SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trade Talks getting serious

Créé par: trentbarney
Équipe: 2020-21 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 17 juin 2021
Publié: 17 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
TSN Hockey Insider Pierre LeBrun wrote in The Athletic Wednesday that conversations between the Buffalo Sabres and teams interested in the star centre are "getting more intense and serious."

LeBrun notes that the Sabres will be expecting to receive a 2021 first-round pick as part of their return for Eichel, putting the timeline for a deal ahead of the July 23 NHL Draft. He lists the Los Angeles Kings, Minnesota Wild, Anaheim Ducks, Columbus Blue Jackets, Philadelphia Flyers and New York Rangers among the many clubs that could make sense as a landing spot.


Just some ideas.
WHO GETS HIM? AND WHAT DOES IT COST?
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Comtois, Maxime
  2. Drysdale, Jamie
  3. Terry, Troy
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
ANA
    Eichel
    2.
    BUF
    1. Werenski, Zachary
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CBJ)
    CBJ
      Eichel
      3.
      BUF
      1. Kaliyev, Arthur
      2. Turcotte, Alex
      3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (LAK)
      LAK
        Eichel
        4.
        BUF
        1. Boldy, Matthew
        2. Dumba, Matt
        3. Rossi, Marco
        4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (MIN)
        MIN
          Eichel
          5.
          BUF
          1. Kakko, Kaapo
          2. Shesterkin, Igor
          3. Strome, Ryan
          4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (NYR)
          NYR
            Eichel
            6.
            BUF
            1. Konecny, Travis
            2. Patrick, Nolan
            3. Rubtsov, German
            4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (PHI)
            PHI
              Eichel
              Rachats de contrats
              Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
              Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
              2021
              Logo de BUF
              Logo de ANA
              Logo de CBJ
              Logo de LAK
              Logo de MIN
              Logo de NYR
              Logo de PHI
              Logo de BUF
              Logo de BOS
              Logo de FLA
              Logo de MTL
              Logo de BUF
              Logo de MTL
              Logo de BUF
              Logo de COL
              Logo de BUF
              2022
              Logo de BUF
              Logo de BUF
              Logo de BUF
              Logo de BUF
              Logo de BUF
              Logo de BUF
              2023
              Logo de BUF
              Logo de BUF
              Logo de BUF
              Logo de BUF
              Logo de BUF
              Logo de BUF
              Logo de BUF
              TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
              4081 500 000 $106 568 248 $1 487 500 $11 377 500 $-25 068 248 $
              Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
              AG, AD
              NMC
              UFA - 7
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
              AD
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
              AD
              M-NTC
              UFA - 3
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              3 050 000 $3 050 000 $
              AD, AG
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
              C
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
              C
              UFA - 3
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
              AG, AD
              UFA - 3
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
              C, AG
              UFA - 3
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              700 000 $700 000 $
              AD, AG
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              700 000 $700 000 $
              AG, AD
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              874 125 $874 125 $
              AG, C
              RFA - 1
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              700 000 $700 000 $
              AG, C
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              845 000 $845 000 $
              AG, C
              RFA - 1
              Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
              925 000 $925 000 $
              AD, AG
              RFA - 4
              Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
              1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
              AD
              UFA - 3
              Logo de Rangers de New York
              925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
              AD
              RFA - 2
              Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
              820 000 $820 000 $
              AG
              RFA - 1
              Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
              5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
              AD, AG
              UFA - 5
              Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
              925 000 $925 000 $
              C
              RFA - 4
              Logo de Wild du Minnesota
              880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
              AD, AG
              UFA - 3
              Logo de Wild du Minnesota
              925 000 $925 000 $
              C
              RFA - 5
              Logo de Rangers de New York
              4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
              AD, C
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
              894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
              C
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
              874 125 $874 125 $
              C, AD
              UFA - 1
              Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
              DG/DD
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
              DD
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
              G
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              889 166 $889 166 $
              DG/DD
              RFA - 2
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
              DD
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
              G
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              700 000 $700 000 $
              DG/DD
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
              DD
              RFA - 1
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
              G
              RFA - 2
              Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
              925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
              DD
              RFA - 3
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              864 166 $864 166 $
              DD
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              725 000 $725 000 $
              G
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
              5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
              DG
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              700 000 $700 000 $
              G
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Wild du Minnesota
              6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
              DD
              UFA - 3
              Logo de Rangers de New York
              925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
              G
              UFA - 1
              Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
              DG/DD
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
              AG, C
              UFA - 3
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
              C
              UFA - 6
              Équipe de réserve
              Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
              700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
              DG
              UFA - 1

              Code d'intégration

              • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
              • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

              Texte intégré

              Cliquer pour surligner
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 0
              #26
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: nov. 2018
              Messages: 5,135
              Mentions "j'aime": 5,933
              Quoting: Caerii
              That sounds a lot more like Friedman not actually knowing what type of offer is on the table, rather than him confirming they could be in an offer.


              reading can be hard sometimes tears of joy BUF fans are starting to get delusional tears of joy
              TheMooterus a aimé ceci.
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 0
              #27
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: déc. 2019
              Messages: 1,101
              Mentions "j'aime": 623
              Quoting: Caerii
              That sounds a lot more like Friedman not actually knowing what type of offer is on the table, rather than him confirming they could be in an offer.


              Exactly. Much different from "they are 100% off the table in any trade"
              MontrealMan a aimé ceci.
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 1
              #28
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: août 2020
              Messages: 5,306
              Mentions "j'aime": 3,373
              Quoting: LindyRuffRider
              Exactly. Much different from "they are 100% off the table in any trade"


              It's also a lot closer to them being off the table, especially if others have already reported they are, than it is to them being in play.

              Friedman saying "I don't know" and other reporters saying "they're off the table" tends to mean they're off the table.
              TheMooterus a aimé ceci.
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 2
              #29
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: déc. 2019
              Messages: 1,101
              Mentions "j'aime": 623
              Quoting: Salzy
              So he didnt say they are in play, thanks for proving my point for me. It has 100% been reported they are off the table, they have made it clear they are not trading either of them

              Reading is important. He 100% did not say they are available. end of story


              Never said they were in play. I said they may be in play. Much different from your "100% off the table".

              Reading is important.
              MontrealMan a aimé ceci.
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 3
              #30
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: déc. 2019
              Messages: 1,101
              Mentions "j'aime": 623
              Quoting: Caerii
              It's also a lot closer to them being off the table, especially if others have already reported they are, than it is to them being in play.

              Friedman saying "I don't know" and other reporters saying "they're off the table" tends to mean they're off the table.


              It's a lot closer to nobody knowing whether they're in play or not. If they were completely off the table then Friedman would've said it.
              MontrealMan a aimé ceci.
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 7
              #31
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: nov. 2018
              Messages: 5,135
              Mentions "j'aime": 5,933
              Quoting: LindyRuffRider
              Never said they were in play. I said they may be in play. Much different from your "100% off the table".

              Reading is important.



              They are not in play it is 100% already reported. Just stop tears of joy
              TheMooterus a aimé ceci.
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 8
              #32
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: déc. 2019
              Messages: 1,101
              Mentions "j'aime": 623
              Quoting: Salzy
              They are not in play it is 100% already reported. Just stop tears of joy


              It's hilarious when CapFriendly users think they know more than insiders lmao.
              MontrealMan a aimé ceci.
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 9
              #33
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: nov. 2018
              Messages: 5,135
              Mentions "j'aime": 5,933
              Quoting: LindyRuffRider
              It's hilarious when CapFriendly users think they know more than insiders lmao.


              Speak for yourself. 4th period already reported they are off the table. I know what im talking about while you clearly have no idea

              lmao
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 12
              #34
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: déc. 2019
              Messages: 1,101
              Mentions "j'aime": 623
              Quoting: Salzy
              Speak for yourself. 4th period already reported they are off the table. I know what im talking about while you clearly have no idea

              lmao


              Me or you have no clue what is being offered. Friedman just said he doesn't know and they may or may not be in play. I forgot though. CapFriendly user Salzy knows more than Friedman.
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 17
              #35
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: nov. 2018
              Messages: 5,135
              Mentions "j'aime": 5,933
              Quoting: LindyRuffRider
              Me or you have no clue what is being offered. Friedman just said he doesn't know and they may or may not be in play. I forgot though. CapFriendly user Salzy knows more than Friedman.


              Yeah because I'm the one that reported they are off the table, it definitely wasn't well-respected insider David Pagnotta that said "The Ducks have made it clear Drysdale and Zegras are untouchable"

              But I forgot LindyRuffRider saying Friedman said I dont know trumps a report like that
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 21
              #36
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: déc. 2019
              Messages: 1,101
              Mentions "j'aime": 623
              Quoting: Salzy
              Yeah because I'm the one that reported they are off the table, it definitely wasn't well-respected insider David Pagnotta that said "The Ducks have made it clear Drysdale and Zegras are untouchable"

              But I forgot LindyRuffRider saying Friedman said I dont know trumps a report like that


              And well-respected insider Friedman just countered that with they may or may not be play.

              If the insiders aren't in agreement that they're 100% off the table. You sure as sheet don't know either.
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 24
              #37
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: nov. 2018
              Messages: 5,135
              Mentions "j'aime": 5,933
              Quoting: LindyRuffRider
              And well-respected insider Friedman just countered that with they may or may not be play.

              If the insiders aren't in agreement that they're 100% off the table. You sure as sheet don't know either.


              He didnt counter he said I dont know. Pagnotta flat out said it is clear they are not in play

              Saying I dont know means he doesnt know either way.

              Pagnotta saying the are clearly not in play means they are clearly not in play

              Pagnotta has very good connections in SoCal, Ill take him saying in absolute they are off the table over Friedman saying he has no idea

              I know I have no inside connections, just like you dont. Ill take a reporter flat out saying it is clear they are off the table over one saying he has no idea
              TheMooterus a aimé ceci.
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 29
              #38
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: août 2020
              Messages: 5,306
              Mentions "j'aime": 3,373
              Quoting: LindyRuffRider
              And well-respected insider Friedman just countered that with they may or may not be play.

              If the insiders aren't in agreement that they're 100% off the table. You sure as sheet don't know either.


              But he didn't say "they may or may not be", he said "I don't know".

              If you and I are talking about our mutual friend Steve, wondering if he's coming to the hockey game with us this weekend, and you said "I don't know, he may or may not be", and I talked to Steve earlier today, and he told me he's not coming, so I say "No, he's not coming", that doesn't mean he may or may not be coming to the game, it means you didn't know that he's not coming to the game.
              Salzy et TheMooterus a aimé ceci.
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 30
              #39
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: nov. 2018
              Messages: 5,135
              Mentions "j'aime": 5,933
              Quoting: Caerii
              But he didn't say "they may or may not be", he said "I don't know".

              If you and I are talking about our mutual friend Steve, wondering if he's coming to the hockey game with us this weekend, and you said "I don't know, he may or may not be", and I talked to Steve earlier today, and he told me he's not coming, so I say "No, he's not coming", that doesn't mean he may or may not be coming to the game, it means you didn't know that he's not coming to the game.


              Stop you're using logic, that doesn't work on here
              TheMooterus a aimé ceci.
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 31
              #40
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: déc. 2019
              Messages: 1,101
              Mentions "j'aime": 623
              Quoting: Salzy
              He didnt counter he said I dont know. Pagnotta flat out said it is clear they are not in play

              Saying I dont know means he doesnt know either way.

              Pagnotta saying the are clearly not in play means they are clearly not in play

              Pagnotta has very good connections in SoCal, Ill take him saying in absolute they are off the table over Friedman saying he has no idea

              I know I have no inside connections, just like you dont. Ill take a reporter flat out saying it is clear they are off the table over one saying he has no idea


              If they were 100% off the table then Friedman would've said it, but he didn't.
              Friedman absolutely has very good connections with Anaheim too.

              I wouldn't say with 100% certainty of anything when Friedman isn't sure.
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 37
              #41
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: nov. 2018
              Messages: 5,135
              Mentions "j'aime": 5,933
              Quoting: LindyRuffRider
              If they were 100% off the table then Friedman would've said it, but he didn't.
              Friedman absolutely has very good connections with Anaheim too.

              I wouldn't say with 100% certainty of anything when Friedman isn't sure.


              Not if he doesnt know. He said he doesnt know. He didnt say they might be, he flat out said he does not know

              Pagnotta said he knows it is CLEAR (I know thats a very hard word to understand thats why I bolded it for you) they are off the table

              Clear
              Adjective
              -easy to understand, hear, read, or see:
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 40
              #42
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: déc. 2019
              Messages: 1,101
              Mentions "j'aime": 623
              Quoting: Caerii
              But he didn't say "they may or may not be", he said "I don't know".

              If you and I are talking about our mutual friend Steve, wondering if he's coming to the hockey game with us this weekend, and you said "I don't know, he may or may not be", and I talked to Steve earlier today, and he told me he's not coming, so I say "No, he's not coming", that doesn't mean he may or may not be coming to the game, it means you didn't know that he's not coming to the game.


              He said, "they could be idk"

              That's why it's dumb to say I'm 100% sure of something, when one of the most trusted insiders isn't sure. If they were 100% untouchable then he would've said it. He doesn't know and neither do I.
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 43
              #43
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: déc. 2019
              Messages: 1,101
              Mentions "j'aime": 623
              Quoting: Salzy
              Not if he doesnt know. He said he doesnt know. He didnt say they might be, he flat out said he does not know

              Pagnotta said he knows it is CLEAR (I know thats a very hard word to understand thats why I bolded it for you) they are off the table

              Clear
              Adjective
              -easy to understand, hear, read, or see:


              If they were 100% untouchable Friedman would've said it, but he DIDN'T. He said, "could be but idk".
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 43
              #44
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: août 2020
              Messages: 5,306
              Mentions "j'aime": 3,373
              Quoting: LindyRuffRider
              He said, "they could be idk"

              That's why it's dumb to say I'm 100% sure of something, when one of the most trusted insiders isn't sure. If they were 100% untouchable then he would've said it. He doesn't know and neither do I.


              But another trusted insider has said they're 100% out, so what does that count for? Is it only because Friedman is saying what you want to hear at this point, or is Friedman the only trusted insider?
              Salzy a aimé ceci.
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 45
              #45
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: nov. 2018
              Messages: 5,135
              Mentions "j'aime": 5,933
              Quoting: Caerii
              But another trusted insider has said they're 100% out, so what does that count for? Is it only because Friedman is saying what you want to hear at this point, or is Friedman the only trusted insider?


              It aint worth it, let them be ignorant tears of joy

              Some people dont like to use logic if it goes against what they want, heres a great example of that

              "Clear" isnt clear enough for some people, thats why the ignore list is on this site
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 46
              #46
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: nov. 2018
              Messages: 5,135
              Mentions "j'aime": 5,933
              Quoting: LindyRuffRider
              If they were 100% untouchable Friedman would've said it, but he DIDN'T. He said, "could be but idk".


              Keep living in denial, have a good life tears of joy
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 50
              #47
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: déc. 2019
              Messages: 1,101
              Mentions "j'aime": 623
              Quoting: Caerii
              But another trusted insider has said they're 100% out, so what does that count for? Is it only because Friedman is saying what you want to hear at this point, or is Friedman the only trusted insider?


              It counts as there isn't an agreement among insiders that they're 100% off the table. So we don't 100% know if they are or aren't.
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 54
              #48
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: déc. 2019
              Messages: 1,101
              Mentions "j'aime": 623
              Quoting: Salzy
              It aint worth it, let them be ignorant tears of joy

              Some people dont like to use logic if it goes against what they want, heres a great example of that

              "Clear" isnt clear enough for some people, thats why the ignore list is on this site


              It's actually a perfect example of you.

              You're ignoring what Friedman said, because it goes against what you want. You just want to listen to one insider with a spotty track record because he is saying what you want to hear. It's quite hilarious.

              Im 100% sUrE BeCaUsE PaGnOtTa SaId

              He's GoT CoNnEcTiOnS BrO

              FrIeDmAn DoEsN't KnOw
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 55
              #49
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: déc. 2019
              Messages: 1,101
              Mentions "j'aime": 623
              Quoting: Salzy
              Keep living in denial, have a good life tears of joy


              Denial of what? Saying that Friedman isn't sure and you getting butthurt that I said that?
              17 juin 2021 à 12 h 57
              #50
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: juin 2019
              Messages: 156
              Mentions "j'aime": 44
              Quoting: Salzy
              Not if he doesnt know. He said he doesnt know. He didnt say they might be, he flat out said he does not know

              Pagnotta said he knows it is CLEAR (I know thats a very hard word to understand thats why I bolded it for you) they are off the table

              Clear
              Adjective
              -easy to understand, hear, read, or see:


              Its gonna be real funny when Zegras gets traded and see all the Anaheim fans go nuts haha
               
              Répondre
              To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
              Question:
              Options:
              Ajouter une option
              Soumettre le sondage