope help lead them to the promised land. (?)
    24 juin 2021 à 19 h 53
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2017
    Messages: 8,440
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
    Quoting: Quillanrocks
    Not one good one, hey? What would you change? And yes, never should have traded Girard. I'm aware and BOY do I regret it.


    Kadri is better than whoever SEA would take with a normal protection list so it doesnt make sense to expose him let alone pay SEA to take him

    Nichushkin is very strong defensively and although Killorn is good it doesnt make sense to take the player with the higher cap hit and retain 1.25M on top of that. Plus Bowers is more valuable and closer to an NHL role than a 3rd round pick

    Girard and Donskoi are both good players with good contracts. It doesnt make sense to move both of those assets for a downgrade at forward and picks that are 2-3 years away. Plus the value is just way off

    For the most part the contracts seem reasonable but Id rather sign Makar long term. 2 years is the worst possible term since thats the same offseason they would need to extend MacKinnon and sign Byram and Newhook after their ELCs end

    The Francouz buyout also doesnt make much sense since he only has 1 year left and when healthy is worth every penny of his contract plus more
    24 juin 2021 à 19 h 56
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 40,118
    Mentions "j'aime": 18,340
    Ron Francis leans back, cigar in mouth, and laughs
    24 juin 2021 à 20 h 11
    #14
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 1,124
    Mentions "j'aime": 436
    Quoting: moli92
    Kadri is better than whoever SEA would take with a normal protection list so it doesnt make sense to expose him let alone pay SEA to take him

    Nichushkin is very strong defensively and although Killorn is good it doesnt make sense to take the player with the higher cap hit and retain 1.25M on top of that. Plus Bowers is more valuable and closer to an NHL role than a 3rd round pick

    Girard and Donskoi are both good players with good contracts. It doesnt make sense to move both of those assets for a downgrade at forward and picks that are 2-3 years away. Plus the value is just way off

    For the most part the contracts seem reasonable but Id rather sign Makar long term. 2 years is the worst possible term since thats the same offseason they would need to extend MacKinnon and sign Byram and Newhook after their ELCs end

    The Francouz buyout also doesnt make much sense since he only has 1 year left and when healthy is worth every penny of his contract plus more


    To listen to a lot of Avs fans, the animosity with Kadri suggested he needed to go. But I see your point.

    Would you make the Nichushkin / Killorn trade if Bowers weren't involved? I was never too impressed with Nichushkin. And Donskoi is drastically overpaid, don't you think?

    I figured they'd just kick Makar's big money extension down the road when Johnson comes off the books. (?) In fact, a lot of the Avs contracts, my additions included, come off the books in 2 years. . . Figured this was their window to win before big money goes to MacKinnon, Makar or anyone else. . . when it will get harder to build around them.

    But that's just my thinking. Thanks for your input. If I may say, I don't get the feeling there's much appetite for change on your end. Are you happy if they come back with pretty much the same roster?
    24 juin 2021 à 20 h 34
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2017
    Messages: 8,440
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
    Quoting: Quillanrocks
    To listen to a lot of Avs fans, the animosity with Kadri suggested he needed to go. But I see your point.

    Would you make the Nichushkin / Killorn trade if Bowers weren't involved? I was never too impressed with Nichushkin. And Donskoi is drastically overpaid, don't you think?

    I figured they'd just kick Makar's big money extension down the road when Johnson comes off the books. (?) In fact, a lot of the Avs contracts, my additions included, come off the books in 2 years. . . Figured this was their window to win before big money goes to MacKinnon, Makar or anyone else. . . when it will get harder to build around them.

    But that's just my thinking. Thanks for your input. If I may say, I don't get the feeling there's much appetite for change on your end. Are you happy if they come back with pretty much the same roster?


    Even if Kadri were to go he still has value and a 2C would have to be brought in to replace him. He wouldnt be given away for nothing let alone paying SEA to take him. And tbh I havent seen much animosity towards him from Avs fans anyway

    No Nichushkin is one of the Avs best defensive players and is on a fantastic contract. regardless of the Bowers/3rd swap this doesnt make sense to do for a team that is close to the cap. How is Donskoi overpaid? Under 4M AAV for a guy who was on pace to score 50 points in an 82 game season is pretty good. Hes outperformed guys like Arvidsson the past 2 seasons and everyone thinks Arvidssons contract is great

    If they bridge Makar Id expect it to be 3 years to avoid that huge offseason, but imo a long term deal is better for both parties. The cap savings from not doing the Killorn/Nichuskin trade alone should cover most of the AAV difference between this and a long term deal anyway which avoids the headache of having to sign the best 2 players and best 2 prospects on the team in the same offseason

    Im not opposed to some changes but I dont think they need to change much, especially not core players. They were the best team in the regular season and even in the Vegas series they outplayed them in 3 of the 6 games without their 2C and it couldve gone either way
    Quillanrocks a aimé ceci.
    24 juin 2021 à 20 h 45
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 1,727
    Mentions "j'aime": 918
    Quoting: Quillanrocks
    Exactly why I thought Colorado would make a great trading partner. Why not offer something that doesn't totally suck. Colorado's prospect pool is arguably the deepest in the NHL; it's conceivable that they'd be less concerned with squeezing the Lightning for every ounce of blood, and more concerned with adding proven playoff experience. Colorado still wins this trade, so why not, I say! But that's me


    You make a good point however Sakic counts his pennies and makes sure to maximize value for the Avalanche. He’s not known for giving up prospects.
    Quillanrocks a aimé ceci.
    24 juin 2021 à 20 h 50
    #17
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 1,124
    Mentions "j'aime": 436
    Quoting: Florida_Man_Maroon
    You make a good point however Sakic counts his pennies and makes sure to maximize value for the Avalanche. He’s not known for giving up prospects.


    What was fan reaction like when he traded 2 second rounders for Toews? I know they're not prospects. (yet!) Just curious; I am fairly new to CapFriendly
    24 juin 2021 à 20 h 59
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 1,727
    Mentions "j'aime": 918
    Quoting: Quillanrocks
    What was fan reaction like when he traded 2 second rounders for Toews? I know they're not prospects. (yet!) Just curious; I am fairly new to CapFriendly


    The value was absolutely great for Colorado. Took advantage of Islanders cap situation and got a great defenseman for cheap. Avs fans certainly loved the deal. Definitely a possibility we see Sakic try and do something similar with a Tampa player like Killorn and get him for cheap. Although I think the value in this trade is indeed fair, I’d expect Sakic to try and give up the least amount possible.
    Quillanrocks a aimé ceci.
    25 juin 2021 à 15 h 23
    #19
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 56
    Mentions "j'aime": 6
    Jost is not getting that kind of money.
    25 juin 2021 à 15 h 31
    #20
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 1,124
    Mentions "j'aime": 436
    Quoting: avaholic21
    Jost is not getting that kind of money.


    When compared to the pay structure of the players around him, looks pretty fair. I think he gets at least what Nichushkin's making and definitely not less than 2 million. It's only a 2 year deal . . . time to see if he keeps taking steps forward. A lot of money comes off the books in time for MacKInnon's 12 million!
    25 juin 2021 à 15 h 37
    #21
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 56
    Mentions "j'aime": 6
    Quoting: Quillanrocks
    When compared to the pay structure of the players around him, looks pretty fair. I think he gets at least what Nichushkin's making and definitely not less than 2 million. It's only a 2 year deal . . . time to see if he keeps taking steps forward. A lot of money comes off the books in time for MacKInnon's 12 million!


    Nuke >> Jost. Jost tops is about 3 x $2M. I could easily see him getting 2 x 1.875M

    I am not a fan of keeping Jost around for anything in the top 9 unless he plays W. Today he is a 4C max but has limitations in the FO dot. If he could improve there, then that really opens doors for his future.
    Quillanrocks a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage