SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Calgary Offseason

Créé par: drivet
Équipe: 2021-22 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 27 mai 2021
Publié: 27 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Let me know if any trade is unfair or makes no sense. Same goes with any signings. This is what I would try to do.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
2925 000 $
2800 000 $
2875 000 $
2925 000 $
22 500 000 $
21 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1875 000 $
1750 000 $
1900 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
SEA
  1. Kylington, Oliver [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Seattle signs Derek Ryan in FA, Kylington is the selection in the expansion draft, not too big of a loss now that Mackey jumped him in the depth chart.
2.
CGY
  1. Chytil, Filip [Droits de RFA]
  2. Skinner, Hunter
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (OTT)
NYR
  1. Monahan, Sean
Détails additionnels:
Rangers have been on the hunt for a center, but Kuznetsov is not the best option, and Eichel might be too much to ask for. Monahan isn't bad, he was injured this year but CGY needs to make a change. Two solid young players and a late-round pick seems fair to me, definitely let me know if it's not enough, too much, or just right.
3.
CGY
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Cheap depth piece. Draft pick is conditional, if Simon plays at least 30 games for leafs the 6th is transferred, if not no pick is transferred.
TOR
  1. Simon, Dominik [Droits de RFA]
4.
BOS
  1. Feuk, Lucas [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
Bruins have great depth at defense, Flames could use a 6th/7th defenseman. Give a late pick and low-level prospect. The 5th rounder can be conditional, if Clifton plays 41 games, the pick turns into a 4th rounder.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $63 889 166 $0 $15 000 $17 610 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
801 666 $801 666 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
875 000 $875 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
875 000 $875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 mai 2021 à 21 h 5
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
How does a late pick and a low level prospect help boston more than Clifton?
Gofnut999 et drivet a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2021 à 21 h 6
#2
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,211
Mentions "j'aime": 10,557
Gaudreau isn't a RW NYR declines
27 mai 2021 à 21 h 10
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 36
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
How does a late pick and a low level prospect help boston more than Clifton?


My thought was that it would give Urho Vaakanainen a spot to come in as I think he's ready and also it makes it so Clifton doesn't just fall down the depth chart or leave for nothing eventually. I could definitely be wrong about Vaakanainen though, and I completely understand why this wouldn't go through.
27 mai 2021 à 21 h 16
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: drivet
My thought was that it would give Urho Vaakanainen a spot to come in as I think he's ready and also it makes it so Clifton doesn't just fall down the depth chart or leave for nothing eventually. I could definitely be wrong about Vaakanainen though, and I completely understand why this wouldn't go through.


Well Clifton plays the right side for the most part (though he does play both), so Vaak isn’t necessarily blocked by him. Given how many injuries teams face, and how important Clifton has been in the playoffs this year, I’m guessing that the bruins would value him way way more than a late pick and low prospect. One of his primary talents is being able to sit out for a month and step in and be effective. Thats harder than many think. Even though his value is way below this, i’m guessing it takes a 2nd to pry him from boston. A 5th round pick and a low prospect doesn’t offset the possibility of playing a dman you don’t want to play in the playoffs.
drivet a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2021 à 21 h 20
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
No need for Clifton, just resign Stone, he looked great coming back
27 mai 2021 à 22 h 29
#6
Servant of Chaos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 1,108
Mentions "j'aime": 450
Monahan is basically a worse Strome. Pass.
28 mai 2021 à 0 h 36
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,652
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
No thanks
28 mai 2021 à 0 h 56
#8
GM CRIME DAWG
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 4,926
Mentions "j'aime": 2,687
Clifton is the epitome of team guy...no trade.

Plays hard, sits, plays hard again.
No whine, no drama, CF$ contract, RD undersized w/ huge heart - personifies depth and team-1st-player..
28 mai 2021 à 1 h 46
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Rangers decline pretty easily
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage