SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Who says no to this

Créé par: Bdawwwgy1
Équipe: 2020-21 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 16 juin 2021
Publié: 16 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
CBJ
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Studnicka, Jack
  3. Vaakanainen, Urho
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
Vaak OR Stud - not both.
BOS
  1. Gavrikov, Vladislav
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (CBJ)
Détails additionnels:
Bostons president Cam Neely says a LHD is their biggest need.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CBJ
Logo de TBL
Logo de TOR
Logo de BOS
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de NJD
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
2022
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de TBL
Logo de CBJ
Logo de TOR
Logo de CBJ
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
2023
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2881 500 000 $68 337 578 $0 $2 232 500 $13 162 422 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 995 000 $4 995 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 325 000 $1 325 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
975 000 $975 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
897 500 $897 500 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 030 952 $2 030 952 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
725 000 $725 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
735 000 $735 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 633 333 $1 633 333 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 850 000 $5 850 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 juin 2021 à 9 h 30
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,786
Mentions "j'aime": 8,836
Boston laughs at that. Troll post?
16 juin 2021 à 9 h 35
#2
Démarrer sujet
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 4,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
Quoting: Gofnut999
Boston laughs at that. Troll post?


DeBrusk has aucked for a while now, Stud and Vaak max out as 3rd liner and 3rd pair D, and that first is late.

Gaveikov is also good and cheap for 2 years.
16 juin 2021 à 9 h 40
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,578
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
Bruins. It's not even close, Gavrikov is good but he is a 2nd pair D and there are other options.
Bdawwwgy1 a aimé ceci.
16 juin 2021 à 9 h 41
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,786
Mentions "j'aime": 8,836
Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
DeBrusk has aucked for a while now, Stud and Vaak max out as 3rd liner and 3rd pair D, and that first is late.

Gaveikov is also good and cheap for 2 years.



It’s a massive overpayment.

Debrusk straight up. 1st straight up. Is about max value. Boston won’t do the 1st.

Gavrikov is an ok 2nd pair. Not a stud.
16 juin 2021 à 9 h 41
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,500
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Boston says no
16 juin 2021 à 9 h 43
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
DeBrusk has aucked for a while now, Stud and Vaak max out as 3rd liner and 3rd pair D, and that first is late.

Gaveikov is also good and cheap for 2 years.


Debrusk sucked this year. That’s pretty much it. He had 19 goals in a shortened season the year before. There’s no reason to say that studnicka or vaakanainen max out at anything, or bottom out at anything.

This is a hard no. Neely probably wants to get bigger on the left side, but he probably wants the guy to be better.
16 juin 2021 à 9 h 43
#7
Démarrer sujet
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 4,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
Quoting: Gofnut999
It’s a massive overpayment.

Debrusk straight up. 1st straight up. Is about max value. Boston won’t do the 1st.

Gavrikov is an ok 2nd pair. Not a stud.


I disagree TBH but respect your answer. I think a 1st at least is imperative for Gavy
16 juin 2021 à 9 h 45
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,786
Mentions "j'aime": 8,836
Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
I disagree TBH but respect your answer. I think a 1st at least is imperative for Gavy


You can disagree all you want, Boston is not giving up a 1st for mid level dman. The rest is overkill.

Blues fans have offered Dunn for Debrusk. Avs offered Graves. Rather have either of them over Gavy and those were straight up hockey trades. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Bdawwwgy1 et Dekes a aimé ceci.
16 juin 2021 à 9 h 50
#9
Démarrer sujet
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 4,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
Quoting: Gofnut999
You can disagree all you want, Boston is not giving up a 1st for mid level dman. The rest is overkill.

Blues fans have offered Dunn for Debrusk. Avs offered Graves. Rather have either of them over Gavy and those were straight up hockey trades. 🤷🏻‍♂️


Thats true
16 juin 2021 à 9 h 54
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,851
Mentions "j'aime": 639
Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
Thats true


Also - Despite Debrusk being "awful for a while now" and a 5 goal season, he is still averaging 22.5 goals per 82gp. You realize this is the deal for Jones, right?
16 juin 2021 à 9 h 57
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,500
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
DeBrusk has aucked for a while now, Stud and Vaak max out as 3rd liner and 3rd pair D, and that first is late.

Gaveikov is also good and cheap for 2 years.


So Gav is good and cheap for 2 years, but you're willing to move him for (in your opinion)......

A guy whose sucked for a while
a depth player
late 1st

I'd think if he was good you could get more than a guy who sucks, a depth player and a late 1st, no?
16 juin 2021 à 10 h 16
#12
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,885
Mentions "j'aime": 1,047
Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
I disagree TBH but respect your answer. I think a 1st at least is imperative for Gavy


you overrate him he plays 2nd line minutes on one of the worst current defences, there is about atleast 4 better LHD in free agency not to mention if any one of those assets are being moved it will be for a solidified top pairing LHD dman, he is also isn't that big, 6'1 213 isn't some big shut down guy i think bruins are looking for someone more in the 6'3+ range. plus he had 69 hits in 55 games that doesn't scream much physicality which bruins need i think their was about 3-4 defenceman who out hit him still on boston. plus his 77 blocked shots isn't anything to ride home on either. I want nothing to do with gavrikov unless it require less then a first and definitely not adding debrusk stud or vaak
16 juin 2021 à 11 h 11
#13
Démarrer sujet
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 4,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
Quoting: Propeller09
Also - Despite Debrusk being "awful for a while now" and a 5 goal season, he is still averaging 22.5 goals per 82gp. You realize this is the deal for Jones, right?


Yeah about 25 teams would outbid us for Jones then
16 juin 2021 à 11 h 27
#14
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,646
Mentions "j'aime": 3,131
One of the more frustrating things that can happen in these sorts of trade discussions is when someone opts to propose that another team trade for their player at the price which their team would want for said player, while ignoring said player's value relative to the rest of the market.

Usually we're on the receiving end. For this one, we're on the giving end.

We don't have any particular motivation to move Gavrikov, so trading him would necessitate some kind of overpayment - but you can't just go around and start actively soliciting those kinds of overpayments. It's not cricket.
16 juin 2021 à 12 h 20
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,851
Mentions "j'aime": 639
Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
Yeah about 25 teams would outbid us for Jones then


Not sure about that. Coming off an (two, really) awful season with a very defensive coach. One year left before becoming UFA, a partial NTC and a rather decent pay raise who can dictate where they play in 12 months.

Also - a real Bruins trade for Jones would likely be Carlo and Debrusk.

Team control and asset management are very important with the flat cap. If we are talking about a team that he wants to play for moving forward with an extension in place, then he would get a lot more.
18 juin 2021 à 10 h 29
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 404
Mentions "j'aime": 40
This isn't even remotely close to equal value on the Bruins end. I'd rather have Seth Jones for a year and hope to resign him or Forsberg at the deadline.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage