SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Win in Belleville Nothing Major

Créé par: Sens2030
Équipe: 2021-22 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 15 juin 2021
Publié: 16 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
10th overall pick, one of McTavish, Lysell or Sillinger
TDL L Brown and Dadonov flipped out.
Based on standings @ TDL pursue a S.Reinhart, Couturier, and/or Manson
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3800 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
65 500 000 $
87 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
2950 000 $
1950 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
23 000 000 $
1750 000 $
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
    expansion draft
    2.
    OTT
    1. Senyshyn, Zach [Droits de RFA]
    BOS
    1. Alsing, Olle [Droits de RFA]
    3.
    OTT
    1. De Haan, Calvin
    2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
    CHI
    1. Aspirot, Jonathan
    2. Brown, Joshua
    3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
    4.
    OTT
    1. Henrique, Adam (2 900 000 $ retained)
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
    ANA
    5.
    OTT
    1. Green, Luke [Droits de RFA]
    WPG
    1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (OTT)
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de OTT
    2022
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de SJS
    2023
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de NSH
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $64 653 000 $0 $4 057 500 $16 847 000 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    749 250 $749 250 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    -1 443 750 $-1 443 750 $
    AG, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
    AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    950 000 $950 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 4
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    950 000 $950 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    900 000 $900 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, AD, C
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    16 juin 2021 à 11 h 18
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,269
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,915
    Wouldn't Ottowa rather give playing time to bernard docker and Brandstrom over Dehaan and Oleksiak?
    IconicHawk a aimé ceci.
    16 juin 2021 à 11 h 22
    #2
    Go Jets Go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 5,433
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,178
    You may have Luke Green for a bag of potato chips.
    16 juin 2021 à 11 h 25
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 104
    Mentions "j'aime": 25
    Quoting: Wadejos123
    Wouldn't Ottowa rather give playing time to bernard docker and Brandstrom over Dehaan and Oleksiak?


    I think there is no rush for JBD and time in the AHL with Mann will be fantastic. Case and point development of Thomson from a year ago. Brannstrom needs to fight for a job and his defending is weak. Why not be the guy playing 20+ in the A and deserve a call up during the season. Bringing in bigger / viable defenders in Oleksiak and De Haan ensures Branny earn it. Not like last year with Coburn and Gudbranson as the vets to beat out....
    16 juin 2021 à 11 h 56
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 16,984
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,985
    Quoting: Sens2030
    I think there is no rush for JBD and time in the AHL with Mann will be fantastic. Case and point development of Thomson from a year ago. Brannstrom needs to fight for a job and his defending is weak. Why not be the guy playing 20+ in the A and deserve a call up during the season. Bringing in bigger / viable defenders in Oleksiak and De Haan ensures Branny earn it. Not like last year with Coburn and Gudbranson as the vets to beat out....


    Dude Brannstrom was better defensively than most of the guys who played D this year, and what clearly a valuable part of their breakout and an offensive contributor (on pace for 35 points in 82 games). He won't benefit at all from more time screwing around in a league he's clearly too good for. Only way he learns to improve his NHL defending is by defending in the NHL.
    16 juin 2021 à 12 h 0
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 16,984
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,985
    Quoting: Wadejos123
    Wouldn't Ottowa rather give playing time to bernard docker and Brandstrom over Dehaan and Oleksiak?


    JBD probably starts in Belleville, but Brannstrom is VERY clearly an NHL player to anyone who pays attention to anything beyond his height.
    16 juin 2021 à 12 h 6
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 135
    Mentions "j'aime": 40
    My hometown!
    16 juin 2021 à 12 h 59
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 104
    Mentions "j'aime": 25
    Quoting: Claesson4Norris
    Dude Brannstrom was better defensively than most of the guys who played D this year, and what clearly a valuable part of their breakout and an offensive contributor (on pace for 35 points in 82 games). He won't benefit at all from more time screwing around in a league he's clearly too good for. Only way he learns to improve his NHL defending is by defending in the NHL.


    Zub was a hell of defender all year and influenced that significantly. Branny is going to be a solid top 4 d and the addition of Mete helped the overall break out. I don't care if he's 6'4 or 5'9. Its called healthy competition to earn spots. He's 22 and if deserving he starts in the NHL vs the AHL. How is time screwing around in a professional league he didn't dominate, with a coach (who should have an NHL job) a bad thing?
    16 juin 2021 à 13 h 5
    #8
    Bedard23
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 9,292
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,473
    Quoting: Rooney
    You may have Luke Green for a bag of potato chips.


    Lol
    Rooney a aimé ceci.
    16 juin 2021 à 13 h 21
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 16,984
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,985
    Quoting: Sens2030
    Zub was a hell of defender all year and influenced that significantly. Branny is going to be a solid top 4 d and the addition of Mete helped the overall break out. I don't care if he's 6'4 or 5'9. Its called healthy competition to earn spots. He's 22 and if deserving he starts in the NHL vs the AHL. How is time screwing around in a professional league he didn't dominate, with a coach (who should have an NHL job) a bad thing?


    I don't know how you look at his season as a whole, especially the way it ended, and say Brannstrom hasn't shown he is at worst deserving of a regular top 6 role. He's absolutely earned his spot for next season.

    Also he absolutely did dominate in the AHL, what are you talking about? He was clearly far above the AHL in his brief stint this year, and he was totally a dynamic offensive threat last year too. He won't get better if he isn't being challenged. He needs to be in the NHL, and he very obviously will be.
    16 juin 2021 à 15 h 18
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 2,455
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,085
    The team already came out and said theyre looking for a top 4 RD, adding two bottom 4 LD is a lateral move, maybe even a step back. You don't sign someone for 2x3m to be healthy competition. That player is expected to contribute at that dollar and term. Same goes for De Haan, if Mete and Brannstrom are ahead of them from the start of the year those moves look ridiculous. 7.5m in the pressbox is never a good thing.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage