SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

is it possible to get eichel without kk or laf

Créé par: BreadMan10972
Équipe: 2020-21 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 10 mai 2021
Publié: 10 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
What is a reasonable return
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
Transactions
BUF
  1. Kravtsov, Vitali
  2. Lundkvist, Nils
  3. Strome, Ryan
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (NYR)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
strome or chytil
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de NYR
Logo de LAK
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2023
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $79 553 966 $0 $10 362 500 $1 946 034 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
DG/DD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
825 000 $825 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
833 333 $833 333 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
737 500 $737 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $ (75 000 $$75K75 000 $$75K)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 mai 2021 à 19 h 45
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,014
Mentions "j'aime": 422
I think your proposal is close
10 mai 2021 à 19 h 47
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
I don’t think so
sabres89 a aimé ceci.
10 mai 2021 à 19 h 49
#3
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,507
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
No, because the Kings have too many assets who are centers.
10 mai 2021 à 19 h 50
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
anything is possible but its highly unlikely
10 mai 2021 à 19 h 53
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Depends if they love those prospects. They probably don’t. So probably no.
sabres89 et Ramus_Dahlin44 a aimé ceci.
10 mai 2021 à 19 h 53
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 133
Mentions "j'aime": 50
Only player I think the Sabres would be interested in this trade would be Nils Lundkvist.

2 first rounds picks are pretty weak when he consider the 2021 draft is weak, also the 2022 first is likely to be a late round pick next year.

By trading Eichel it would mean another rebuild so Ryan strome wouldn't fit, also Kravtsov has 4 points in 20 games.
sabres89 a aimé ceci.
10 mai 2021 à 20 h 0
#7
Tspky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 3,885
Mentions "j'aime": 980
The package is very close. Honestly ppl are sleeping on how good Nils is, and kravtsov had his first cup of coffee in the nhl and looks good (can’t wait till he gets actual PP time). If Buffalo wants more of a known player I would sub buch for kravtsov and lower one of the firsts
10 mai 2021 à 20 h 1
#8
Speak of the Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,935
Mentions "j'aime": 26,436
Probably not. A team could outbid the Rangers
GoodIdeaAtTheTime a aimé ceci.
10 mai 2021 à 20 h 5
#9
Bandwagon fairweathe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,606
Mentions "j'aime": 3,254
I don’t think eichel is the right answer in ny, 10 million hit is going to mess with the budget going forward with a shestrrkin, fox and some of the kids contracts coming. Bargain hunt the 2c got to be able to find somebody playing over there contract over a 10 million dollar player plus assets, Rangers team will draw major ufa interest with that base coming also
10 mai 2021 à 20 h 20
#10
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 977
Quoting: Ramus_Dahlin44
Kravtsov has 4 points in 20 games.


I don't know if everyone on this board has alzheimers disease, but Eichels first season was garbage. His 2nd season too. It was in 18/19 he started outshooting his opponents, relatively. Last year I'd consider him a top player, and from what we saw this year he's *finally* one of the best players in the league.

This idea that every prospect has to be great from the start is super weird and not how we know most good players - unless you're literally only looking at point production. Most rookies get somewhat outshot. Jack Hughes had a garbage d+1 season but is already looking like one of the better players in the league. It can turn around quickly. If you're down on prospects that have looked really good up until the NHL level because of a poor showing in a small sample size, you'll be doing a lot of player evaluation revision later.
GoodIdeaAtTheTime a aimé ceci.
10 mai 2021 à 20 h 27
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,118
Mentions "j'aime": 18,340
Quoting: MelonVK
I don't know if everyone on this board has alzheimers disease, but Eichels first season was garbage. His 2nd season too. It was in 18/19 he started outshooting his opponents, relatively. Last year I'd consider him a top player, and from what we saw this year he's *finally* one of the best players in the league.

This idea that every prospect has to be great from the start is super weird and not how we know most good players - unless you're literally only looking at point production. Most rookies get somewhat outshot. Jack Hughes had a garbage d+1 season but is already looking like one of the better players in the league. It can turn around quickly. If you're down on prospects that have looked really good up until the NHL level because of a poor showing in a small sample size, you'll be doing a lot of player evaluation revision later.


Ditto this.
With young players, you can probably get as much information by TOI/gp than you can with pts/gp.
10 mai 2021 à 21 h 5
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 941
Mentions "j'aime": 606
Quoting: MelonVK
I don't know if everyone on this board has alzheimers disease, but Eichels first season was garbage. His 2nd season too. It was in 18/19 he started outshooting his opponents, relatively. Last year I'd consider him a top player, and from what we saw this year he's *finally* one of the best players in the league.

This idea that every prospect has to be great from the start is super weird and not how we know most good players - unless you're literally only looking at point production. Most rookies get somewhat outshot. Jack Hughes had a garbage d+1 season but is already looking like one of the better players in the league. It can turn around quickly. If you're down on prospects that have looked really good up until the NHL level because of a poor showing in a small sample size, you'll be doing a lot of player evaluation revision later.


Talking too much sense. This is the internet.
10 mai 2021 à 22 h 2
#13
2285 Stanley Cup Cha
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,397
Mentions "j'aime": 528
Maybe but it sure as hell isn't possible without chytil
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage