SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

LCM Habs Future

Créé par: CareyPrice301
Équipe: 2021-22 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 23 juin 2021
Publié: 23 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3800 000 $
2800 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 250 000 $
31 800 000 $
2750 000 $
2875 000 $
2850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
33 000 000 $
45 500 000 $
11 250 000 $
44 250 000 $
12 500 000 $
1750 000 $
2750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
    Selects Drouin, and takes a 1st and 3rd
    SEA
    1. Drouin, Jonathan
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (MTL)
    3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (WSH)
    2.
    MTL
    1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    2022
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    2023
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $71 945 120 $597 561 $1 475 000 $9 554 880 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    875 000 $875 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    2 343 750 $2 343 750 $
    DD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
    DD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
    DG
    RFA - 1
    750 000 $750 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    23 juin 2021 à 21 h 49
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 4,294
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,325
    Yes from NJ
    Wreckless a aimé ceci.
    23 juin 2021 à 22 h 0
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2019
    Messages: 1,058
    Mentions "j'aime": 457
    I don’t understand the Chiarot trade. Why not just keep him and not sign Goligoski….Chiarot is better than Goligoski anyways
    23 juin 2021 à 22 h 18
    #3
    Wreckless
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 3,334
    Mentions "j'aime": 437
    Quoting: Lochness1202
    I don’t understand the Chiarot trade. Why not just keep him and not sign Goligoski….Chiarot is better than Goligoski anyways


    Trade Chiarot who shut down Matthews & Marner, Jets elite forwards, and Stone & co. so that you can pay Danault more than Pageau who has 13 points so far these playoffs at the same time as being a shutdown C?

    Oh, but I guess it’s not fair to only look at one season. Danault has 1 career playoff goal vs. 23 for Pageau.

    $3.5mm is the right number for Danault.
    BorisBagel a aimé ceci.
    23 juin 2021 à 23 h 24
    #4
    Boris Bagel
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2016
    Messages: 2,791
    Mentions "j'aime": 587
    Quoting: Lochness1202
    I don’t understand the Chiarot trade. Why not just keep him and not sign Goligoski….Chiarot is better than Goligoski anyways


    A lot better
    28 juin 2021 à 13 h 2
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    LastClutchMan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 8
    Mentions "j'aime": 0
    Quoting: Lochness1202
    I don’t understand the Chiarot trade. Why not just keep him and not sign Goligoski….Chiarot is better than Goligoski anyways


    I don't believe so, chiarot has played well in playoffs, but there were large parts in the regular season where chiarot made lots of questionable plays, goligoski gives more mobility, however I have not watched too much of goligoski, so my analysis of him could be off.
    28 juin 2021 à 13 h 9
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    LastClutchMan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 8
    Mentions "j'aime": 0
    Quoting: Wreckless
    Trade Chiarot who shut down Matthews & Marner, Jets elite forwards, and Stone & co. so that you can pay Danault more than Pageau who has 13 points so far these playoffs at the same time as being a shutdown C?

    Oh, but I guess it’s not fair to only look at one season. Danault has 1 career playoff goal vs. 23 for Pageau.

    $3.5mm is the right number for Danault.


    When Adam Lowry is getting paid 3.5 mil, it is clear danault will want more. No knock on lowry's skill, but the defensive impact he provides is not as efficent or as visible as danault. Lowry was given time to play as 1c whenever players went injured, and his defense was not anything noteworthy, neither was his offense, 3.5 mil is around what scott laughton and adam lowry got paid recently. Phillip Danault is a player in the range of pageau in projected salary wise, however pageau gives you a good offense and good defense, but while danault is centering the shutdown first line that held stone to zero points, matthews to 1 goal, and there is absolutely no denial danault played a much larger part than chiarot in defending these marquee players. Also to add on to danault, yes his offense is snakebitten this year, but he had had more 40+ point seasons than pageau on his track record, his offensive role has diminished this year, and his defensive duties have increased, there is reasoning behind why his offense has decreased. You don't win these series with danault being able to anchor that shutdown first line, because no other center on that team has reached that level of defensive play as a center as of yet. Keeping him is important to team structure. Maintaining this center depth can be the key to consistent success for the future of the canadiens.
    28 juin 2021 à 13 h 11
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    LastClutchMan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 8
    Mentions "j'aime": 0
    Quoting: BorisBagel
    A lot better


    What makes you believe chiarot is much better, yes he's been great in the playoffs, but he made multiple blunders, and had poor stretches in the regular season. Goligoski has better mobility and transition play. Chiarot always tends to dump teh puck in, goligoski as far as I've seen is able to transition the puck better. Weber as he is aging, needs a puck moving dman on his side that is also not inexperienced. This is a bridge to future puck movers that will be ready within 2 years to play with the canadiens, in norlinder/struble/harris, though struble is known to be a bit hitter, he has good mobility to back it up.
    28 juin 2021 à 13 h 13
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    LastClutchMan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 8
    Mentions "j'aime": 0
    Quoting: jrdroge25
    Yes from NJ


    I figured that ryan murray was on his way out as I was seeing rumours, so thought this could be a destination IF chiarot gets traded to fill in a similar role of a defensive dman/agitator.
    29 juin 2021 à 15 h 24
    #9
    Wreckless
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 3,334
    Mentions "j'aime": 437
    Quoting: CareyPrice301
    When Adam Lowry is getting paid 3.5 mil, it is clear danault will want more. No knock on lowry's skill, but the defensive impact he provides is not as efficent or as visible as danault. Lowry was given time to play as 1c whenever players went injured, and his defense was not anything noteworthy, neither was his offense, 3.5 mil is around what scott laughton and adam lowry got paid recently. Phillip Danault is a player in the range of pageau in projected salary wise, however pageau gives you a good offense and good defense, but while danault is centering the shutdown first line that held stone to zero points, matthews to 1 goal, and there is absolutely no denial danault played a much larger part than chiarot in defending these marquee players. Also to add on to danault, yes his offense is snakebitten this year, but he had had more 40+ point seasons than pageau on his track record, his offensive role has diminished this year, and his defensive duties have increased, there is reasoning behind why his offense has decreased. You don't win these series with danault being able to anchor that shutdown first line, because no other center on that team has reached that level of defensive play as a center as of yet. Keeping him is important to team structure. Maintaining this center depth can be the key to consistent success for the future of the canadiens.


    I agree fully that Danault will want more. What you want, and what you get however, are not necessarily the same thing. Put Danault on a team without Price and without our top 4 shutdown D, and all of a sudden he doesn’t look like quite as good of a shutdown center anymore.

    Explain to me how Danault is more critical at shutting down Matthews than Chiarot? Last time I checked, centers battle with opposing D when trying to score in close far more than opposing centers. Plus Danault plays less minutes than Chiarot/Edmundson.

    I fully agree with you that keeping Danault would be important. But that’s contingent on him being willing to accept a contract that’s also palatable to the team and our overall salary structure.

    I guarantee you that Bergevin is prepared to let Danault walk if he’s unwilling to be reasonable. He’s not irreplaceable. We could also replace him with a more offensive center like Granlund, possibly for less money.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage