SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Mini Offseason

Créé par: RedWings35
Équipe: 2021-22 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 11 juin 2021
Publié: 11 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Dumba trade was for cap room
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
67 000 000 $
67 000 000 $
67 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Eichel, Jack (3 000 000 $ retained)
BUF
  1. Rossi, Marco
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (MIN)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
2.
MIN
  1. Brooks, Adam
  2. Engvall, Pierre
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de MIN
Logo de TOR
Logo de MIN
Logo de PIT
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de TOR
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $75 289 294 $0 $732 500 $6 210 706 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
825 833 $825 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 juin 2021 à 2 h 51
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,928
Mentions "j'aime": 2,670
Sabres decline
11 juin 2021 à 2 h 57
#2
Démarrer sujet
FutureGM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 302
Mentions "j'aime": 47
Quoting: SalamiCheese
Sabres decline


Interesting
11 juin 2021 à 7 h 55
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,878
Mentions "j'aime": 974
Eichel deal is not even close especially for retaining 3 mil
11 juin 2021 à 8 h 33
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 517
Mentions "j'aime": 366
You be better adding a cap dump at removing the retaining. If it a health concern the make the picks conditional
11 juin 2021 à 9 h 41
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 1,728
Mentions "j'aime": 458
Any Eichel trade has to have a young proven NHL center coming back the other way.

Starts with JEE, but it appears the wild don’t want to move him, so Eichel to MIN doesn’t make sense.
11 juin 2021 à 9 h 46
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,656
Mentions "j'aime": 1,904
Quoting: NeedTheCleanser
Any Eichel trade has to have a young proven NHL center coming back the other way.

Starts with JEE, but it appears the wild don’t want to move him, so Eichel to MIN doesn’t make sense.


I get where you’re coming from, but that’s a weird stipulation to be so rigid on when there are very few teams still considered in on Eichel. BUF is not gonna get what they want, if that’s the prevailing attitude.
RedWings35 et Lightman13 a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2021 à 10 h 43
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 1,728
Mentions "j'aime": 458
Quoting: drmantalban
I get where you’re coming from, but that’s a weird stipulation to be so rigid on when there are very few teams still considered in on Eichel. BUF is not gonna get what they want, if that’s the prevailing attitude.


If you don’t get what you want, don’t trade him and dare him to sit out and miss out on his money. Simple as that.
11 juin 2021 à 11 h 5
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,656
Mentions "j'aime": 1,904
Quoting: NeedTheCleanser
If you don’t get what you want, don’t trade him and dare him to sit out and miss out on his money. Simple as that.


I think you’re missing the point. There will be good offers on the table, but if you auto dismiss anything that doesn’t contain a young proven center, you’re being unnecessarily picky and potentially inviting a major headache situation to continue. BUF isn’t going to suddenly be competitive by getting a young center back. Get a good fair market package and move the heck on.
RedWings35 a aimé ceci.
13 juin 2021 à 14 h 5
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 1,728
Mentions "j'aime": 458
Quoting: drmantalban
I think you’re missing the point. There will be good offers on the table, but if you auto dismiss anything that doesn’t contain a young proven center, you’re being unnecessarily picky and potentially inviting a major headache situation to continue. BUF isn’t going to suddenly be competitive by getting a young center back. Get a good fair market package and move the heck on.


The best package includes a young proven NHL center. That’s my point.
13 juin 2021 à 14 h 9
#10
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,285
Mentions "j'aime": 4,472
No where near enough for Eichel
13 juin 2021 à 15 h 43
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,656
Mentions "j'aime": 1,904
Quoting: NeedTheCleanser
The best package includes a young proven NHL center. That’s my point.


Not necessarily true. Not at all. How are you not understanding that it’s possible to have a better, higher value package that doesn’t include a young proven center? You’re not being objective about things.
RedWings35 a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2021 à 11 h 17
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 1,728
Mentions "j'aime": 458
Quoting: drmantalban
Not necessarily true. Not at all. How are you not understanding that it’s possible to have a better, higher value package that doesn’t include a young proven center? You’re not being objective about things.


As soon as you trade Eichel/Reinhart that creates a gigantic org hole at center, so you need assets to fill that
14 juin 2021 à 11 h 47
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,656
Mentions "j'aime": 1,904
Quoting: NeedTheCleanser
As soon as you trade Eichel/Reinhart that creates a gigantic org hole at center, so you need assets to fill that


That’s not what is being argued. You have suggested multiple times that the best package includes a young nhl center. Which is not necessarily true. You may prefer that, but that doesn’t mean it’s objectively the highest value package. Just think about it for a second before auto defending your point.
RedWings35 a aimé ceci.
15 juin 2021 à 16 h 47
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 1,728
Mentions "j'aime": 458
Quoting: drmantalban
That’s not what is being argued. You have suggested multiple times that the best package includes a young nhl center. Which is not necessarily true. You may prefer that, but that doesn’t mean it’s objectively the highest value package. Just think about it for a second before auto defending your point.


“The best package” has to include consideration for position. It’s called the law of diminishing returns.

If you have 4 great Dmen, and a weak top6, and you are offered a forward and a dman exactly the same effectiveness, you take the forward. Trust me I’m thinking about this you pigeon lmao gtfoh
15 juin 2021 à 18 h 51
#15
Démarrer sujet
FutureGM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 302
Mentions "j'aime": 47
Quoting: NeedTheCleanser
“The best package” has to include consideration for position. It’s called the law of diminishing returns.

If you have 4 great Dmen, and a weak top6, and you are offered a forward and a dman exactly the same effectiveness, you take the forward. Trust me I’m thinking about this you pigeon lmao gtfoh


If hes a pigeon you’re a dump truck
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage