SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flames 2022 - Major Overhaul

Créé par: slomo
Équipe: 2021-22 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 16 avr. 2021
Publié: 1 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Goodbye to the majority of the core forwards. Saw some magic with Brown, Henrique, Maggie at the World Championship. Bringing in some players with character, leadership and speed.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
3850 000 $
3900 000 $
2900 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1850 000 $
2850 000 $
2950 000 $
2950 000 $
56 000 000 $
42 500 000 $
43 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
44 000 000 $
31 000 000 $
32 000 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Comtois, Maxime [Droits de RFA]
  2. Henrique, Adam
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
2.
CGY
  1. Batherson, Drake [Droits de RFA]
  2. Brown, Connor
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (OTT)
3.
CGY
  1. Reinhart, Sam [Droits de RFA]
BUF
  1. Dubé, Dillon [Droits de RFA]
  2. Kylington, Oliver [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
4.
CGY
    Expansion Draft Deal
    SEA
    1. Lucic, Milan
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    2022
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    2023
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $66 093 750 $0 $0 $15 406 250 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
    AG, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AG
    RFA - 2
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    850 000 $850 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DG
    UFA
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    900 000 $900 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    900 000 $900 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    801 666 $801 666 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    900 000 $900 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    1 juin 2021 à 8 h 25
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 5,135
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,933
    Johnny is not worth that at all tears of joy tears of joy I'd rather keep Comtois and at worst the 4th overall pick the only way either of those get moved is for an Eichel/Marner type not Gaudreau
    palhal a aimé ceci.
    1 juin 2021 à 8 h 27
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 497
    Mentions "j'aime": 204
    BUF says no
    1 juin 2021 à 8 h 35
    #3
    GO FLAMES GO
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 18,211
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,557
    Tkachuk stays in a over haul
    1 juin 2021 à 9 h 20
    #4
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 59,074
    Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
    One year of Gaudreau isn't worth nearly that much to a non playoff team. You really over estimate the trade value of Tkachuk. He's a good player, but his notoriety by his antics doesn't necessarily increase his trade value. C'mon is he THAT much better than Brown and Batherson individually and you want a top ten pick too?
    Salzy a aimé ceci.
    1 juin 2021 à 9 h 32
    #5
    TkachukNorris79
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 1,256
    Mentions "j'aime": 377
    Quoting: palhal
    One year of Gaudreau isn't worth nearly that much to a non playoff team. You really over estimate the trade value of Tkachuk. He's a good player, but his notoriety by his antics doesn't necessarily increase his trade value. C'mon is he THAT much better than Brown and Batherson individually and you want a top ten pick too?


    This. Tkachuk will likely always be a better player than Batherson, but he's not THAT much better. Maybe like 15ish points better, and brings that "Tkachuk" element, but the difference is definitely not a top 10 pick AND elite 3rd liner Connor Brown. I'll take Drake and Brown at 9M combined over Tkachuk at 9M himself.

    I would love Matt Tkachuk in Ottawa and I think the top 10 pick would be available in addition to a pretty good roster player and prospect(s). But not adding a top young gun to the top 10 pick to get him. I'd rather just offer sheet him after next year lol
    palhal et PLDGEY a aimé ceci.
    1 juin 2021 à 11 h 7
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2019
    Messages: 3,524
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,235
    OTT declines
    8 juin 2021 à 13 h 22
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    slomo
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 747
    Mentions "j'aime": 89
    Quoting: Salzy
    Johnny is not worth that at all tears of joy tears of joy I'd rather keep Comtois and at worst the 4th overall pick the only way either of those get moved is for an Eichel/Marner type not Gaudreau


    Come on dreaming is allowed on this site isn't it? What would you suggest the Flames give up as well to get that package? I want Comtois as the base coming back with either Henrique or a 1st included.
    8 juin 2021 à 13 h 25
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 5,135
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,933
    Modifié 8 juin 2021 à 13 h 32
    Quoting: slomo
    Come on dreaming is allowed on this site isn't it? What would you suggest the Flames give up as well to get that package? I want Comtois as the base coming back with either Henrique or a 1st included.


    There isnt one, Gaudreau isnt a fit in ANA for Comtois alone let alone adding anything on top. Comtois only gets moved for an Eichel/Marner not a Gaudreau, hes a main building block for ANA and same is true for whoever is the 3 OA pick (Power, Eklund, Beniers, Clarke are the 4 most likely to me)

    Trading for Johnny is a win-now move and the Ducks are rebuilding, it just isnt anything near a fit

    That package is at the higher end of what ANA would give for Eichel, They arent trading for a guy who turns 28 in a month and a half
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage