SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Most id give up for these players

Créé par: theleano1
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 16 juin 2021
Publié: 16 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
For the trades Buffalo has zero leverage in trading Reinhart he will take them to arbitration and walk in 13 months Buffalo is getting a top 10 draft pick this year plus a b+ propsect while having zero levrage in a sitution, for all the leaf fans trading Riley to Van, an Offesive minded LHD is a position of strength for Van i get you guys want to shake things up a bit but anything else more then this years 2nd makes zero sense for Van
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
37 000 000 $
36 000 000 $
55 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
21 250 000 $
22 250 000 $
2750 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Reinhart, Sam [Droits de RFA]
BUF
  1. Lind, Kole [Droits de RFA]
  2. Roussel, Antoine
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
3.
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $75 750 659 $648 780 $1 050 000 $5 749 341 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
786 111 $786 111 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
783 333 $783 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 juin 2021 à 21 h 34
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,956
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Come on dude. If you're going to do something like this at least clean up with a moist towelette afterwards...
16 juin 2021 à 21 h 35
#2
Démarrer sujet
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 4,976
Mentions "j'aime": 4,044
Quoting: RedWing9119
Come on dude. If you're going to do something like this at least clean up with a moist towelette afterwards...


This is more so to shut up leaf fans but okay
16 juin 2021 à 21 h 41
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,956
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: theleano1
This is more so to shut up leaf fans but okay


Well anything to shut up leaf fans is okay.
theleano1 a aimé ceci.
16 juin 2021 à 21 h 42
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,526
Mentions "j'aime": 491
only a second for Rielly is laughable
16 juin 2021 à 21 h 43
#5
Démarrer sujet
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 4,976
Mentions "j'aime": 4,044
Quoting: PrimeDatsyuk
only a second for Rielly is laughable


And leaf fans asking for this years first and hoglander is laughable
PeterForsberg21 et cooliny a aimé ceci.
16 juin 2021 à 21 h 55
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,179
Mentions "j'aime": 1,068
I wouldn't give up 9th OA for Reinhart but I would for Reilly with an extension.
17 juin 2021 à 6 h 28
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,451
Mentions "j'aime": 330
Quoting: Canucks33
I wouldn't give up 9th OA for Reinhart but I would for Reilly with an extension.


your nuts - where does rielly fit on this team
18 juin 2021 à 16 h 9
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,179
Mentions "j'aime": 1,068
Quoting: yztnuK
your nuts - where does rielly fit on this team


Hughes - Hamonic/UFA
Reilly - Schmidt
Rathbone - Myers
Juolevi, Bowey

Move Myers next offseason
18 juin 2021 à 18 h 27
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,451
Mentions "j'aime": 330
Quoting: Canucks33
Hughes - Hamonic/UFA
Reilly - Schmidt
Rathbone - Myers
Juolevi, Bowey

Move Myers next offseason


Rielly needs and deserves PP1 time.
Hughes plays 80% of the powerplay with the PP1 unit.
You are not bumping BH, BB, EP or Miller off for Rielly
Rathbone has the skill set to quarterback PP2.

Once I ask you, where does Rielly fit on this team?

Cause at $6m++++ I don’t
theleano1 a aimé ceci.
19 juin 2021 à 16 h 59
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,179
Mentions "j'aime": 1,068
Quoting: yztnuK
Rielly needs and deserves PP1 time.
Hughes plays 80% of the powerplay with the PP1 unit.
You are not bumping BH, BB, EP or Miller off for Rielly
Rathbone has the skill set to quarterback PP2.

Once I ask you, where does Rielly fit on this team?

Cause at $6m++++ I don’t


Reilly would be on PP2 for sure, but he and Schmidt would be our best pair at 5 on 5. He would be a play driving defenseman pushing the puck up ice along with Schmidt. He's not a top shut down guy but he's not bad defensively.

Adding Reilly would cement our defense core as a two-way unit for better or worse. We would have no pure shut down, defensive specialists (outside Hughes' partner), but everyone on that blue line can push play with their skating or puck movement. It would definitely be different than the traditional defense core, but it's a more modern one where everyone can skate. If the right system can be implemented it could be deadly, but play without the puck would have to be continuously improved.

Who knows if it will work or not, but that would definitely give the defense and the team an identity.
19 juin 2021 à 20 h 27
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,451
Mentions "j'aime": 330
Quoting: Canucks33
Reilly would be on PP2 for sure, but he and Schmidt would be our best pair at 5 on 5. He would be a play driving defenseman pushing the puck up ice along with Schmidt. He's not a top shut down guy but he's not bad defensively.

Adding Reilly would cement our defense core as a two-way unit for better or worse. We would have no pure shut down, defensive specialists (outside Hughes' partner), but everyone on that blue line can push play with their skating or puck movement. It would definitely be different than the traditional defense core, but it's a more modern one where everyone can skate. If the right system can be implemented it could be deadly, but play without the puck would have to be continuously improved.

Who knows if it will work or not, but that would definitely give the defense and the team an identity.


Cool so you would waste 8 million on a 2nd pair dman who plays less then 20% of the power play

Benning. That you?
19 juin 2021 à 20 h 39
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,179
Mentions "j'aime": 1,068
Quoting: yztnuK
Cool so you would waste 8 million on a 2nd pair dman who plays less then 20% of the power play

Benning. That you?


I wouldn't want him at 8M, that's too rich. Somewhere around 7M and ideally closer to 6M would be required for his next contract, otherwise I wouldn't do it. If that means it doesn't happen then that's fine too.

But in crunch time we could just run a top-4 of Hughes, Reilly, Schmidt and Myers/Hamonic/UFA. That's pretty good.
19 juin 2021 à 22 h 30
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,451
Mentions "j'aime": 330
Quoting: Canucks33
I wouldn't want him at 8M, that's too rich. Somewhere around 7M and ideally closer to 6M would be required for his next contract, otherwise I wouldn't do it. If that means it doesn't happen then that's fine too.

But in crunch time we could just run a top-4 of Hughes, Reilly, Schmidt and Myers/Hamonic/UFA. That's pretty good.


His cap comparables are North of $7m, is a PP quarterback and 1 pair dman with all the rank and privileges that come with that.

He is a complete wasted player and money for Vancouver and plain simple doesn’t fit. In the same way Barrie, Letang, Makar Carlson etc doesn’t fit on this team.

He is not the dman who changes this team for the better.
19 juin 2021 à 23 h 22
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,179
Mentions "j'aime": 1,068
Quoting: yztnuK
His cap comparables are North of $7m, is a PP quarterback and 1 pair dman with all the rank and privileges that come with that.

He is a complete wasted player and money for Vancouver and plain simple doesn’t fit. In the same way Barrie, Letang, Makar Carlson etc doesn’t fit on this team.

He is not the dman who changes this team for the better.


I'd be assuming that one way or another, Rielly chooses to come home (either by trade or Free Agency). If that happened, then we should be able to get him on a more team friendly contract. If he didn't, there would be a team that outbids us and throws him too much money.

If somehow acquired Makar for Boeser+, we would absolutely take it. Pay him and Hughes to carry a parrying, give them cheap complimentary partners with 3 good bottom pairing defenseman, that's a lethal defense. You take star talent at a position as important as RD and don't look back. If we would somehow sign a 27 year old Carlson to a team friendly deal, we should absolutely do it. Same with Letang if our GM likes him as a player. I don't like Barrie as a player so I would hope we never spend to get him lol.

Talent always changes the team for the better. I know your probably thinking of Toronto, but Matthews and Marner are on team crippling deals, not team friendly deals. Instead look at Tampa.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage