SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

New look

Créé par: Capitalfail67
Équipe: 2021-22 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 9 mai 2021
Publié: 9 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Let Alexeyev and Fehevary split time till they seem ready to be full time.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
54 000 000 $
22 500 000 $
22 500 000 $
2850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
410 000 000 $
45 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
WSH
  1. Dunn, Vince [Droits de RFA]
STL
  1. Eller, Lars
Détails additionnels:
Thomas becomes 2c
Eller becomes 3c

Idk of this helps the blues
2.
WSH
  1. Kotkaniemi, Jesperi [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (MTL)
3.
WSH
4.
WSH
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (ARI)
5.
WSH
    Not to select V V and take Dillon
    SEA
    1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (WSH)
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    2022
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    2023
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $72 861 261 $472 927 $132 500 $8 638 739 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    9 200 000 $9 200 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
    AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    725 000 $725 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    716 667 $716 667 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    863 333 $863 333 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    791 667 $791 667 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    DG/DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    950 000 $950 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    G
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    9 mai 2021 à 18 h 43
    #1
    Hop on the Slaftrain
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 16,131
    Mentions "j'aime": 20,442
    Habs probably decline this one. The pick could be top 10 when they get back to normal divisions & they have not given up on Kotkaniemi. This is also the team that shipped out Domi, Kassian, Beaulieu, Galchenyuk due to attitude issues.
    9 mai 2021 à 18 h 44
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 10,250
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
    I think there's something here for STL - I think both Dunn and Eller can pull firsts in trades. STL will have a hole there if they don't bring certain UFAs back, but it might not be their most pressing hole. They are also probably better off keeping Dunn. I like the creativity here though.

    Kuznetsov's value is always so greatly debated. I think both he and KK get overrated in trades by their fanbases. I don't think this return is absurd, but it's steep. Although I think KK's ceiling is that of a 2C, and MTL urgently needs a 1C or first line offensive talent, this is a very patchwork move (that doesn't really fit their cap) that will hurt long term. Maybe dropping the pick a round will make more sense for each side.

    II see no complaint with the remaining moves
    Capitalfail67 a aimé ceci.
    9 mai 2021 à 18 h 47
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Caps fan idk why
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2016
    Messages: 11,237
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,344
    Quoting: SevenLeg
    Habs probably decline this one. The pick could be top 10 when they get back to normal divisions & they have not given up on Kotkaniemi. This is also the team that shipped out Domi, Kassian, Beaulieu, Galchenyuk due to attitude issues.


    Kuzy doesn’t have an attitude issue though? maybe maturity but Lav asked him to play better defensively and he has held up his end even though it’s hurt his offense. I can’t think of anyone ever saying he’s had a bad attitude ever. He’s generally a happy lovable guy.

    You can swap the 1st to 2021 if that makes you feel better but adding Kuzy will more than likely give them better odds at being a playoff team imo. I would t say this is them giving up on him. Just trading him for a much better player. Not like they moved him for a 2nd round pick
    Wqrrior a aimé ceci.
    9 mai 2021 à 18 h 52
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Caps fan idk why
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2016
    Messages: 11,237
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,344
    Modifié 9 mai 2021 à 18 h 58
    Quoting: Wqrrior
    I think there's something here for STL - I think both Dunn and Eller can pull firsts in trades. STL will have a hole there if they don't bring certain UFAs back, but it might not be their most pressing hole. They are also probably better off keeping Dunn. I like the creativity here though.

    Kuznetsov's value is always so greatly debated. I think both he and KK get overrated in trades by their fanbases. I don't think this return is absurd, but it's steep. Although I think KK's ceiling is that of a 2C, and MTL urgently needs a 1C or first line offensive talent, this is a very patchwork move (that doesn't really fit their cap) that will hurt long term. Maybe dropping the pick a round will make more sense for each side.

    II see no complaint with the remaining moves


    I’d be willing to swap the 1st to the 2021 where the draft seems like it’s going to be lackluster but Habs add a great Offensive center. I think Kuzy value is absolutely a 1st + good prospect / good roster player depending. Habs based on the team they have should be in a win now or win soon mode Kuzy fits that and is a 1c.

    Hopefully he has a great playoffs and they don’t have to trade him
    Wqrrior a aimé ceci.
    9 mai 2021 à 18 h 58
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 10,250
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
    Quoting: Capitalfail67
    I’d be willing to swap the 1st to the 2021 where the draft seems like it’s going to be lackluster but Habs add a great Offensive center. I think Kuzy value is absolutely a 1st + good prospect / good roster player depending. Habs based on the team they have should be in a win now or win soon mode Kuzy fits that and is a 1c.

    Hopefully he has a great playoffs and they don’t have to trade him


    Depending on where the first lands, it can be reasonable. I think 15 or later + KK is better. But you'd likely have to take back some cap for it to even be possible. Byron maybe.
    Capitalfail67 a aimé ceci.
    9 mai 2021 à 19 h 6
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Caps fan idk why
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2016
    Messages: 11,237
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,344
    Quoting: Wqrrior
    Depending on where the first lands, it can be reasonable. I think 15 or later + KK is better. But you'd likely have to take back some cap for it to even be possible. Byron maybe.


    Yeah I was thinking their 1st would be like 20 and up. They I assume Seattle would take Allen freeing up that cap. If they want Washington to take Byron I would make them pay like caps had to pay to dump Panik in the Wings deal. Idkid have to see how bad Byron is vs his cap hit
    9 mai 2021 à 19 h 10
    #7
    mokumboi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 28,478
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,075
    Quoting: Wqrrior
    I think there's something here for STL - I think both Dunn and Eller can pull firsts in trades. STL will have a hole there if they don't bring certain UFAs back, but it might not be their most pressing hole. They are also probably better off keeping Dunn. I like the creativity here though.



    There isn't. Bozak will likely be back for less than Eller makes.
    9 mai 2021 à 19 h 18
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Caps fan idk why
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2016
    Messages: 11,237
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,344
    Quoting: mokumboi
    There isn't. Bozak will likely be back for less than Eller makes.


    Even if he takes a little less Bozak sucks compared to Eller
    Bozak
    41.38cf% 41.75ff% 40.53xgf%

    Eller

    54.57cf% 53.42ff% 56.54xgf%

    If I was the blues I wouldn’t sign him. Looks like a liability. Eller is fantastic IMO. Bozak might b a 4c at this point in his career
    9 mai 2021 à 19 h 36
    #9
    Hop on the Slaftrain
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 16,131
    Mentions "j'aime": 20,442
    Quoting: Capitalfail67
    Kuzy doesn’t have an attitude issue though? maybe maturity but Lav asked him to play better defensively and he has held up his end even though it’s hurt his offense. I can’t think of anyone ever saying he’s had a bad attitude ever. He’s generally a happy lovable guy.

    You can swap the 1st to 2021 if that makes you feel better but adding Kuzy will more than likely give them better odds at being a playoff team imo. I would t say this is them giving up on him. Just trading him for a much better player. Not like they moved him for a 2nd round pick


    Thing is, adding Kuznetsov prevents the team from keeping Danault. It's basically Suzuki+Kotkaniemi+Danault+15ish overall pick or Suzuki+Kuznetsov and I take the 1st option.

    As for Kuznetsov, being scratched for disciplinary reasons and being banned from the Olympics is not exactly what I call a model player.
    9 mai 2021 à 19 h 39
    #10
    mokumboi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 28,478
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,075
    Quoting: Capitalfail67
    Even if he takes a little less Bozak sucks compared to Eller
    Bozak
    41.38cf% 41.75ff% 40.53xgf%

    Eller

    54.57cf% 53.42ff% 56.54xgf%

    If I was the blues I wouldn’t sign him. Looks like a liability. Eller is fantastic IMO. Bozak might b a 4c at this point in his career



    Heh. Let's add a little context to these numbers, shall we?

    Eller - 58% O-zone starts
    Bozak - 43% O-zone starts

    Bozak (who missed two months to injury in the middle of the season, mind you) has also spent a lot of his time centering Hoffman, and we all know what that means defensively 5v5. Then there's something even better than underlying numbers... overlying numbers.

    Eller - on ice for 21gf, 25ga
    Bozak on ice for 11gf, 15 ga

    Eller - .53 PPG
    Bozak - .55 PPG

    Finally, a couple more numbers to add color to the picture.

    Eller - 50% on draws
    Bozak - 57% on draws

    Eller - 2x3.5m after this season
    Bozak - something more affordable, one would presume

    The moral of the story: You can't just look at Corsi/Fenwick and judge a player or compare two. Bozak does not suck, which one who actually watched him play would know. The Blues aren't giving up Dunn for a redundant but pricey 32yo. Sorry.
    9 mai 2021 à 19 h 41
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    Caps fan idk why
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2016
    Messages: 11,237
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,344
    Quoting: SevenLeg
    Thing is, adding Kuznetsov prevents the team from keeping Danault. It's basically Suzuki+Kotkaniemi+Danault+15ish overall pick or Suzuki+Kuznetsov and I take the 1st option.

    As for Kuznetsov, being scratched for disciplinary reasons and being banned from the Olympics is not exactly what I call a model player.


    He’s on the covid list not a healthy scratch. Kuzy ban for coke and a ton of players do coke. “Model player” idk I played on the west coast and my buddy was in Kings camp. Kopitar was a coke monkey at the time. I would say he’s a “model player”. Danualt won’t sign to play 3c bet that.
    9 mai 2021 à 19 h 48
    #12
    Hop on the Slaftrain
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 16,131
    Mentions "j'aime": 20,442
    Quoting: Capitalfail67
    He’s on the covid list not a healthy scratch. Kuzy ban for coke and a ton of players do coke. “Model player” idk I played on the west coast and my buddy was in Kings camp. Kopitar was a coke monkey at the time. I would say he’s a “model player”. Danualt won’t sign to play 3c bet that.


    Kuznetsov and Samsonov were scratched because they arrived late at a meeting or something. Those Kopitar stories were not public, so it doesn't matter much. As soon as the Kassian story with the prostitutes came out, he was shipped out of town. This team is obsessed by their image. Danault is still the 2C and is still the 1C depending on the match ups. He's still ahead of Kotkaniemi and could be for two more years.
    9 mai 2021 à 19 h 56
    #13
    Démarrer sujet
    Caps fan idk why
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2016
    Messages: 11,237
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,344
    Modifié 9 mai 2021 à 20 h 1
    Quoting: mokumboi
    Heh. Let's add a little context to these numbers, shall we?

    Eller - 58% O-zone starts
    Bozak - 43% O-zone starts

    Bozak (who missed two months to injury in the middle of the season, mind you) has also spent a lot of his time centering Hoffman, and we all know what that means defensively 5v5. Then there's something even better than underlying numbers... overlying numbers.

    Eller - on ice for 21gf, 25ga
    Bozak on ice for 11gf, 15 ga

    Eller - .53 PPG
    Bozak - .55 PPG

    Finally, a couple more numbers to add color to the picture.

    Eller - 50% on draws
    Bozak - 57% on draws

    Eller - 2x3.5m after this season
    Bozak - something more affordable, one would presume

    The moral of the story: You can't just look at Corsi/Fenwick and judge a player or compare two. Bozak does not suck, which one who actually watched him play would know. The Blues aren't giving up Dunn for a redundant but pricey 32yo. Sorry.


    Lmfao your first stat is plus minus.literally the dumbest stat. Gives no context either. Like we’re the goals 5v5 or 5v4? Just dumb AF
    happyhappy
    Why xgf% is a smarter tool to use

    Their is literally 6 Capitals players that have less than 50% ozone starts.... 3 are forwards and 1 is Raffle who just joined the team... lol

    Bozak wins more face offs lol so far this is all you have

    Dunn for Eller might be a bad move depending on Blue view Dunn but Bozak sucks compared to Eller it’s not even close lol.
    9 mai 2021 à 19 h 58
    #14
    Démarrer sujet
    Caps fan idk why
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2016
    Messages: 11,237
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,344
    Quoting: SevenLeg
    Kuznetsov and Samsonov were scratched because they arrived late at a meeting or something. Those Kopitar stories were not public, so it doesn't matter much. As soon as the Kassian story with the prostitutes came out, he was shipped out of town. This team is obsessed by their image. Danault is still the 2C and is still the 1C depending on the match ups. He's still ahead of Kotkaniemi and could be for two more years.


    They were on the Covid list shortly after could have been the reason.? But If missing a meeting is an “attitude” issue the year the caps won the cup Ovi missed a game w an attitude issue also

    Lol Kass was caught w a hook lol how do you get caught doing that
    9 mai 2021 à 20 h 13
    #15
    Hop on the Slaftrain
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 16,131
    Mentions "j'aime": 20,442
    Quoting: Capitalfail67
    Lol Kass was caught w a hook lol how do you get caught doing that


    They crashed the car drunk lol
    Capitalfail67 a aimé ceci.
    9 mai 2021 à 20 h 18
    #16
    Démarrer sujet
    Caps fan idk why
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2016
    Messages: 11,237
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,344
    Quoting: SevenLeg
    They crashed the car drunk lol


    Lmfao idk how I didn’t hear about that. That’s terrible
    9 mai 2021 à 20 h 48
    #17
    mokumboi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 28,478
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,075
    Quoting: Capitalfail67
    Lmfao your first stat is plus minus.literally the dumbest stat. Gives no context either. Like we’re the goals 5v5 or 5v4? Just dumb AF
    happyhappy
    Why xgf% is a smarter tool to use...




    Heh. And what is xGF differential but expected plus minus? You just bashed your own stat much harder than you bashed mine, and don't even realize it. You can't just read Corsi stats and compare players, they require context and the realization that five other players are also out on the ice at all times. More to the point, you don't watch Bozak play, so your opinion of his play is one-dimensional.
    9 mai 2021 à 21 h 39
    #18
    Who adds what?
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 13,677
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
    Quoting: SevenLeg
    Habs probably decline this one. The pick could be top 10 when they get back to normal divisions & they have not given up on Kotkaniemi. This is also the team that shipped out Domi, Kassian, Beaulieu, Galchenyuk due to attitude issues.


    These are good points, and it sounds like in your view it would not make a difference that a Habs fan posted this one last week: https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/2379255

    You're saying the Habs traded Domi away because he's got a bad attitude, and proving it with a list of other character trades that ends with Galchenyuk for Domi. Galchenyuk must have had a REALLY bad attitude. smile
    Capitalfail67 a aimé ceci.
    9 mai 2021 à 21 h 54
    #19
    Démarrer sujet
    Caps fan idk why
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2016
    Messages: 11,237
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,344
    Quoting: mokumboi
    Heh. And what is xGF differential but expected plus minus? You just bashed your own stat much harder than you bashed mine, and don't even realize it. You can't just read Corsi stats and compare players, they require context and the realization that five other players are also out on the ice at all times. More to the point, you don't watch Bozak play, so your opinion of his play is one-dimensional.


    Lmfao what?!
    Xgf% is a stat where shot quality is used to determine which team is expected to score more goals when a certain player is one the ice by looking at the difference between expected goals for (xGF) and expected goals against (xGA).

    Your stats was gf vs ga... that’s literally plus minus but even more dumb bc you didn’t specify if some goals where pp pk for 5v5. Lol

    “ You can't just read Corsi stats and compare players, they require context and the realization that five other players are also out on the ice at all times.” This is the type of argument people make when stats clearly label a player A liability.

    His xgf% is 40.53%. Lol that’s terrible.... 3rd line centers are typically shutdown guys but this is awful. To add perspective to this. Last year Kuzy was heavily criticized for how awful he is at defense and his was 48.24%. Bozak is worse than that and Kuzy is bad at defense . .... like horrible
    10 mai 2021 à 2 h 25
    #20
    mokumboi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 28,478
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,075
    Quoting: Capitalfail67
    Lmfao what?!
    Xgf% is a stat where shot quality is used to determine which team is expected to score more goals when a certain player is one the ice by looking at the difference between expected goals for (xGF) and expected goals against (xGA).

    Your stats was gf vs ga... that’s literally plus minus but even more dumb bc you didn’t specify if some goals where pp pk for 5v5. Lol

    “ You can't just read Corsi stats and compare players, they require context and the realization that five other players are also out on the ice at all times.” This is the type of argument people make when stats clearly label a player A liability.

    His xgf% is 40.53%. Lol that’s terrible.... 3rd line centers are typically shutdown guys but this is awful. To add perspective to this. Last year Kuzy was heavily criticized for how awful he is at defense and his was 48.24%. Bozak is worse than that and Kuzy is bad at defense . .... like horrible



    Let's try this again. xGF% is literally a differential of expected goals vs expected goals against. It's precisely expected +/- (with 50% standing in as 0) and nothing more. Both stats require context. The same criticisms that apply to the +/- stat apply to the xGF% stat. The main difference if that games are decided by actual goals, and not by xGF. How are you not getting this?

    And frankly, you don't seem to understand xGF% anyway. A low xGF% doesn't automatically mean you;re bad at defense. It's just as likely to mean that their line is not generating enough chances, which has certainly been the case with Bozak lines earlier in the season. Since his return from injury, he's easily best one of the Blues' best players (3g, 10a and about 65% on draws in the last 16 games).

    Besides, only looking at 5v5 doesn't tell a complete story. Bozak plays on both special teams, and both have been on fire since he came back. Shouting "Bozak sucks" entirely from one stat you don;t even read right is not compelling. Sorry.
    10 mai 2021 à 2 h 44
    #21
    Démarrer sujet
    Caps fan idk why
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2016
    Messages: 11,237
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,344
    Modifié 10 mai 2021 à 3 h 1
    Quoting: mokumboi
    Let's try this again. xGF% is literally a differential of expected goals vs expected goals against. It's precisely expected +/- (with 50% standing in as 0) and nothing more. Both stats require context. The same criticisms that apply to the +/- stat apply to the xGF% stat. The main difference if that games are decided by actual goals, and not by xGF. How are you not getting this?

    And frankly, you don't seem to understand xGF% anyway. A low xGF% doesn't automatically mean you;re bad at defense. It's just as likely to mean that their line is not generating enough chances, which has certainly been the case with Bozak lines earlier in the season. Since his return from injury, he's easily best one of the Blues' best players (3g, 10a and about 65% on draws in the last 16 games).

    Besides, only looking at 5v5 doesn't tell a complete story. Bozak plays on both special teams, and both have been on fire since he came back. Shouting "Bozak sucks" entirely from one stat you don;t even read right is not compelling. Sorry.


    Lmfao this is great. You don’t know the difference between xgf% and gf%. Even when I literally told you what it was your blind ignorance didn’t allow you to read the words I typed to you. Let me EXPLAIN

    Gf% is what you think I mean
    21gf 25ga 45.65gf%

    Xgf% is a stat where SHOT QUALITY is used to determine which team is expected to score more goals when a certain player is on the ice by looking at the difference between expected goals for (xGF) and expected goals against (xGA).

    XGF%
    22.56xgf 17.35xga 56.54xgf%

    Now notice how one is different than the other. Lol JFC I swear people on this site. Read next time so annoying I need explain this 2x.

    “And frankly, you don't seem to understand xGF% anyway” lmfao the irony
    Bozak gf% vs xgf%

    11gf 15gf 42.31gf%

    8.34xgf 12.24xga 40.53xgf%

    This means that he gives up a ton of quality shots/ opportunities while he’s on the ice than he generates. That is literally “context” lol
    10 mai 2021 à 4 h 6
    #22
    mokumboi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 28,478
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,075
    Quoting: Capitalfail67
    Lmfao this is great. You don’t know the difference between xgf% and gf%. Even when I literally told you what it was your blind ignorance didn’t allow you to read the words I typed to you. Let me EXPLAIN

    Gf% is what you think I mean
    21gf 25ga 45.65gf%

    Xgf% is a stat where SHOT QUALITY is used to determine which team is expected to score more goals when a certain player is on the ice by looking at the difference between expected goals for (xGF) and expected goals against (xGA).

    XGF%
    22.56xgf 17.35xga 56.54xgf%

    Now notice how one is different than the other. Lol JFC I swear people on this site. Read next time so annoying I need explain this 2x.

    “And frankly, you don't seem to understand xGF% anyway” lmfao the irony
    Bozak gf% vs xgf%

    11gf 15gf 42.31gf%

    8.34xgf 12.24xga 40.53xgf%

    This means that he gives up a ton of quality shots/ opportunities while he’s on the ice than he generates. That is literally “context” lol



    Just for starters, *he* doesn't give up shot chances. He's on the ice at the time with five other players, not the same thing. As for the whole expected/actual business, I'm really not sure how that's even slightly tricky.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage