SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The Draft Predictions - Continued Reset

Créé par: yikes
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 8 mai 2021
Publié: 8 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 750 250 $
13 500 000 $
13 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
    BUF: Buffalo selects Owen Power
    ANA: Anaheim wants a steady C, Matthew Beniers
    SEA: Seattle goes with a steady D, Luke Hughes
    NJD: Builds their D core, Brandt Clarke
    CBJ: Columbus loads up with, Dylan Guenther
    DET: Ruins SJS day, Jesper Wallstedt
    SJS: San Jose finds dynamic C, Kent Johnson
    OTT: Takes a chance with, Chaz Lucius
    VAN: Adds some D, Simon Evindsson
    CAL: Takes solid C, William Eklund
    LA: Goes with shooter, Fabian Lysell

    Top 10
    BUF
    2.
    SJS
    SEA
    1. Gregor, Noah [Droits de RFA]
    2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
    3.
    SJS
    1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (SEA)
    Détails additionnels:
    SJS trade up with Donato on Draft Day with placeholder team.
    SEA
    1. Donato, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
    2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
    4.
    SJS
      San Jose has a solid roster still employing youth:
      Sasha
      Leonard
      Chek
      Balcers
      Bara (tho he’s 26-27 lool)
      Merkley
      Knyzhov
      Ferraro
      Korenar

      But we also have assets to trade if we suck again:
      Reimer
      Hertl
      Haula
      Simek

      All being good trade targets for contenders (with Simek being a better asset for a playoff team not a cup contender).
      SEA
      5.
      SJS
        New prospects that are noteworthy:
        Kent Johnson
        Joshua Roy (my target with a acquired 2nd)
        SEA
        1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
        2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (SEA)
        Rachats de contrats
        Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
        2021
        Logo de SJS
        Logo de SJS
        Logo de SJS
        Logo de COL
        Logo de SJS
        2022
        Logo de SJS
        Logo de SJS
        Logo de SJS
        Logo de SJS
        Logo de BUF
        Logo de SJS
        Logo de MIN
        2023
        Logo de SJS
        Logo de SJS
        Logo de SJS
        Logo de SJS
        Logo de SJS
        Logo de SJS
        Logo de SJS
        TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
        2181 500 000 $67 720 613 $0 $967 500 $13 779 387 $
        Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
        AG, AD
        NMC
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
        C
        M-NTC
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        1 750 250 $1 750 250 $
        AD, AG
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
        C
        M-NTC
        UFA - 6
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
        AD, AG
        UFA - 3
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
        AG, AD
        RFA - 1
        3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
        C, AG
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
        C
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        776 667 $776 667 $ (Bonis de performance110 000 $$110K)
        C, AG
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
        C
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 2
        Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        796 667 $796 667 $
        DG/DD
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
        DD
        NMC
        UFA - 6
        3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
        G
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
        DG
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
        DD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 4
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
        G
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
        DG/DD
        UFA - 3
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
        DD
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
        DG/DD
        NMC
        UFA - 5
        Équipe de réserve
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
        G
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
        C
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
        DG
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
        DG
        UFA - 1

        Code d'intégration

        • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
        • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

        Texte intégré

        Cliquer pour surligner
        8 mai 2021 à 14 h 11
        #1
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: avr. 2021
        Messages: 657
        Mentions "j'aime": 352
        San Jose should either trade down for or pick Wallstedt
        yikes a aimé ceci.
        8 mai 2021 à 14 h 15
        #2
        Banni
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2016
        Messages: 33,053
        Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
        So basically all top 10 teams stay in their current positions? If it were only that easy.
        jfrojelin a aimé ceci.
        8 mai 2021 à 14 h 15
        #3
        John Leonard Viewer
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2020
        Messages: 1,325
        Mentions "j'aime": 444
        Would not touch Johnson in the top10 for any team. Eklund is the second best player in the draft, absolutely take him as our only legit top line forward of the future
        8 mai 2021 à 14 h 16
        #4
        John Leonard Viewer
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2020
        Messages: 1,325
        Mentions "j'aime": 444
        Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
        So basically all top 10 teams stay in their current positions? If it were only that easy.


        BAHAHAHA AWWWWW
        8 mai 2021 à 14 h 35
        #5
        Bad Take Bot v1.02
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: août 2019
        Messages: 2,683
        Mentions "j'aime": 1,879
        Kent Johnson is the total DW pick, would be glad to have him.

        Quoting: QuackAttack
        San Jose should either trade down for or pick Wallstedt


        SJ does not draft goalies, last time SJ drafted a decent goalie was 2005, and that was Alex Stalock. It's never gonna happen.
        FunMustBeAlways et yikes a aimé ceci.
        8 mai 2021 à 14 h 38
        #6
        Sabres are elite
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2017
        Messages: 7,979
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,299
        If Eklund somehow falls out of top 5 every team who passes on him after that will regret it. Honestly I wouldn't be too surprised if he is selected 2nd depending on what team is up there. Power or Berniers 1st I'd say then its a toss up from there
        yikes a aimé ceci.
        8 mai 2021 à 14 h 45
        #7
        Démarrer sujet
        EklundCelebriniSmith
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: sept. 2019
        Messages: 10,057
        Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
        Modifié 8 mai 2021 à 15 h 9
        Quoting: QuackAttack
        San Jose should either trade down for or pick Wallstedt


        Quoting: Klara
        Kent Johnson is the total DW pick, would be glad to have him.



        SJ does not draft goalies, last time SJ drafted a decent goalie was 2005, and that was Alex Stalock. It's never gonna happen.


        Personally I think the Sharks should draft Wallstedt if available but it’s not worth drafting up imo

        Quoting: jfrojelin
        BAHAHAHA AWWWWW


        Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
        So basically all top 10 teams stay in their current positions? If it were only that easy.


        I cannot predict the future? I just simply went with the standings that I think will be the outcome. As it’s reasonable to think teams like Van with a ton of games left could rack up a good chunk of points. But trying to say which team or the other wins the lottery is basically pointless. I could easily say SJS wins the lottery and moves up some spots to get whomever but that’s once again pointless. The point was to see who’s gone based on my own thoughts. Which are not final or set in stone lol; I would like to see Wallstedt or Guenther for the Sharks but I just don’t think we’ll get them picking 6th, with Wallstedt potentially there but Guenther likely gone.

        Quoting: jfrojelin
        Would not touch Johnson in the top10 for any team. Eklund is the second best player in the draft, absolutely take him as our only legit top line forward of the future


        Quoting: Skyraider112
        If Eklund somehow falls out of top 5 every team who passes on him after that will regret it. Honestly I wouldn't be too surprised if he is selected 2nd depending on what team is up there. Power or Berniers 1st I'd say then its a toss up from there


        I personally don’t know enough but Eklund so I cannot say you’re wrong. I went with Johnson solely because Johnson likely could transition to wing and has a lot of talent. Additionally the familiarity of Bordeleau and Johnson is hard to overlook. Seeing as how Ferraro and Leonard came from UMASS I wouldn’t put it past management to see even more desire to combine Johnson and Bordeleau as a future duo as they are top teammates this past year and going into the next college season. Doesn’t mean it’ll work at all but it’s just a thought.



        Personally I see the highest stock in Wallstedt for the Sharks because I truly think he’s not a huge gamble. All goalies are gambles but I see Wallstedt like Knight. A great pick. Also if Lucius didn’t have a knee injury I’d think I’ve grown on him more recently to want to draft him. But knee injuries and the Sharks haven’t faired well (Hertl, Simek, Jumbo, etc). I really have no issue for who the Sharks draft unless it’s like Raty or drafting more OFD like Clarke (as I just don’t see value in stocking up on Karlsson, Burns, Merkley, Kniazev, Etc and Clarke). I like Clarke but he doesn’t fit well imo.

        For me it’s Wallstedt or Guenther but we easily will miss out on Guenther I think.
        8 mai 2021 à 14 h 46
        #8
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2020
        Messages: 5,204
        Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
        6th overall is still up for grabs. Just need the Wings, Kings, Flames, Sens and Canucks to come in clutch for us.

        Pass on Johnson though. If Eklund, Clarke or Lysell are still availible wherever we pick I’m taking of of them.
        yikes et JacobLyons a aimé ceci.
        8 mai 2021 à 14 h 50
        #9
        Démarrer sujet
        EklundCelebriniSmith
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: sept. 2019
        Messages: 10,057
        Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
        Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
        6th overall is still up for grabs. Just need the Wings, Kings, Flames, Sens and Canucks to come in clutch for us.

        Pass on Johnson though. If Eklund, Clarke or Lysell are still availible wherever we pick I’m taking of of them.


        Yeah the guys above mentioned Eklund. I haven’t done a ton of looking on him and I’m a fan of Johnson. I don’t think Clarke is right for us tho (comment above from me about all our OFD). I’m fine with Lysell.

        I’d think Guenther is my hope tho for the Sharks, with Wallstedt.
        8 mai 2021 à 18 h 41
        #10
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juill. 2019
        Messages: 392
        Mentions "j'aime": 286
        I agree with some of the guys above. I wouldn't take Johnson if Eklund and Edvinsson available. Going defense in this draft does intrigue me though, because the next two drafts are loaded at the top (where we're likely gonna pick) with offensive talent, so getting a defensemen like Edvinsson this year, and pairing that with Wright/Lambert/Savoie next year, and then Bedard/Michkov the year after that might be ideal.
        8 mai 2021 à 21 h 13
        #11
        John Leonard Viewer
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2020
        Messages: 1,325
        Mentions "j'aime": 444
        Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
        6th overall is still up for grabs. Just need the Wings, Kings, Flames, Sens and Canucks to come in clutch for us.

        Pass on Johnson though. If Eklund, Clarke or Lysell are still availible wherever we pick I’m taking of of them.


        Don't jinx us, looking good rn tho
        yikes a aimé ceci.
        8 mai 2021 à 21 h 17
        #12
        Démarrer sujet
        EklundCelebriniSmith
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: sept. 2019
        Messages: 10,057
        Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
        Quoting: jfrojelin
        Don't jinx us, looking good rn tho


        You mean,

        We’re looking bad 👈😎👈






        I actually despise how this year has started making me fine with losing the next two games. Tough times.
        JacobLyons et jfrojelin a aimé ceci.
        9 mai 2021 à 3 h 27
        #13
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2020
        Messages: 5,204
        Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
        Quoting: jfrojelin
        Don't jinx us, looking good rn tho


        Quoting: yikes
        You mean,

        We’re looking bad 👈😎👈






        I actually despise how this year has started making me fine with losing the next two games. Tough times.


        Sorry lads, I definitely jinxed it and got us the loser point tonight. Won't let it happen again.
        yikes et jfrojelin a aimé ceci.
        9 mai 2021 à 10 h 21
        #14
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: mai 2019
        Messages: 1,662
        Mentions "j'aime": 506
        I'd like to get Barabanov long term, he's legit, pt per game w/ Hertl & Kane. I don't see what most do in Leonard, he's like Donoto, both avg. IMO? I'm fine w/ Balcers on the 3rd L instead of Leonard & resign Nieto for the 4th L.
        13 mai 2021 à 0 h 54
        #15
        Phenchod
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juill. 2019
        Messages: 408
        Mentions "j'aime": 74
        Knights and sharks succcc
         
        Répondre
        To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
        Question:
        Options:
        Ajouter une option
        Soumettre le sondage