SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Offseason Guide Burns to SEA BuyOut Jones Sign Granlund Larsson Freddie Armia

Créé par: CheechYou
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 10 mai 2021
Publié: 10 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
My guide to SJ's offseason:

1. Ship Burns to Seattle:
Leonard + two 2nds gets it done. Burns is logging 26:11 of ice time this season -- that's absolutely nuts -- and he's still pretty effective. Check out his advanced stats -- he still drives offense very well 5v5 and is average defensively (which is a good thing, neither good or bad), while still QBing the PP and playing 1st unit PK. The point totals have dropped, sure, but that's in part due to a bad SJ team this season and part due to focusing more on being decent defensively. The contract is large with 4 more years at 8mil, but this is one of those contracts that can make sense for SEA with a decent sweetener thrown in with Leonard and two 2nds for trade ammunition/building the farm team through the draft. Burns is also very marketable and would be an instant fan favorite.

2. Ship Simek for a mid-to-late round pick:
Simmer's a good 2nd/3rd pairing dman, but Sharks are too loaded on the left side. Simek's the odd man out and shipping him to a team in need of defense/physicality won't be difficult to one of the younger teams with cap space like NJ, even if the contract that is 1 year too many with 3 yrs left instead of 2 drives the price down to just a mid-to-late round pick to get it done.

3. Buy-out Jones:
It's time for a change of scenery for both Jonesey and the team. Won't say anything more about that.

4. Sign Granlund:
Offensive middle-6-C SJ desperately needs with offensive wingers like Balcers/Meier and Labanc/Blichfeld. a 5yrx4mil deal gets it done.

5. Sign Larsson (and Poolman):
Replace Burns in the top-4 and have a defensive-focused guy locked up for a few years there at a decent mid-range contract. If Larsson's not there, target Barrie for a similar deal, who can also add some offense (esp on SJ's atrocious PP) and have Ferraro cover more defensively on that pairing. Poolman fits perfect with Vlasic to provide a secondary shutdown line on a 1-yr deal. Merkley at this point clearly needs 1 more year in the AHL (slightly normal for defensemen to take longer to get ready) but should be ready to take his spot in the following season at league minimum or even halfway through next season if he shows major strides.

6. Sign Armia:
Physical defensive RW for the bottom-6 with enough speed and skill that fits the bill for just what the Sharks need. Forms a shut-down defensive 4th line with Nieto and Gambrell.

7. Sign Andersen to a 1-yr deal:
Freddie gets a 1-yr flyer in a prove-it bounce-back contract. After being paid 5mil for a good number of seasons, this is Freddie's chance to prove that he can still be a very good goaltender in this league. Reasonable to think he takes a 3.5mil contract especially with the defensive moves (Larsson/Armia) Sharks make before this, as well as a little Danish connection with Blichfeld + True. Look for Melnichuk (or Emond) to take over this spot with Korenar as the starter for next season.

Hertl+Ferraro+Kniazhev's extensions the following season:
Freddie + Poolman's contracts coming off the books results in 5mil of extra cap space. Fill those 2 spots with ELCs (Merkley + Melnichuk/Emond), that leaves ~3.2mil + 760K = almost 4mil, but -500K of extra buyout-Jones money, leaving ~3.45mil. I think Hertl gets a 1mil increase for 6.625mil, Ferraro takes a 2-yr bridge for 2mil (~a 1mil increase), and Kniazhev also bridges at a 1mil increase so those are all covered. Other factors like Ozzy or Robins being ready to take over Nieto or even Barabanov's spots (if the latter either commands too much money or regresses) could save the team money too.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
21 125 000 $
21 250 000 $
21 500 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 850 000 $
34 500 000 $
32 750 000 $
45 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
13 500 000 $
11 125 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
SEA
  1. Burns, Brent
  2. Leonard, John
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de CBJ
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $71 347 030 $0 $212 500 $10 152 970 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C
UFA - 1
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
776 667 $776 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance110 000 $$110K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 mai 2021 à 18 h 58
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 2,921
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Crazy how Larssons value shifted so much this season last offseason everyone **** on him for being terrible now most teams that need RD are targeting him. Apparently Oilers and Larsson are close on a 4 year deal so might not be available.
10 mai 2021 à 19 h 38
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,965
Mentions "j'aime": 601
No that's not getting Francis to take age 37-40 seasons of 8mil Burns
10 mai 2021 à 19 h 56
#3
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,684
Mentions "j'aime": 1,881
Thats insane to pay that much for Seattle to take Burns.
10 mai 2021 à 20 h 54
#4
Démarrer sujet
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,013
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: Bolts20Cup
No that's not getting Francis to take age 37-40 seasons of 8mil Burns

I suggest you consider coming out of the typical paradigm of how we think the typical player aged 37-40 is in the NHL, and consider that Burns and his freakish built and athleticism isn't like most players. Brady at 42 is still elite. Burns is logging an absolute -- ton -- of minutes and is still doing very well this season in terms of driving offense 5v5 and being pretty good defensively. Yeah, the point totals aren't there, but with a better team in SEA there's no reason they won't come up too. He's still a very, very good offensive player who's good defensively that can top-unit both PP and PK.

Quoting: Klara
Thats insane to pay that much for Seattle to take Burns.

Agreed. Anything less and they'll have my head on this site... I personally think Leonard + a 2022 2nd is what gets it done.
Klara a aimé ceci.
10 mai 2021 à 22 h 4
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,965
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: CheechYou
I suggest you consider coming out of the typical paradigm of how we think the typical player aged 37-40 is in the NHL, and consider that Burns and his freakish built and athleticism isn't like most players. Brady at 42 is still elite. Burns is logging an absolute -- ton -- of minutes and is still doing very well this season in terms of driving offense 5v5 and being pretty good defensively. Yeah, the point totals aren't there, but with a better team in SEA there's no reason they won't come up too. He's still a very, very good offensive player who's good defensively that can top-unit both PP and PK.


Agreed. Anything less and they'll have my head on this site... I personally think Leonard + a 2022 2nd is what gets it done.


Comparing anyone to Brady is ridiculous
10 mai 2021 à 22 h 13
#6
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,684
Mentions "j'aime": 1,881
Quoting: CheechYou
I suggest you consider coming out of the typical paradigm of how we think the typical player aged 37-40 is in the NHL, and consider that Burns and his freakish built and athleticism isn't like most players. Brady at 42 is still elite. Burns is logging an absolute -- ton -- of minutes and is still doing very well this season in terms of driving offense 5v5 and being pretty good defensively. Yeah, the point totals aren't there, but with a better team in SEA there's no reason they won't come up too. He's still a very, very good offensive player who's good defensively that can top-unit both PP and PK.


Agreed. Anything less and they'll have my head on this site... I personally think Leonard + a 2022 2nd is what gets it done.


I think they are being ridiculous, Burns would be the 1D and captain, he is the perfect fit for an expansion team, and really shouldn't take more than a 2nd (at most) for Seattle to agree.
CheechYou a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage