SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Playoff built

Créé par: RangerWall92
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 18 mai 2021
Publié: 18 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
54 250 000 $
11 250 000 $
1750 000 $
11 000 000 $
43 750 000 $
33 875 000 $
32 850 000 $
1900 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de WSH
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $76 507 417 $0 $0 $4 992 583 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 mai 2021 à 21 h 42
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,212
Mentions "j'aime": 10,557
They just got Mantha they most likely aren't trading him
18 mai 2021 à 21 h 44
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,545
Mentions "j'aime": 7,343
if you think Nylander is soft, well Mantha is downy soft
18 mai 2021 à 21 h 44
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,678
Mentions "j'aime": 5,203
Not that the trade is crazy off in value or anything, but there's no way the Caps do that after just acquiring Mantha for an absurd price.
palhal a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2021 à 21 h 48
#4
TOR V5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,366
Mentions "j'aime": 1,904
I think it is an issue we need to address, but i dont see this happening. It would be nice to see Mantha and Hathaway on the leafs tho
18 mai 2021 à 22 h 1
#5
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,474
Mentions "j'aime": 6,450
That Oleksiak-Bogosian pairing would be a nightmare to endure, and not for the opposition. Oleksiak's only upside is that he's 7 feet tall. Bogosian is all but washed. A Dermott-Hakanpaa pairing would both be much more cost-effective and on-ice productive.

Edmonton declines the Reilly trade. Great player, not what they need. Nor do I think this is the kind of return that I think Dubas would find acceptable. The picks - and resultant players they become - are too far out to help the Leafs win now. If the plan is to go all-in on Sandin (which I think is a mistake) then the goal of the Leafs management is to bring in equal value in the form of players or NHL-ready prospects. Stuff that helps the Leafs win today and tomorrow, not just tomorrow. I do still think that a defence with a left side that features all of Reilly, Muzzin, Sandin, and has Dermott waiting in the wings is far better than what you have here or anything post-Reilly trade. I don't necessarily think he needs to be brought back but unless you're getting that equivalent, NHL-ready value, he's better off as an internal rental.

If Dubas is dead-set on trading the guy, look to the Flyers. Some package built around Hagg, Patrick, and another roster player or prospect gives the Leafs those minor, complimentary pieces to address holes with on the roster, sustain their winning through longer team-controlled contracts, and frees up some form of cap space or at least balances its utilization, all while the other club in question draws genuine value out of the deal.
palhal et henryp a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2021 à 22 h 29
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,678
Mentions "j'aime": 5,203
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
That Oleksiak-Bogosian pairing would be a nightmare to endure, and not for the opposition. Oleksiak's only upside is that he's 7 feet tall. Bogosian is all but washed. A Dermott-Hakanpaa pairing would both be much more cost-effective and on-ice productive.

Edmonton declines the Reilly trade. Great player, not what they need. Nor do I think this is the kind of return that I think Dubas would find acceptable. The picks - and resultant players they become - are too far out to help the Leafs win now. If the plan is to go all-in on Sandin (which I think is a mistake) then the goal of the Leafs management is to bring in equal value in the form of players or NHL-ready prospects. Stuff that helps the Leafs win today and tomorrow, not just tomorrow. I do still think that a defence with a left side that features all of Reilly, Muzzin, Sandin, and has Dermott waiting in the wings is far better than what you have here or anything post-Reilly trade. I don't necessarily think he needs to be brought back but unless you're getting that equivalent, NHL-ready value, he's better off as an internal rental.

If Dubas is dead-set on trading the guy, look to the Flyers. Some package built around Hagg, Patrick, and another roster player or prospect gives the Leafs those minor, complimentary pieces to address holes with on the roster, sustain their winning through longer team-controlled contracts, and frees up some form of cap space or at least balances its utilization, all while the other club in question draws genuine value out of the deal.


Bogosian washed? Shows what you know:

EkAnFHqWAAAAHvQ.png
18 mai 2021 à 22 h 38
#7
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,474
Mentions "j'aime": 6,450
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
Bogosian washed? Shows what you know:

EkAnFHqWAAAAHvQ.png


At under 13 minutes per game 5v5 and a bias towards offensive zone starts, I don't find any of that to be particularly surprising. Perhaps better than anticipated, but to tell me that Toronto doesn't have the best set of forwards in the North division would be folly. His relative rates suggest he's middle of the pack in terms of Toronto's defenders and that he's been a very good value add for this season, but I have concerns regarding his age, injury history, and how this season was his least-productive season that wasn't prematurely ended due to injury.

I think he makes a better #7 than he does a full-time roster player, especially if it means further delaying Liljegren from meaningful minutes.
henryp a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2021 à 22 h 41
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,678
Mentions "j'aime": 5,203
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
At under 13 minutes per game 5v5 and a bias towards offensive zone starts, I don't find any of that to be particularly surprising. Perhaps better than anticipated, but to tell me that Toronto doesn't have the best set of forwards in the North division would be folly. His relative rates suggest he's middle of the pack in terms of Toronto's defenders and that he's been a very good value add for this season, but I have concerns regarding his age, injury history, and how this season was his least-productive season that wasn't prematurely ended due to injury.

I think he makes a better #7 than he does a full-time roster player, especially if it means further delaying Liljegren from meaningful minutes.


.........It was a joke. The chart is fake.
18 mai 2021 à 22 h 42
#9
Démarrer sujet
RangerWall92
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 3,385
Mentions "j'aime": 989
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
.........It was a joke. The chart is fake.


I mean, it would seem realistic for someone of Bogo's caliber
LeafsFanForSomeReason a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2021 à 22 h 47
#10
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,474
Mentions "j'aime": 6,450
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
.........It was a joke. The chart is fake.


Quoting: RangerWall92
I mean, it would seem realistic for someone of Bogo's caliber


Shockingly a lot of Bogosian's numbers are very much in the positive, which is why I couldn't tell it was fake.

CF%: 52.75
SF%: 52.73
GF%: 56.52
xGF%: 55.56
SCF%: 56.10
HDCF%: 57.75
HDGF%: 72.00

I'm still not well-versed on RAPM charts.
18 mai 2021 à 22 h 55
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,678
Mentions "j'aime": 5,203
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
Shockingly a lot of Bogosian's numbers are very much in the positive, which is why I couldn't tell it was fake.

CF%: 52.75
SF%: 52.73
GF%: 56.52
xGF%: 55.56
SCF%: 56.10
HDCF%: 57.75
HDGF%: 72.00

I'm still not well-versed on RAPM charts.


Me neither lol; blue good, red bad.

It's really not that shocking, though. He's had a good year with the Leafs. Exceeded my expectations based on preconceived notions. While I was making light of it with my earlier comment, I did/do disagree with that statement.
BeterChiarelli a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2021 à 23 h 16
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 240
Mentions "j'aime": 33
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
At under 13 minutes per game 5v5 and a bias towards offensive zone starts, I don't find any of that to be particularly surprising. Perhaps better than anticipated, but to tell me that Toronto doesn't have the best set of forwards in the North division would be folly. His relative rates suggest he's middle of the pack in terms of Toronto's defenders and that he's been a very good value add for this season, but I have concerns regarding his age, injury history, and how this season was his least-productive season that wasn't prematurely ended due to injury.

I think he makes a better #7 than he does a full-time roster player, especially if it means further delaying Liljegren from meaningful minutes.



I think your understanding of hockey knowledge is great. I also love how respectful you are about giving your input as well. thank you.
BeterChiarelli et Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage