SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Eriksson to new jersey

Créé par: The_Rocket
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 6 mai 2021
Publié: 6 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
If the cost is any higher then I’m not doin it
Transactions
VAN
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
NJD
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. Gadjovich, Jonah
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de BUF
Logo de VAN
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1581 500 000 $51 275 659 $648 780 $1 050 000 $30 224 341 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
786 111 $786 111 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 mai 2021 à 20 h 23
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 174
Mentions "j'aime": 122
Marleau at 6.25M$ at 1yr left not during covid costed a 1st. It's 100% going to take more than what you offer.
6 mai 2021 à 20 h 25
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,088
Mentions "j'aime": 18,336
2022 2nd + Gadjovich
or Jurmo and later pick
tgasp98 a aimé ceci.
6 mai 2021 à 21 h 7
#3
Démarrer sujet
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,935
Mentions "j'aime": 3,578
Quoting: NHLfan10506
2022 2nd + Gadjovich
or Jurmo and later pick


Okay I could see jurmo being a good option instead of Gadjovich. LD is a strong point for the organization anyways.

Quoting: JulHok92
Marleau at 6.25M$ at 1yr left not during covid costed a 1st. It's 100% going to take more than what you offer.


This is such a tired talking point. Eriksson and Marleau are not comparable. Marleau had a full no love clause and only agreed to be traded if the team aquiring him would buy him out. His buyout cap hit was 6.25 million. That means he can’t be buried, can’t be played, can’t be healthy scratch. Carolina had to take on the full weight of his contract and didn’t even get a roster player for doing so. On top of that, Toronto had 0 leverage. They HAD to trade him in order to sign their RFA’s, there was no other option.

Vancouver doesn’t not have to trad Eriksson, if the price is too high they can hold him. As well, his cap hit is much lower, if he is buried its only 4.875 million, or bought out its only 4 million. Way less than the 6.25 million cap hit for marleau’s buy out. Eriksson also only has a 15 team no trade list, so he can’t be as choosy as Marleau about where to go.

If Marleau costs a 1st to dump, than Eriksson definitely costs less than a 1st, a lot less. And if a team isn’t willing to take it, then the Canucks will just bury him in the minors for one more year. Not a big deal
NHLfan10506 a aimé ceci.
6 mai 2021 à 21 h 19
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,403
Mentions "j'aime": 632
Quoting: The_Rocket
Okay I could see jurmo being a good option instead of Gadjovich. LD is a strong point for the organization anyways.



This is such a tired talking point. Eriksson and Marleau are not comparable. Marleau had a full no love clause and only agreed to be traded if the team aquiring him would buy him out. His buyout cap hit was 6.25 million. That means he can’t be buried, can’t be played, can’t be healthy scratch. Carolina had to take on the full weight of his contract and didn’t even get a roster player for doing so. On top of that, Toronto had 0 leverage. They HAD to trade him in order to sign their RFA’s, there was no other option.

Vancouver doesn’t not have to trad Eriksson, if the price is too high they can hold him. As well, his cap hit is much lower, if he is buried its only 4.875 million, or bought out its only 4 million. Way less than the 6.25 million cap hit for marleau’s buy out. Eriksson also only has a 15 team no trade list, so he can’t be as choosy as Marleau about where to go.

If Marleau costs a 1st to dump, than Eriksson definitely costs less than a 1st, a lot less. And if a team isn’t willing to take it, then the Canucks will just bury him in the minors for one more year. Not a big deal


and ur wrong, more delusion from nucks fans
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage