SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Reinhart For Couture

Créé par: Dkollidas
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 14 juin 2021
Publié: 14 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
67 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 700 000 $
21 500 000 $
13 000 000 $
Transactions
SJS
  1. Reinhart, Sam [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
BUF
  1. Couture, Logan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $64 277 029 $0 $857 500 $17 222 971 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 juin 2021 à 15 h 7
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,507
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
I don't think the sabres should do that.
14 juin 2021 à 15 h 24
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 363
Mentions "j'aime": 159
Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
I don't think the sabres should do that.


The only plus to that trade and it's a big plus, is the 2022 pick might be Shane Wright. I'm giving the Sharks the 4th or 5th best odds on the #1 pick next year. I honestly believe Wright is gonna be a superstar in the NHL and I'd like as many chances to get him as I could.
Jdfitz77 a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2021 à 15 h 30
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 5,120
Mentions "j'aime": 1,850
Quoting: Buffalojonny
The only plus to that trade and it's a big plus, is the 2022 pick might be Shane Wright. I'm giving the Sharks the 4th or 5th best odds on the #1 pick next year. I honestly believe Wright is gonna be a superstar in the NHL and I'd like as many chances to get him as I could.


We should do this trade imo
1- we get that 2022 1st
2- even though Couture is too old to fit our new rebuild timeline, i think we can still flip him & get quite a lot for him-
especially if we hold some of his salary

Let’s do it
Go Sabres!
Buffalojonny a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2021 à 15 h 32
#4
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,684
Mentions "j'aime": 1,881
SJ is not trading another top 10 pick, especially if it's this.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2021 à 15 h 46
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 363
Mentions "j'aime": 159
Quoting: Jdfitz77
We should do this trade imo
1- we get that 2022 1st
2- even though Couture is too old to fit our new rebuild timeline, i think we can still flip him & get quite a lot for him-
especially if we hold some of his salary

Let’s do it
Go Sabres!


Agreed 👍 Go Sabres!
14 juin 2021 à 16 h 2
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,214
Mentions "j'aime": 2,867
Pretty bad for the Sharks. No doubt SJ needs to add in a Reinhart-Couture swap but that 1st is totally out of the question.
14 juin 2021 à 16 h 11
#7
thewookie1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,411
Mentions "j'aime": 1,014
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Pretty bad for the Sharks. No doubt SJ needs to add in a Reinhart-Couture swap but that 1st is totally out of the question.


I highly doubt anyone would touch that contract without that 1st
14 juin 2021 à 16 h 44
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,214
Mentions "j'aime": 2,867
Quoting: thewookie1
I highly doubt anyone would touch that contract without that 1st


In like 4 years maybe. At the moment he still has some positive value.
14 juin 2021 à 16 h 45
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
Logan plus a first for Marcus Davidson would be about fair right now.

Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
I don't think the sabres should do that.
I think this comment is correct.
Quoting: Jdfitz77
We should do this trade imo
1- we get that 2022 1st
2- even though Couture is too old to fit our new rebuild timeline, i think we can still flip him & get quite a lot for him-
especially if we hold some of his salary Let’s do it
Go Sabres!
I agree that Logan could be flipped if salary was retained.
Unfortunately, the trading history of our current GM leads me to believe he would settle for a second even with 50% retention.
If everything was equal Sam is at least a first more valuable than Logan.
Considering Logan's age and salary I think it would be a bad deal for Buffalo unless another first was included.
Quoting: thewookie1
I highly doubt anyone would touch that contract without that 1st
I agree and even more so.
GMTD a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2021 à 19 h 15
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 982
Mentions "j'aime": 491
lets not do this
14 juin 2021 à 20 h 40
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,507
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
Logan plus a first for Marcus Davidson would be about fair right now.

I think this comment is correct. I agree that Logan could be flipped if salary was retained.
Unfortunately, the trading history of our current GM leads me to believe he would settle for a second even with 50% retention.
If everything was equal Sam is at least a first more valuable than Logan.
Considering Logan's age and salary I think it would be a bad deal for Buffalo unless another first was included. I agree and even more so.


Sabres don't own Davidson anymore I don't think.
14 juin 2021 à 21 h 6
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
Sabres don't own Davidson anymore I don't think.
I know, that is why i inserted him into the trade as what it would take to move Logan.
Does that make sense?
GMTD a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2021 à 21 h 41
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 5,120
Mentions "j'aime": 1,850
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
Logan plus a first for Marcus Davidson would be about fair right now.

I think this comment is correct. I agree that Logan could be flipped if salary was retained.
Unfortunately, the trading history of our current GM leads me to believe he would settle for a second even with 50% retention.
If everything was equal Sam is at least a first more valuable than Logan.
Considering Logan's age and salary I think it would be a bad deal for Buffalo unless another first was included. I agree and even more so.


So you’d amend the trade to:

Sharks get Sam
and
Sabres get Couture, and TWO 1sts

Is that what u meant? I wasn’t sure
And that sounds great- i just don’t think it would happen
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2021 à 22 h 49
#14
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
Interesting idea but awkward fit for both teams Confused
15 juin 2021 à 1 h 28
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,181
Mentions "j'aime": 998
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Pretty bad for the Sharks. No doubt SJ needs to add in a Reinhart-Couture swap but that 1st is totally out of the question.


Buffalo has insider info that no other team has. Shane Wright will be drafted in 2022. SHHH dont tell anyone.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage