SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Boston if they werent dumb

Créé par: hutlife
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 20 mai 2021
Publié: 20 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
picks represent players from the trade who are retired
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
DAL
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
6.
VGK
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
7.
TOR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
8.
ARI
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
37956 000 000 $133 721 838 $964 222 $2 590 000 $822 278 162 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Islanders de New York
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
6 800 000 $6 800 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 850 000 $9 850 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 250 000 $$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance100 000 $$100K)
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 mai 2021 à 15 h 38
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,883
Mentions "j'aime": 11,894
Boston fans, I'm begging you. Move on
KennyBoi et arafay a aimé ceci.
20 mai 2021 à 15 h 40
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,132
Mentions "j'aime": 4,976
They wouldn't have Hamilton or Seguin if they kept Kessel
Faulk_my_Dzingel, Barilko14, KennyBoi and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
20 mai 2021 à 15 h 43
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Boston fans, I'm begging you. Move on


Boston fans have moved on. I think most are happy with the performance of the team. It’s dopes like this that wake up and think, “you know what? I bet no one has ever thought to do an ACGM about how the bruins drafted poorly in 2015.” The lack of originality is astounding. But this one is particularly lame. It’s like the dud doesn’t get that without a kessel trade, the bruins don’t have seguin or hamilton, and without a hamilton trade, they don’t have some of those draft picks.

I’m pretty happy with the direction of the bruins team, and I think most fans are as well.
20 mai 2021 à 15 h 51
#4
Smythe.over.Hart
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,032
Mentions "j'aime": 2,348
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Boston fans have moved on. I think most are happy with the performance of the team. It’s dopes like this that wake up and think, “you know what? I bet no one has ever thought to do an ACGM about how the bruins drafted poorly in 2015.” The lack of originality is astounding. But this one is particularly lame. It’s like the dud doesn’t get that without a kessel trade, the bruins don’t have seguin or hamilton, and without a hamilton trade, they don’t have some of those draft picks.

I’m pretty happy with the direction of the bruins team, and I think most fans are as well.


I can think of at least 20 franchises that would like to have the success the Bruins have had over the past 12 years.
KennyBoi a aimé ceci.
20 mai 2021 à 15 h 52
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: faulkmydzingel
I can think of at least 20 franchises that would like to have the success the Bruins have had over the past 12 years.


Other than chicago, LA, Tampa, and Pittsburgh it’s basically just been a bunch of one off teams that got hot for a year. Maybe the caps go in that category too. Sustained success is kinda nice.
20 mai 2021 à 15 h 56
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,723
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Boston fans, I'm begging you. Move on


Trust me most bruins fans i know have moved on. We all hate when ppl do these bc they're literally negative iq takes.
bhavikp27 a aimé ceci.
20 mai 2021 à 16 h 14
#7
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 976
1. Every team has bad draft picks
2. Connor isn't better than DeBrusk
3. Smith and Kessel aren't actually good
4. Seguin is kinda overrated

But the Thornton trade and reasoning was utter garbage. And even if I don't rate Seguin the highest, the reasoning was really dumb there too, same sort of goes for Smith.
The Hamilton trade was terrible and the reasoning behind it even worse. He's probably the best defenseman in the league, if anything beaten by Fox. I think I'd have him just ahead of McAvoy.
I would have loved to have Chabot and Barzal on the Bruins obviously.
20 mai 2021 à 16 h 15
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,565
Mentions "j'aime": 5,450
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Boston fans, I'm begging you. Move on


At least 3/4 if not 80-90% of these ACGMs are from non-Bruins fans and most Bruins fans have moved on.
20 mai 2021 à 16 h 32
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: MelonVK
1. Every team has bad draft picks
2. Connor isn't better than DeBrusk
3. Smith and Kessel aren't actually good
4. Seguin is kinda overrated

But the Thornton trade and reasoning was utter garbage. And even if I don't rate Seguin the highest, the reasoning was really dumb there too, same sort of goes for Smith.
The Hamilton trade was terrible and the reasoning behind it even worse. He's probably the best defenseman in the league, if anything beaten by Fox. I think I'd have him just ahead of McAvoy.
I would have loved to have Chabot and Barzal on the Bruins obviously.


Connor is better than Debrusk.
20 mai 2021 à 17 h 1
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 282
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Still mad about the fact we traded a pick that became Kaprizov, but for Boston, they really messed everything in the 2015 draft up except for Debrusk. Even with Debrusk, we could have chosen better players. But what can you do?
20 mai 2021 à 17 h 2
#11
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 976
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
Connor is better than Debrusk.


bUt COnnOr HAs hIGhEr pOiNT tOTalS

He's not. He's a better shot, and better on the power play, but he's terrible defensively and doesn't really do better than your average player offensively. DeBrusk does. It's more about situation and minutes than anything else between those two.
20 mai 2021 à 17 h 8
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 1,247
Mentions "j'aime": 727
Do this revisionist history for every team.
20 mai 2021 à 17 h 44
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: MelonVK
bUt COnnOr HAs hIGhEr pOiNT tOTalS

He's not. He's a better shot, and better on the power play, but he's terrible defensively and doesn't really do better than your average player offensively. DeBrusk does. It's more about situation and minutes than anything else between those two.


And what does Debrusk do better on offensive better than the average player?
20 mai 2021 à 17 h 49
#14
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 976
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
And what does Debrusk do better on offensive better than the average player?


He creates more shots for himself and his teammates while he's on the ice
20 mai 2021 à 18 h 20
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,441
Mentions "j'aime": 930
Quoting: MelonVK
He creates more shots for himself and his teammates while he's on the ice


dude connor is absolutely better than debrusk. what are you on
20 mai 2021 à 19 h 3
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Boston fans, I'm begging you. Move on


I cant imagine its Boston fans that keep making these... most of us dont want to revisit this and have definitely moved on.
20 mai 2021 à 19 h 16
#17
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 976
Quoting: shmoeman
dude connor is absolutely better than debrusk. what are you on


He gets outshot consistently on the Wpg top or second line, while DeBrusk does the opposite on the Bruins second or third line. It isn't really close unless you look at points to draw all your conclusions
20 mai 2021 à 19 h 56
#18
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: MelonVK
He creates more shots for himself and his teammates while he's on the ice


Yup. Deff creates more shots for himself alright. Debrusk has 0 30+ goal years. Connor has 3. Debrusk has never scored 50 points in a season. Connor did it 4 times.
21 mai 2021 à 0 h 55
#19
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 976
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
Yup. Deff creates more shots for himself alright. Debrusk has 0 30+ goal years. Connor has 3. Debrusk has never scored 50 points in a season. Connor did it 4 times.


Yeah. Stick DeBrusk up for 20 minutes a night with Bergeron and Marchand and see whathappens. Also, I don't care if you score more goals even in a similar situation if you make sure to give up more shots the other way - which Connor does. Or do we not care about defense now?
21 mai 2021 à 4 h 37
#20
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: MelonVK
Yeah. Stick DeBrusk up for 20 minutes a night with Bergeron and Marchand and see whathappens. Also, I don't care if you score more goals even in a similar situation if you make sure to give up more shots the other way - which Connor does. Or do we not care about defense now?

You think every player focuses more on defense than offense? Ever hear of a player named Alexander ovechkin?
21 mai 2021 à 4 h 38
#21
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 976
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
You think every player focuses more on defense than offense? Ever hear of a player named Alexander ovechkin?


Yeah - Ovechkin would be better if he was better at playing defense. It's really not that hard.

But I can already tell you determine who's a good player first, and what goes into being a good player secondly, so this discussion is pointless
21 mai 2021 à 6 h 9
#22
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: MelonVK
Yeah - Ovechkin would be better if he was better at playing defense. It's really not that hard.

But I can already tell you determine who's a good player first, and what goes into being a good player secondly, so this discussion is pointless

You’re only focusing on defense because debrusk had like 14 points this year lmao
21 mai 2021 à 7 h 52
#23
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 976
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
You’re only focusing on defense because debrusk had like 14 points this year lmao


No, DeBrusk is offensively stronger as well - again, it's about situation. But I always care about defense. To elude to your previous example - I don't think Ovechkin is one of the best players in the league like many others do.

And some players are good defensively but still bad - like Carlo. He is pretty good defensively, but he's so bad offensively that he shouldn't be playing meaningful minutes outside of a shutdown 3rd pairing, d-zone start type of role.
21 mai 2021 à 11 h 45
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,441
Mentions "j'aime": 930
Quoting: MelonVK
No, DeBrusk is offensively stronger as well - again, it's about situation. But I always care about defense. To elude to your previous example - I don't think Ovechkin is one of the best players in the league like many others do.

And some players are good defensively but still bad - like Carlo. He is pretty good defensively, but he's so bad offensively that he shouldn't be playing meaningful minutes outside of a shutdown 3rd pairing, d-zone start type of role.


Debrusk is not good defensively and hes weak on the boards/puck. Ive always liked Debrusk but i take Connor over him 95% of the time.

also completely disagree with your Carlo take
21 mai 2021 à 13 h 7
#25
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 976
Quoting: shmoeman
Debrusk is not good defensively and hes weak on the boards/puck. Ive always liked Debrusk but i take Connor over him 95% of the time.

also completely disagree with your Carlo take


DeBrusk is slightly below average defensively- a lot of what he doesn't do in puck battles he does by moving the puck from d-zone to o-zone or skating a passer out of trouble.

Connor is wayyy below average. Like, terrible att playing defense. Shots fly his teams direction when he's out there, even if you control for everything.

DeBrusk makes more offense than expected from his situation. The opposite is true for Connor.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage