SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The New Blackhawks Attempt 2

Créé par: P1zzaPolarBear
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 10 mai 2021
Publié: 10 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
So I'm trying this again, the first Chicago Roster I did had some poor trades and questionable trade value, so I'm trying this again. This is for the 2021-2022 Season with a healthy Roster. These are trade I would make as GM. I tried to acquire better Defence-men and Goaltenders since we need that, as well support in offence and draft picks. I hope you all enjoy and I hope I did a better job this time around.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 800 000 $
21 200 000 $
2925 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 250 000 $
1925 000 $
13 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 300 000 $
2780 000 $
2800 000 $
2775 000 $
36 000 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1800 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Dunn, Vince3 250 000 $
Choix de 2e ronde en 2022
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (LAK)
LAK
  1. Zadorov, Nikita [Droits de RFA]
2.
OTT
  1. Connolly, Brett
  2. Subban, Malcolm
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
4.
CHI
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
5.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
6.
WPG
  1. Carpenter, Ryan
  2. De Haan, Calvin
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de VGK
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de LAK
Logo de CHI
Logo de FLA
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $69 403 509 $452 439 $4 532 500 $12 096 491 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
912 500 $912 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
853 333 $853 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
811 667 $811 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
UFA
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 mai 2021 à 13 h 9
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
I think St Louis matches that but I haven't been paying attention to Dunn's performance this season. No real reason to trade for Murray as he's been pretty bad this season, and I'd keep Stillman as he is young and has shown decent potential here. Could probably get a little more for Murphy but not from Buffalo unless they are REALLY scrambling to make Eichel happy
10 mai 2021 à 13 h 16
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 105
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Quoting: SlickWilly
I think St Louis matches that but I haven't been paying attention to Dunn's performance this season. No real reason to trade for Murray as he's been pretty bad this season, and I'd keep Stillman as he is young and has shown decent potential here. Could probably get a little more for Murphy but not from Buffalo unless they are REALLY scrambling to make Eichel happy


Yeah thats fair, probably could offer Dunn more, he's on pace for a good point total, Murray has shown to be a good player, and because he's playing poorly it would be easier to trade for less, I feel like he could bounce back with a better team. Stillman could be good, could have kept him but would rather give more time to Beaudin and Mitchell, and yeah maybe a bit more for Murphy but a second from Buffalo isn't terrible, but you do make some valid points.
SlickWilly a aimé ceci.
10 mai 2021 à 13 h 45
#3
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,315
Mentions "j'aime": 2,080
Modifié 10 mai 2021 à 13 h 58
Quoting: P1zzaPolarBear
Yeah thats fair, probably could offer Dunn more, he's on pace for a good point total, Murray has shown to be a good player, and because he's playing poorly it would be easier to trade for less, I feel like he could bounce back with a better team. Stillman could be good, could have kept him but would rather give more time to Beaudin and Mitchell, and yeah maybe a bit more for Murphy but a second from Buffalo isn't terrible, but you do make some valid points.


Murray is washed and Ottawa would have to pay to move him, Barrie isn't good his stats are inflated by Mcdavid. Buffalo isn't paying for another RHD so Murphy can get a late 1st and a mid teir prospect. Keith isn't a top pair D man anymone, and Zadorov can get a lot more.
10 mai 2021 à 13 h 53
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 105
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Quoting: Beetlejuice
Murray is washed and Ottawa would have to pay to move him, Barrie isn't good his stats are inflated by Mcdavid. Buffalo isn't paying for another RHD so Murphy can get a late 1st and a mid teir prospect. Keith isn't a top pair D man anymone, and Zadorov can get a lot more.


Now that I look back at this, I agree with some of your points. Barrie and Murray are players we might be better without, Buffalo probably might not do the trade, and yeah, Keith and Seabrook are getting older, Seabrook is pretty much done at this point, Keith is gonna follow soon, so he could play a smaller role, maybe letting Dunn or someone else play the time, and I feel like Zadorov might be good, but I still don't think he was worth the value in the Saad Trade, but I can agree he does have some value. Do you think the rest of the trades are justifiable though?
10 mai 2021 à 13 h 58
#5
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,315
Mentions "j'aime": 2,080
Quoting: P1zzaPolarBear
Now that I look back at this, I agree with some of your points. Barrie and Murray are players we might be better without, Buffalo probably might not do the trade, and yeah, Keith and Seabrook are getting older, Seabrook is pretty much done at this point, Keith is gonna follow soon, so he could play a smaller role, maybe letting Dunn or someone else play the time, and I feel like Zadorov might be good, but I still don't think he was worth the value in the Saad Trade, but I can agree he does have some value. Do you think the rest of the trades are justifiable though?


You know Seabrook retired months ago.
Also it's funny that Hagel has 1 less point than Suter, but is making almost 2 million dollars less than him, also considering Hagel can do a lot more than Suter can do.
10 mai 2021 à 14 h 6
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 105
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Quoting: Beetlejuice
You know Seabrook retired months ago.
Also it's funny that Hagel has 1 less point than Suter, but is making almost 2 million dollars less than him, also considering Hagel can do a lot more than Suter can do.


Shoot, I completely forgot about that, I thought it was just Shaw, also yeah I agree, Hagel needs way more pay.
10 mai 2021 à 19 h 44
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Sorry these trades have no resemblance on what CHI values in their players.
11 mai 2021 à 8 h 43
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,913
Mentions "j'aime": 562
Oilers decline
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage