SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Granato

Créé par: Shibbal18
Équipe: 2021-22 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 11 mai 2021
Publié: 12 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Risto and Miller gone at/before the deadline
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3800 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 050 000 $
21 050 000 $
88 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
31 500 000 $
2874 125 $
31 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
43 500 000 $
21 400 000 $
22 000 000 $
23 200 000 $
31 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Perreault, Jacob
  2. Steel, Sam [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Reinhart, Sam [Droits de RFA]
2.
3.
BUF
SEA
    Ullmark, Linus
    Rachats de contrats
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de COL
    Logo de BUF
    2022
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    2023
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $66 810 583 $113 916 $1 062 500 $14 689 417 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    3 050 000 $3 050 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    925 000 $925 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    C, AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 2
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C, AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    889 166 $889 166 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    12 mai 2021 à 0 h 45
    #1
    Rangers 2023
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 19,043
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
    Steel not in the lineup?
    Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
    12 mai 2021 à 1 h 11
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Shibbal18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 25,192
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,012
    Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
    Steel not in the lineup?


    RFA rights, knew i forgot something
    12 mai 2021 à 1 h 57
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 3,653
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,621
    Sorry. No way kings pay that much
    12 mai 2021 à 2 h 22
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Shibbal18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 25,192
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,012
    Quoting: KINGS67
    Sorry. No way kings pay that much


    Thats the standard with Quick as a cap dump
    12 mai 2021 à 3 h 36
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 3,653
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,621
    Quoting: Shibbal18
    Thats the standard with Quick as a cap dump


    Quick isn’t a cap dump. Kings have plenty of cap space
    12 mai 2021 à 5 h 11
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 941
    Mentions "j'aime": 606
    Eichel trade looks about right. Both sides are likely happy with it (Kings keep Byfield and get rid of Quick which is a big win in any Eichel deal).

    I doubt Anaheim gives up Steel for Reinhart. Maybe so it's not crazy...but I suspect no.
    Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
    12 mai 2021 à 7 h 11
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2019
    Messages: 1,115
    Mentions "j'aime": 623
    Quoting: KINGS67
    Sorry. No way kings pay that much


    That much?

    A prospect
    2 B prospects
    Cap Dump
    Mid 1st

    That's too much?
    Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
    12 mai 2021 à 7 h 26
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 3,653
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,621
    Quoting: LindyRuffRider
    That much?

    A prospect
    2 B prospects
    Cap Dump
    Mid 1st

    That's too much?

    Lol 2 B prospects

    Again. Quick isn’t a cap dump
    12 mai 2021 à 7 h 33
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2019
    Messages: 1,115
    Mentions "j'aime": 623
    Quoting: KINGS67
    Lol 2 B prospects

    Again. Quick isn’t a cap dump


    You are drastically overrating Kupari & Fmo. An A prospect is someone like Byfield or Drysdale. Those two are a tier below them.

    Quick is a 35 year old below average backup goalie making 5.8 million. He has negative value. So yes, he's a cap dump.
    Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
    12 mai 2021 à 8 h 15
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 3,653
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,621
    Quoting: LindyRuffRider
    You are drastically overrating Kupari & Fmo. An A prospect is someone like Byfield or Drysdale. Those two are a tier below them.

    Quick is a 35 year old below average backup goalie making 5.8 million. He has negative value. So yes, he's a cap dump.

    K
    12 mai 2021 à 8 h 38
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2019
    Messages: 1,115
    Mentions "j'aime": 623
    Quoting: KINGS67
    K


    You think Kupari is on the same level as Byfield or Drysdale? You think a 5.8 million backup goalie isn't a cap dump?
    Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
    12 mai 2021 à 8 h 49
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    Shibbal18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 25,192
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,012
    Quoting: KINGS67
    Lol 2 B prospects

    Again. Quick isn’t a cap dump


    Quick is toast, his numbers would have been fine in the late 80s
    12 mai 2021 à 8 h 50
    #13
    Démarrer sujet
    Shibbal18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 25,192
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,012
    Quoting: GoodIdeaAtTheTime
    Eichel trade looks about right. Both sides are likely happy with it (Kings keep Byfield and get rid of Quick which is a big win in any Eichel deal).

    I doubt Anaheim gives up Steel for Reinhart. Maybe so it's not crazy...but I suspect no.


    Steel has flamed out as a top 6 star forward he was supposed to be, hes a reclamation project. With Reinhart back at center now too, I dont see why Anaheim would be so attached
    GoodIdeaAtTheTime a aimé ceci.
    12 mai 2021 à 10 h 4
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 941
    Mentions "j'aime": 606
    Quoting: Shibbal18
    Steel has flamed out as a top 6 star forward he was supposed to be, hes a reclamation project. With Reinhart back at center now too, I dont see why Anaheim would be so attached


    Ok, sign me up then. Thanks for the info!
    12 mai 2021 à 10 h 45
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 3,653
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,621
    Quoting: LindyRuffRider
    You think Kupari is on the same level as Byfield or Drysdale? You think a 5.8 million backup goalie isn't a cap dump?


    Not at all I’m looking at the bigger picture in the fact that calling those prospects B in the kings prospect pool should be taken lightly. I’ll give you ****emo but Kupari would be an A prospect in 90% of the other teams pools
    12 mai 2021 à 10 h 46
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 3,653
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,621
    Quoting: Shibbal18
    Quick is toast, his numbers would have been fine in the late 80s

    He’s not a cap dump. Cap dumps are for teams in need of space.
    12 mai 2021 à 11 h 6
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2019
    Messages: 1,115
    Mentions "j'aime": 623
    Quoting: KINGS67
    Not at all I’m looking at the bigger picture in the fact that calling those prospects B in the kings prospect pool should be taken lightly. I’ll give you ****emo but Kupari would be an A prospect in 90% of the other teams pools


    Him being a B prospect has nothing to do with which team has his rights, but how he's developed & produced thus far. Kupari had a .3 PPG in the AHL at 19/20 and a .7PPG in the AHL at 20/21. That's not an A prospect. He's similar to someone like Asplund, who obviously isn't an A prospect either.

    Someone that's an A prospect is a guy like Byfield or Lundell, who's development projects them to be a top player. There's nothing showing that Kupari will be a top player.
    12 mai 2021 à 11 h 28
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 3,653
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,621
    Modifié 12 mai 2021 à 11 h 36
    Quoting: LindyRuffRider
    Him being a B prospect has nothing to do with which team has his rights, but how he's developed & produced thus far. Kupari had a .3 PPG in the AHL at 19/20 and a .7PPG in the AHL at 20/21. That's not an A prospect. He's similar to someone like Asplund, who obviously isn't an A prospect either.

    Someone that's an A prospect is a guy like Byfield or Lundell, who's development projects them to be a top player. There's nothing showing that Kupari will be a top player.

    I think kings should stay the course. Eichel is very good but sacrificing the future could hurt LA
    12 mai 2021 à 12 h 12
    #19
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2019
    Messages: 1,115
    Mentions "j'aime": 623
    Quoting: KINGS67
    I think kings should stay the course. Eichel is very good but sacrificing the future could hurt LA


    You're giving up 3 prospects lol. Sacrificing the future is a huge exaggeration.
    Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage