SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Beyond Pandemic

Créé par: imcnamara
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 4 juin 2021
Publié: 6 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Traded Marner and Rielly for a couple packages, each including at least one single player better than they are who cost much less, plus high potential young D. The firsts are a little optimistic but just whatever picks you want to sub in and the deal is still worth it. Signings are mostly very underrated bargain players.
Oh, yea, and I signed Hamilton out of FA.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1850 000 $
1850 000 $
1850 000 $
21 850 000 $
56 900 000 $
22 400 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
78 500 000 $
35 200 000 $
2900 000 $
11 100 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
21 100 000 $
21 100 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
TOR
  1. Jokiharju, Henri [Droits de RFA]
  2. Reinhart, Sam [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
3.
TOR
  1. Mangiapane, Andrew
  2. Välimäki, Juuso [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de BUF
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $80 988 450 $0 $0 $511 550 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
6 900 000 $6 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 juin 2021 à 12 h 55
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
this team deserves relegation to the AHL for having pierre engvall in the top 6
Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2021 à 12 h 56
#2
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,279
Mentions "j'aime": 10,619
Flames decline. Reilly is a rental. Mangiapane isn't for trade
Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2021 à 12 h 57
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,759
Mentions "j'aime": 5,255
To put it lightly, that Calgary deal is suboptimal for the Flames.
Sign_em_up000000 et Kingaman a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2021 à 12 h 58
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 27
Mentions "j'aime": 4
You just turned the leafs into a debatable lottery pick team.
6 juin 2021 à 13 h 3
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
this team deserves relegation to the AHL for having pierre engvall in the top 6


Engvall is a pretty decent player, but the idea is to optimize deployment by spreading talent around without leaving gaping holes. Totally fine to have him there.
6 juin 2021 à 13 h 4
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: ccandy29
You just turned the leafs into a debatable lottery pick team.


Debate whether you can make the moves or not, but this team is obviously better than this year's edition, which I think was quite possibly they're best team ever. Dumb comment.
6 juin 2021 à 13 h 6
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
To put it lightly, that Calgary deal is suboptimal for the Flames.


Doesn't mean they wouldn't do it. Teams pay a lot for middling D. Would have been much easier to trade for Andrew a year ago, but CGY D situation is getting dicey, and Sutter seems not to care for Valimaki. Rielly is pitched as a longer term solution and he's an Alberta guy, I think.
6 juin 2021 à 13 h 8
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Gmonwy
Flames decline. Reilly is a rental. Mangiapane isn't for trade


They might very well, but Rielly here would be pitched as a longer term solution to their D corps. It's not that crazy of a deal and they seem not to care much for Valimaki. Honestly, I'd do it for Mangiapane straight up but I think you could squeeze more out of them.
6 juin 2021 à 13 h 9
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,819
Mentions "j'aime": 623
Flames decline, Mangiapane and Valimaki together have way more value than Reilly
Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2021 à 13 h 10
#10
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,501
Mentions "j'aime": 22,667
Flames aren't doing that for one year of Reilly. And the Sabres aren't either. Sabres would be better trading Reinhart for assets, keeping Jokheri, their lottery pick for next season, and having 11m in cap to spend elsewhere instead of Marner
6 juin 2021 à 13 h 11
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,293
Mentions "j'aime": 19,540
major overvalue on Morgan Rielly
Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2021 à 13 h 11
#12
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,279
Mentions "j'aime": 10,619
Quoting: imcnamara
They might very well, but Rielly here would be pitched as a longer term solution to their D corps. It's not that crazy of a deal and they seem not to care much for Valimaki. Honestly, I'd do it for Mangiapane straight up but I think you could squeeze more out of them.


They wouldn't trade Valimaki for Mark Stone why would they trade him for Reilly? Also Mangiapane has made himself much more untouchable during the tournament going on
6 juin 2021 à 13 h 15
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 0
I've loved Mangiapane for about four years now, but if your opinion is changing about anyone because of their play in the Worlds then you shouldn't bother having strongly held opinions about player value.
6 juin 2021 à 13 h 16
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: palhal
Flames aren't doing that for one year of Reilly. And the Sabres aren't either. Sabres would be better trading Reinhart for assets, keeping Jokheri, their lottery pick for next season, and having 11m in cap to spend elsewhere instead of Marner


Rielly deal based on an extension. The Sabres would probably be delighted to trade for Marner without burning Eichel in the deal, and Reinhart wants out anyways. If they love Jokiharju so much, why don't they use him?
6 juin 2021 à 13 h 18
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Gmonwy
They wouldn't trade Valimaki for Mark Stone why would they trade him for Reilly? Also Mangiapane has made himself much more untouchable during the tournament going on


Not trading him for Stone was idiotic, but you bring it up as evidence that they would behave rationally now? Sutter stopped using Valimaki already. If he's staying he'd probably love to acquire Rielly.
6 juin 2021 à 13 h 42
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
To put it lightly, that Calgary deal is suboptimal for the Flames.


That is putting it very very lightly
6 juin 2021 à 13 h 46
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: imcnamara
Rielly deal based on an extension. The Sabres would probably be delighted to trade for Marner without burning Eichel in the deal, and Reinhart wants out anyways. If they love Jokiharju so much, why don't they use him?
Even with an extension the Flames say no without having to give it much thought. The first, sure, I get that, but Valimaki and Mangiapane and no bueno for Reilly.
6 juin 2021 à 13 h 49
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: imcnamara
Doesn't mean they wouldn't do it. Teams pay a lot for middling D. Would have been much easier to trade for Andrew a year ago, but CGY D situation is getting dicey, and Sutter seems not to care for Valimaki. Rielly is pitched as a longer term solution and he's an Alberta guy, I think.


He's from B.C. actually. This ain't it bud, try again.

Welcome to CF though.
6 juin 2021 à 13 h 52
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,293
Mentions "j'aime": 19,540
Quoting: imcnamara
Not trading him for Stone was idiotic, but you bring it up as evidence that they would behave rationally now? Sutter stopped using Valimaki already. If he's staying he'd probably love to acquire Rielly.


Not playing a rookie every game does not mean youve given up on them.
6 juin 2021 à 14 h 54
#20
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,501
Mentions "j'aime": 22,667
Quoting: imcnamara
Rielly deal based on an extension. The Sabres would probably be delighted to trade for Marner without burning Eichel in the deal, and Reinhart wants out anyways. If they love Jokiharju so much, why don't they use him?


Extensions? Mostly silly talk. I want to hear the discussion the Leafs have with Reilly. "We want your ass outta town, so hurry up and sign an extension, forgo your UFA next summer, just so we can trade you to Calgary." And when Reilly says no, that's so great for the Leafs and Reilly playing his last year as a Leaf.
6 juin 2021 à 16 h 21
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: palhal
Extensions? Mostly silly talk. I want to hear the discussion the Leafs have with Reilly. "We want your ass outta town, so hurry up and sign an extension, forgo your UFA next summer, just so we can trade you to Calgary." And when Reilly says no, that's so great for the Leafs and Reilly playing his last year as a Leaf.


I think any team you are talking to about Rielly would be willing to give up more if an extension were a part of it. It would be stupid not to discuss that with teams to maximize value and obviously Rielly has some say in the matter. Takes a real brainiac to note the latter, though, so thanks for the comment. Yes, Rielly would have some say in signing an extension. Leafs should totally give up on that, then, as all teams naturally would!
6 juin 2021 à 16 h 25
#22
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
He's from B.C. actually. This ain't it bud, try again.

Welcome to CF though.


I joined in 2016, BUD, (though who would care?) and tbh I don't care where Rielly is from. Doesn't really change what I'm saying. Keep popping in to tell people, "this ain't it," though, it's a very hip thing to say and sounds very natural coming from you. Adds a lot to the thread, thank you!
7 juin 2021 à 18 h 35
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: imcnamara
I joined in 2016, BUD, (though who would care?) and tbh I don't care where Rielly is from. Doesn't really change what I'm saying. Keep popping in to tell people, "this ain't it," though, it's a very hip thing to say and sounds very natural coming from you. Adds a lot to the thread, thank you!


I realize you joined in 2016, but you have 3 threads and 17 posts so you're still relatively new. Anyways, everyone on here said what I was going to say already. And you said this in your explanation...

''Traded Marner and Rielly for a couple packages, each including at least one single player better than they are who cost much less''

why would another team want a worse more expensive player than what they are giving up? Everyone on here is telling you it's bad, I'm not sure what you're not getting.
4 août 2021 à 13 h 33
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 27
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: imcnamara
Debate whether you can make the moves or not, but this team is obviously better than this year's edition, which I think was quite possibly they're best team ever. Dumb comment.


good work you signed a player who took more money to be in NJ, getting Mangiapane doesn't help much he's decent but I think you are overrating him. If your gonna trade rielly get a better return, I don't care about a mid to late first-rounder another Travis Dermott and Mangi for him. half the players you got would never sign and took more money
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage