SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs 2022

Créé par: MauriceArthur15
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 14 juin 2021
Publié: 14 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
My new Leafs roster.

Toronto loses Kerfoot to expansion draft.

Toronto trade Engvall to Seattle for future considerations.

Toronto trades Morgan Rielly, Roni Hiroven and a 2nd for Christian Dvorak and Lawson Crouse. Toronto plays Morgan Rielly signing bonus saving 2 million plus whatever Crouse is owed in actual dollars. Rielly can either sign there long term or be traded at the deadline for a 1st. So that would make the trade 1st, a 2nd and a b-tier prospect. It a win for both teams as Airzona starts thier rebuild and Toronto get players in their effort to win now.

Toronto trades Dermotts rights for Jason Dickson rights. This is a trade for 2 teams with young players to trade them for a fresh starts. This trade might be undervalued. If so lmk what I should add to make it to even for Dallas.

Toronto trades Hutchinson for a 6th. TBL gets a backup lower than this year minimum.

Toronto signs Saad, Oleksiak, Getzlaf and Reimer.

Lmk what y’all think down below. Have a great day.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3850 000 $
3850 000 $
3850 000 $
3850 000 $
32 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
45 000 000 $
1750 000 $
11 000 000 $
1800 000 $
22 000 000 $
32 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
    Expansion Draft
    2.
    TOR
      Future considerations
      3.
      ARI
      1. Hirvonen, Roni [Liste de réserve]
      2. Rielly, Morgan
      3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
      Détails additionnels:
      Rielly signing bonus gets paid by the Leafs.

      Rielly get flipped at the deadline for a 1st. So the trades essentially 1st, 2nd and a b-tier prospect
      4.
      TOR
      1. Dickinson, Jason [Droits de RFA]
      DAL
      1. Dermott, Travis [Droits de RFA]
      Détails additionnels:
      A trade for 2 players who need a change of scenery. Travis Dermott still has potential to be a top 4 dman and can play both sides.

      Dickson can still be a top 6 centre but needs a fresh start.
      5.
      TOR
      1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2021
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de TOR
      2022
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de TBL
      Logo de TOR
      2023
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de TOR
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2281 500 000 $80 438 116 $0 $400 000 $1 061 884 $

      Formation

      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
      4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
      C
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
      C
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 4
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
      C, AG
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
      AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      796 667 $796 667 $
      AG, AD
      RFA - 3
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
      1 533 333 $1 533 333 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      750 000 $750 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
      DG
      NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      894 167 $894 167 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      DG/DD
      NTC
      UFA - 3
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
      DD
      RFA - 1
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      725 000 $725 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      800 000 $800 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      14 juin 2021 à 15 h 11
      #1
      True Reverse Retro
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2018
      Messages: 4,623
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
      Eh, Dickinson really hasn't shown anything that would indicate he's a top-6 option. He's much more suited for a bottom-6 role with the capability to fit into a top-6 role for brief periods (due to injury, trade, etc.). I wouldn't label him a "change of scenery" kind of guy, as he's never really struggled in Dallas. He's been pretty consistent throughout the course of his tenure in Dallas & honestly is already a better version of Radek Faksa.

      If I'm Dallas, I trade Faksa before I trade Dickinson
      MauriceArthur15 a aimé ceci.
      14 juin 2021 à 16 h 49
      #2
      Mdness94
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2020
      Messages: 137
      Mentions "j'aime": 9
      I think this is pretty realistic, I just think Arizona would want more only cause I think Dvorak is more valuable for 4 years remaining at a reasonable contract. I think you may need to add a B level prospect like Abramov or Abruzee but I think it's pretty realistic overall. I think I would prefer to keep Engvall over Mikey but if Mikey can actually learn to shoot better... he could easily score 10 breakaway goals at least.
      MauriceArthur15 a aimé ceci.
      14 juin 2021 à 16 h 53
      #3
      Démarrer sujet
      TopDawgReese
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 1,241
      Mentions "j'aime": 253
      Quoting: Mdness94
      I think this is pretty realistic, I just think Arizona would want more only cause I think Dvorak is more valuable for 4 years remaining at a reasonable contract. I think you may need to add a B level prospect like Abramov or Abruzee but I think it's pretty realistic overall. I think I would prefer to keep Engvall over Mikey but if Mikey can actually learn to shoot better... he could easily score 10 breakaway goals at least.


      One thing about the Dvorak contract is that it’s back loaded. This next year he’s owed 5 million and the last 3 years it’s like 6 million. The way John Chayka did those contracts was weird. Next year they have one of the highest actual dollar spent because of OEL, Keller and Chychuryn (I may have butchered that lol). It’s more of money save move than an actual value move. The one thing with Airzona we currently do know what direction they are going in. Whether is a rebuild, retool or try to win.
      14 juin 2021 à 21 h 8
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 5,286
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
      Dickie is most likely Seattle bait. Don’t really have a need for Dermott. I’d rather lose Faksa as stated above. Dickie is cheaper and more flexible. Doesn’t really need a change of scenery. He’s done everything the org has asked him to do. I do think he’s capable of more offense but I’d be shocked if it was 2C offense
      MauriceArthur15 a aimé ceci.
      14 juin 2021 à 21 h 24
      #5
      Démarrer sujet
      TopDawgReese
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 1,241
      Mentions "j'aime": 253
      Quoting: SlevinKalevra
      Dickie is most likely Seattle bait. Don’t really have a need for Dermott. I’d rather lose Faksa as stated above. Dickie is cheaper and more flexible. Doesn’t really need a change of scenery. He’s done everything the org has asked him to do. I do think he’s capable of more offense but I’d be shocked if it was 2C offense


      Quoting: SlevinKalevra
      Dickie is most likely Seattle bait. Don’t really have a need for Dermott. I’d rather lose Faksa as stated above. Dickie is cheaper and more flexible. Doesn’t really need a change of scenery. He’s done everything the org has asked him to do. I do think he’s capable of more offense but I’d be shocked if it was 2C offense


      Thanks for the feedback, heard really good thing about Dickson and taught of the trade. I think Faksa can and would work but to get the money going is gonna be hard on the Leafs. I do think Dermott would be a fit on your defence as he could play both sides and he still has the top 4 potential but was really never given a chance.
      15 juin 2021 à 11 h 15
      #6
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 5,286
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
      Quoting: MauriceArthur15
      Thanks for the feedback, heard really good thing about Dickson and taught of the trade. I think Faksa can and would work but to get the money going is gonna be hard on the Leafs. I do think Dermott would be a fit on your defence as he could play both sides and he still has the top 4 potential but was really never given a chance.


      We already have a lefty playing the right side with Miro. Nothing against Dermott, but I feel like Nill would rather have Oleksiak’s size. We also wouldn’t be able to protect Dermott and I feel like Seattle would take him over Dobby after a down year
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage