SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Captain Jack trade

Créé par: mbaer84
Équipe: 2021-22 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 24 juin 2021
Publié: 24 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Comtois, Maxime [Droits de RFA]
  2. Drysdale, Jamie
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
and another prospect or pick another year.
2.
BUF
  1. Rathbone, Jack
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
trade 3rd overall down to 9. VAN gets the other Hughes. BUF needs a goalie prospect and at 9 will get either one of the top ones. No need to go after centers because next few drafts are loaded at the top with high end ones. This way the load up on D and G who take longer to develop.
VAN
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BUF
Logo de VAN
Logo de BUF
Logo de BOS
Logo de FLA
Logo de MTL
Logo de BUF
Logo de MTL
Logo de BUF
Logo de COL
Logo de BUF
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1281 500 000 $39 313 916 $113 916 $2 550 000 $42 186 084 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 050 000 $3 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
889 166 $889 166 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 juin 2021 à 14 h 12
#1
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Honestly I like this deal
24 juin 2021 à 14 h 14
#2
Sabres fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 4,719
Mentions "j'aime": 2,955
The Vancouver trade just isn’t good. If you’re downgrading from number three overall to number nine you’re getting a prospect you want not one you don’t need in Rathbone. Buffalo has more than enough young defensemen already, and they’re about to draft Owen Power too. Too bad Vancouver doesn’t have a forward prospect worth going after, because they’re never giving up Podkolzin.
sabres89 et Sabresfan7 a aimé ceci.
24 juin 2021 à 14 h 19
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,920
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
It's a fair offer for the Van deal. I think Van passes because they don't have enough prospects.
24 juin 2021 à 14 h 22
#4
Démarrer sujet
matt
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 602
Mentions "j'aime": 220
Quoting: Tjm220
The Vancouver trade just isn’t good. If you’re downgrading from number three overall to number nine you’re getting a prospect you want not one you don’t need in Rathbone. Buffalo has more than enough young defensemen already, and they’re about to draft Owen Power too. Too bad Vancouver doesn’t have a forward prospect worth going after, because they’re never giving up Podkolzin.


umm not really. They have Dahlin on the left and Henri on the right and thats it. Samulesonn is maybe good but hes a big lumbering D.
Dahlin/Power
Rathbone/Drysdale
whoever/Henri

thats a legit D in 3-4 years with a high end goalie.
24 juin 2021 à 14 h 23
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,124
Mentions "j'aime": 6,131
LOL we don't need left d. Pick a better forward prospect, and let's never mention taking a goalie at 9 again.
Lenny54 a aimé ceci.
24 juin 2021 à 14 h 27
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,124
Mentions "j'aime": 6,131
Quoting: mbaer84
umm not really. They have Dahlin on the left and Henri on the right and thats it. Samulesonn is maybe good but hes a big lumbering D.
Dahlin/Power
Rathbone/Drysdale
whoever/Henri

thats a legit D in 3-4 years with a high end goalie.


Ahh. I see. Except our left side is dahlin, power (also lhd), Bryson (team really likes him), samuelsson, Ryan Johnson (recent first rounder), and most likely McCabe on a short term deal to show he can still play after an awful leg injury. Right side could use a prospect or two, but we need forward prospects more. This is a no brainer- take Guenther or Eklund at 3 and not take a goalie at 9 plus a d prospect that we don't need, like at all.
Lenny54 et Tjm220 a aimé ceci.
24 juin 2021 à 15 h 2
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,179
Mentions "j'aime": 1,067
Getting another Hughes is intriguing, I would definitely mull over this proposal for a while. If you wanted a forward prospect instead of Rathbone I guess the only reasonable option would be Hoglander. If Vancouver feels they're giving up too much it might have to be Lind/Gadjovich + a pick or something.
24 juin 2021 à 15 h 10
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 434
Mentions "j'aime": 73
Don't see the Ducks getting Eichel, not without help from another team. All they have to offer is Drysdale and Zegras, and word is they aren't willing to include either. I would look to Columbus, Calgary or, most likely, Colorado.
24 juin 2021 à 15 h 12
#9
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
I think Van are pretty high on Rathbone and honestly Luke Hughes doesn't seem like that great of a prospect, nor is he an organizational need. We have a decent left defense and need defensive or all around dmen not offensive. I wouldn't be surprised if Hughes is there at 9.
24 juin 2021 à 15 h 29
#10
Sabres fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 4,719
Mentions "j'aime": 2,955
Quoting: BigShoots
I think Van are pretty high on Rathbone and honestly Luke Hughes doesn't seem like that great of a prospect, nor is he an organizational need. We have a decent left defense and need defensive or all around dmen not offensive. I wouldn't be surprised if Hughes is there at 9.

I’d be very surprised if Hughes lasted beyond number five, or wherever New Jersey is picking.
24 juin 2021 à 15 h 34
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 309
Mentions "j'aime": 60
since im one of the few canucks fans on this site thats not rock hard for hughes #2, id pass. Weird draft with low exposure, id rather have a lower pick and a player on the cusp of making the team than another lottery ticket
25 juin 2021 à 23 h 10
#12
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
Quoting: Tjm220
I’d be very surprised if Hughes lasted beyond number five, or wherever New Jersey is picking.


He may very well go before but why do people always think that organizations want to have brothers play together? People are always proposing deals to get the Hughes bros together and it just never happens. Like has it ever happened? The Sedin's but that actually made sense given they were twins and played cerebrally together. Teams just take the BPA or an organizational need. Not the brother of a player on their team.
25 juin 2021 à 23 h 21
#13
Sabres fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 4,719
Mentions "j'aime": 2,955
Quoting: BigShoots
He may very well go before but why do people always think that organizations want to have brothers play together? People are always proposing deals to get the Hughes bros together and it just never happens. Like has it ever happened? The Sedin's but that actually made sense given they were twins and played cerebrally together. Teams just take the BPA or an organizational need. Not the brother of a player on their team.

Luke Hughes also happens to fit an organizational need for New Jersey anyway.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage