SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Good

Créé par: BadBadgers
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 21 juin 2021
Publié: 21 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
3900 000 $
3900 000 $
66 500 000 $
35 500 000 $
89 375 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
1800 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Reinhart, Sam [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (MTL)
BUF
  1. Rathbone, Jack
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
2.
VAN
  1. Manson, Josh (1 600 000 $ retained)
ANA
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
Conditional 2022 pick if he resigns
3.
4.
VAN
CHI
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $75 825 659 $648 780 $1 050 000 $5 674 341 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
9 375 000 $9 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
450 000 $450 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 juin 2021 à 14 h 57
#1
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,602
Mentions "j'aime": 9,693
It'll cost more to shed Loui. Not a 1st, but likely another 2nd. The Hawks could just sign Janmark (or equivalent) and trade him at the TDL for a 2nd & 3rd, AND still have $3M in cap to work with.
sporkknife a aimé ceci.
21 juin 2021 à 15 h 2
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,138
Mentions "j'aime": 5,938
Getting Manson in division with retention easily costs at least 1st whether hes worth that or not

Bob Murray values him way too much
21 juin 2021 à 15 h 6
#3
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,414
Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
I’m not sure how good Rathbone is but I would guess the 3rd coming back wouldn’t be there. And I think you gotta add another piece for Manson especially with retention. The Eriksson trade would just be about the year of the pick and the team taking him on. But overall this is pretty good. Just about some of the details cleaned up.
21 juin 2021 à 15 h 9
#4
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,414
Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
Quoting: Salzy
Getting Manson in division with retention easily costs at least 1st whether hes worth that or not

Bob Murray values him way too much


I disagree. GMBM has proved he’s willing to make plenty of trades with VAN. And while he does value Manson I think the possibility of him being traded is rather high and I expect he realizes the price isn’t what he asked for at the deadline.
sporkknife a aimé ceci.
21 juin 2021 à 15 h 16
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,138
Mentions "j'aime": 5,938
Quoting: Jah1722
I disagree. GMBM has proved he’s willing to make plenty of trades with VAN. And while he does value Manson I think the possibility of him being traded is rather high and I expect he realizes the price isn’t what he asked for at the deadline.


I just cant see him trading Manson in-division for any less this offseason, not saying I think he's worth that at all, he isnt worth that but I dont see Murray moving him in-division for under-market value, especially with retention, alot of teams would line up with offers that beat this quite easily, realistically a 3rd round pick is nothing in the NHL more times than not

Mansons value actually can fluctuate quite a bit imo, lets say we keep him until after the expansion draft and then whatever team would trade for him wouldnt need to protect him, that would raise his value, especially since we can take cap back on top of retaining, I'd be shocked if we dont get approximately a first in value for him.

Manson has more value than Kase had, I feel like if Manson gets moved it would be in a deal similar to that so we maximize his value
sporkknife a aimé ceci.
21 juin 2021 à 15 h 18
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 129
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Can someone fill me in on Rathbone?
21 juin 2021 à 15 h 23
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 2,771
Mentions "j'aime": 1,386
Don't see VAN moving Rathbone.
21 juin 2021 à 15 h 26
#8
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,414
Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
Quoting: Salzy
I just cant see him trading Manson in-division for any less this offseason, not saying I think he's worth that at all, he isnt worth that but I dont see Murray moving him in-division for under-market value, especially with retention, alot of teams would line up with offers that beat this quite easily, realistically a 3rd round pick is nothing in the NHL more times than not

Mansons value actually can fluctuate quite a bit imo, lets say we keep him until after the expansion draft and then whatever team would trade for him wouldnt need to protect him, that would raise his value, especially since we can take cap back on top of retaining, I'd be shocked if we dont get approximately a first in value for him.

Manson has more value than Kase had, I feel like if Manson gets moved it would be in a deal similar to that so we maximize his value


I agree the 3rd isn’t enough. I’m just not sure a 1st is the price either. I also think GMBM would look at a prospect in return over just picks. So I think the price would be based on the quality of the prospect. If Juolevi was a RHD, he and the 3rd would work.

I agree the price would fluctuate a bit based on when the trade occurs. Mainly that before the expansion draft some of the value would actually be in who replaces him in the protected list.

I also disagree with the division rival part mainly based on the fact that there’s been a few trades between teams. I don’t think the price would increase just based on it being VAN.
Salzy a aimé ceci.
21 juin 2021 à 22 h 15
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
The 23' 2nd does nothing for us.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage