SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

San Jose 2022

Créé par: Theo_nollaf
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 8 juin 2021
Publié: 8 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Everyone knows the classic bad Sharks contracts. Couture, Burns, Karlsson, Edourad-Vlassic, Jones, but it's not just them. It feels like the sharks management forgot that bottom six forwards don't need anymore than 2 or 3 million on a 3 year deal. Contracts like that of Kevin Labanc and Radim Simek are also whats killing there salary cap. I've retained 50% of the Burns contract and given him to Seattleso though I still think the term is bad, the value of the contract is quite good. I've also bought out Logan Couture because he is getting paid 8 million unitl he's 38 and that's simply outrageous.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3785 000 $
3875 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 100 000 $
3750 000 $
31 250 000 $
3760 000 $
31 150 000 $
3750 000 $
3750 000 $
3750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 350 000 $
21 450 000 $
43 350 000 $
66 650 000 $
21 050 000 $
22 200 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
    Expansion
    SEA
    1. Gambrell, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
    2.
    SJS
    SEA
    1. Burns, Brent (4 000 000 $ retained)
    3.
    SJS
    1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (DET)
    4.
    SJS
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de COL
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de DET
    Logo de SJS
    2022
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de MIN
    2023
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2081 500 000 $66 729 807 $0 $967 500 $14 770 193 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    3 350 000 $3 350 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    776 667 $776 667 $ (Bonis de performance110 000 $$110K)
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
    G
    RFA - 1
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (1 125 000 $$1M1 125 000 $$1M)
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    866 667 $866 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AD
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    785 000 $785 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    G
    RFA

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    8 juin 2021 à 10 h 49
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 8,796
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
    They don’t. Burns is easily movable without retaining half though. Karlsson and Vlasic are unmovable. Couture is fine right now, although yeah he won’t be worth it by when it’s over but that’s a problem for the future
    8 juin 2021 à 10 h 50
    #2
    Kansler
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2019
    Messages: 363
    Mentions "j'aime": 228
    Someone suggested Karlsson -> Bobrovski. Had an interesting thing going. Bobi might bounce back as a legit 1st goalie, and honestly no-one is taking Eriks contract without shedding minimum 7-9 mill other way. Florida has enough goalie prospects, this way they could resign Driedger and play him and Knight.
    Theo_nollaf et areax91 a aimé ceci.
    8 juin 2021 à 10 h 52
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Barzals skateblade
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 235
    Mentions "j'aime": 59
    Quoting: papishark
    They don’t. Burns is easily movable without retaining half though. Karlsson and Vlasic are unmovable


    To be honest, I feel like If you only have one of Karlsson or Burns they'll suceed the problem is just having two offensive D-men who never can get a full opportunity. Since Burns is tradable, I've given the opportunity to Karlsson.
    FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
    8 juin 2021 à 10 h 54
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 8,796
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
    Quoting: Theo_nollaf
    To be honest, I feel like If you only have one of Karlsson or Burns they'll suceed the problem is just having two offensive D-men who never can get a full opportunity. Since Burns is tradable, I've given the opportunity to Karlsson.

    Problem isn’t the team composition, it’s the players. Karlsson has been bad. One of the worst defensive players in the league and Barely in the top 50 offensively
    Theo_nollaf et areax91 a aimé ceci.
    8 juin 2021 à 11 h 11
    #5
    Jetsfan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2017
    Messages: 7,974
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,585
    Would you retain 4M on Karlsson in a trade to the Jets?

    It's only 2M per year in actual money out as the July 1 signing bonus is most of it
    8 juin 2021 à 11 h 49
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Barzals skateblade
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 235
    Mentions "j'aime": 59
    Quoting: Jetman
    Would you retain 4M on Karlsson in a trade to the Jets?

    It's only 2M per year in actual money out as the July 1 signing bonus is most of it


    I really think that the Jets will have trouble finding the space. Most of their cap is locked up in forwards so trading some with a big cap hit there would be really tough especially if the Jets don't want to lose a core piece.
    8 juin 2021 à 11 h 54
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 8,796
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
    Quoting: Jetman
    Would you retain 4M on Karlsson in a trade to the Jets?

    It's only 2M per year in actual money out as the July 1 signing bonus is most of it

    No. The sharks simply can’t afford to lose 4 mil for 6 years. The best hope is seeing if he can be at all good, or hoping he retires or LTIR retires after another injury
    areax91 a aimé ceci.
    8 juin 2021 à 12 h 34
    #8
    Jetsfan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2017
    Messages: 7,974
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,585
    Quoting: Theo_nollaf
    I really think that the Jets will have trouble finding the space. Most of their cap is locked up in forwards so trading some with a big cap hit there would be really tough especially if the Jets don't want to lose a core piece.


    We have plenty of space... enough for a 8.5-9M Dman...but Karlsson is a waste at that much
    Theo_nollaf a aimé ceci.
    8 juin 2021 à 14 h 44
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,204
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
    Quoting: Theo_nollaf
    To be honest, I feel like If you only have one of Karlsson or Burns they'll suceed the problem is just having two offensive D-men who never can get a full opportunity. Since Burns is tradable, I've given the opportunity to Karlsson.


    This is what I’ve been saying for years. I completely agree.
    Theo_nollaf et areax91 a aimé ceci.
    9 juin 2021 à 0 h 39
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 5,588
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,001
    Sörensen is of no use to Detroit, they already have 9 waiver eligible wingers penned in for next year + Raymond and Berggren.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage