SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

I hate my favorite team

Créé par: Cory0923
Équipe: 2021-22 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 11 mai 2021
Publié: 11 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
#SuckHardForBedard I guess since this team is incapable of complex thought
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
1900 000 $
24 500 000 $
21 750 000 $
21 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 750 000 $
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Boldy, Matthew
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
MIN
  1. Reinhart, Sam [Droits de RFA]
2.
BUF
  1. Byfield, Quinton
  2. Madden, Tyler
  3. Markkanen, Juho [Liste de réserve]
  4. Vilardi, Gabriel
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
3.
BUF
  1. Bemström, Emil
  2. Korpisalo, Joonas
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
4.
BUF
    Do they take Skinner in expansion draft for this?
    SEA
    1. Bemström, Emil
    2. Skinner, Jeff
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
    4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
    5.
    BUF
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de COL
    Logo de BUF
    2022
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    2023
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2081 500 000 $35 719 750 $113 916 $5 032 500 $45 780 250 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    925 000 $925 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
    AG, C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    925 000 $925 000 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    889 166 $889 166 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    900 000 $900 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    11 mai 2021 à 12 h 35
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2019
    Messages: 1,115
    Mentions "j'aime": 623
    I really doubt LA would include Byfield. Would be Turcotte instead.
    Capitalfail67 et PuckLuck_77 a aimé ceci.
    11 mai 2021 à 12 h 40
    #2
    Caps fan idk why
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2016
    Messages: 11,263
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,353
    Quoting: LindyRuffRider
    I really doubt LA would include Byfield. Would be Turcotte instead.


    i would assume Byfield is untouchable ATM
    PuckLuck_77 a aimé ceci.
    11 mai 2021 à 12 h 46
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2017
    Messages: 8,223
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,214
    Unless skinner wants to go to seattle, he wont be exposed, whether its enough or not. Somehow that terrible contract is made just a bit worse by skinner having the ability to refuse any trade, and he apparently wants to be close to toronto.
    11 mai 2021 à 13 h 7
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 2,325
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,222
    Quoting: LindyRuffRider
    I really doubt LA would include Byfield. Would be Turcotte instead.


    Quoting: Capitalfail67
    i would assume Byfield is untouchable ATM


    You're both correct. And not just that. There's no trade that LA makes that includes ANY two of QB/Vilardi/Turcotte. It's one (Vilardi or Turcotte), and then added pieces from there. Otherwise Eichel's not going to LA.

    Which probably means Eichel's not going to LA.
    RazWild a aimé ceci.
    11 mai 2021 à 13 h 10
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 4,414
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    I'd rather have Boldy.

    Only way Boldy leaves is if it's as part of a Eichel trade.
    11 mai 2021 à 13 h 16
    #6
    Rangers 2023
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 19,043
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
    How about #DieHardForBedard?
    Cory0923 a aimé ceci.
    11 mai 2021 à 13 h 17
    #7
    Rangers 2023
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 19,043
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
    Quoting: RazWild
    I'd rather have Boldy.

    Only way Boldy leaves is if it's as part of a Eichel trade.


    Hes great but isn't he supposed to be a LW at the NHL level
    11 mai 2021 à 13 h 28
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 3,756
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,217
    Well we don’t exactly need the trade however I’d take it as the jackets. We get a shooting left wing and a right shot defenseman.
    11 mai 2021 à 13 h 29
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 4,414
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
    Hes great but isn't he supposed to be a LW at the NHL level


    Yes, but he's a pretty similar player to Reinhart in that regard. Reinhart can play center but doesn't like to and prefers to play on the wing himself. He was only playing the position now out of necessity for this season.

    Boldy to me is just as good of a talent if not slightly better than Reinhart. He's certainly the more well rounded and complete player that's for sure. IMO, Boldy has the higher ceiling between the two.
    11 mai 2021 à 13 h 32
    #10
    Rangers 2023
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 19,043
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
    Quoting: RazWild
    Yes, but he's a pretty similar player to Reinhart in that regard. Reinhart can play center but doesn't like to and prefers to play on the wing himself. He was only playing the position now out of necessity for this season.

    Boldy to me is just as good of a talent if not slightly better than Reinhart. He's certainly the more well rounded and complete player that's for sure. IMO, Boldy has the higher ceiling between the two.


    Agreed, but I doubt hes someone buffalo would covet in a package for Eichel
    11 mai 2021 à 14 h 20
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 4,414
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    Modifié 11 mai 2021 à 14 h 30
    Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
    Agreed, but I doubt hes someone buffalo would covet in a package for Eichel


    Possibly, but I'm not so sure about that. But it does explain why I'd rather hold onto Boldy over acquiring Reinhart.

    This argument that Boldy wouldn't hold interest in Buffalo is just odd to me, they would require a top prospect back in return in any Eichel trade. That means either Rossi or Boldy.

    Boldy makes more sense for Buffalo over Rossi for 3 reasons, or at least it should.

    1) Rossi's issues with Covid have cratered any value he otherwise would of had right now. Boldy has significantly higher value between the two, at least until Rossi is back on the ice and any and all concerns about his health are laid to rest.

    2) Fit, for better or worse the Sabres realistically don't need a Rossi, as they already have Cozens for their future 2C needs. And will be in the running for one of Wright, Lambert, Savoie in 2022 or Bedard, Michkov in 2023 to replace Eichel in short order.

    Both Rossi and Cozens are centers, it's where they deserve to play. But they also are top six talent as well, they both need to play there in order to get the most out of them. But if both are on roster, one of them is going to wind up on the wing which would be a waste of said center talents.

    That is a less than ideal fit.

    Boldy however does, as he doesn't affect anything other than as a added cog in the forward core for that future top six.

    3) And this is more or less an extension of #2. I always like to include Khovanov as part of any trade scenario as the two of them together are a more appealing return than say just Rossi. Khovanov may only be a B prospect, but he's got top six potential either at center or at wing. So that would fulfill the center prospect back with top-six potential card of any potential Eichel trade.

    The way I look at it, is this. Sabers should take either a defenseman this year or Kent Johnson, get a package that includes a return like Boldy and Khovanov plus other pieces, draft one of the big three in 2022 or big two in 2023. That goes a long way to shortening any potential rebuild.

    People get so caught up with the idea of getting max value for a player or getting the other teams top prospect that they don't consider that prospect's overall fit in their own organization and think ahead and in so doing arbitrarily dismiss a slightly lesser prospect but who is the right talent and fit that a organization actually needs.

    Edit: That got rather long, apologies.
    11 mai 2021 à 14 h 20
    #12
    mostly harmless
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2016
    Messages: 6,593
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,090
    Quoting: The_Cannon
    Well we don’t exactly need the trade however I’d take it as the jackets. We get a shooting left wing and a right shot defenseman.

    Honestly, I think I'd rather have Bemstrom than Olofsson, myself. (Olofsson, IIRC, plays RW.)
    11 mai 2021 à 14 h 28
    #13
    Rangers 2023
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 19,043
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
    Quoting: Viqsi
    Honestly, I think I'd rather have Bemstrom than Olofsson, myself. (Olofsson, IIRC, plays RW.)


    He plays both
    11 mai 2021 à 14 h 54
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 3,756
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,217
    Quoting: Viqsi
    Honestly, I think I'd rather have Bemstrom than Olofsson, myself. (Olofsson, IIRC, plays RW.)


    Even if he does play both, I’d flip him for a pick or play him on his off wing and have him unload from the left side.
    12 mai 2021 à 13 h 29
    #15
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 120
    Mentions "j'aime": 23
    Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
    How about #DieHardForBedard?


    It would work if I wasn't already dead inside
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage