SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Labanc to Islanders and Burns to SEA

Créé par: CheechYou
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 6 mai 2021
Publié: 6 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
LABANC TO ISLES: No secret that Labanc would be a perfect fit on the Isles (fun fact: he'll also be a home-state boy). Keep in mind the 1st coming back SJ's way would be a late pick likely between 22-31. It's fair value.

NIETO: Instead of doing a 1.5mil cap hit over 2yrs, have a handshake deal where you overpay Nieto for this year at 2mil so that SJ can pay him 1mil next year to save as much money for Ferraro and Hertl's extensions as possible. Of course the big help is Raanta's 4mil coming off the books on a 1yr deal and have Melnichuk replace him.

SIMEK: Anywhere for anything -- but just because he's not 22 or scoring 15 goals a season doesn't mean he's a negative asset. He's 28, which is prime years for a dman, a defensive 3rd pairing physical guy who plays hard, has decent skating, hits a ton, and while ideally his cap hit would be 2mil for 2 more seasons instead of 2.25mil for 3 more, that isn't a terrible difference. PLUS: there'll be some teams that will lose their depth guy on defense with the expansion draft -- Simek is a good replacement for that. I get that he might not return a 3rd or even a 4th, but he's not a negative asset. A 5th is reasonable. Sharks keep him if he's a right-handed shot -- they're too cramped on the left side with Ferraro+Kniazhov+MEV (and his unmovable contract) who's actually been very solid over the last stretch of 12-13 games on a side note, not to mention Pasichnuk and Kniazev waiting in the ranks.

HOLL: Leafs are ready to lose him for nothing so this is a good deal going back their way for fair value.

UFA SIGNINGS: I can see Granlund, Barrie, Raanta, and Armia all taking those deals. They're fair value yet on the higher expected offer side, plus there's a Finnish connection for three of those guys and Barrie gets not just his fair cap hit but the term he's looking for.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
21 275 000 $
21 275 000 $
21 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
1850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
45 000 000 $
21 500 000 $
33 000 000 $
14 000 000 $
45 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Donato, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
4.
TOR
  1. Meloche, Nicolas [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
5.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (MTL)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de DAL
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de NYI
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $69 972 030 $0 $212 500 $11 527 970 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
776 667 $776 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance110 000 $$110K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 mai 2021 à 17 h 30
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,721
Mentions "j'aime": 5,223
Highly doubt Leafs expose Holl. 4-4-1 seems much more likely route.
Engvall_Enjoyer a aimé ceci.
6 mai 2021 à 17 h 40
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 39,990
Mentions "j'aime": 18,313
I like what I have seen from Simek
And think he would be moveable.

What’s the current ask for Karlsson?
CheechYou a aimé ceci.
6 mai 2021 à 17 h 52
#3
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,957
Mentions "j'aime": 927
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I like what I have seen from Simek
And think he would be moveable.

What’s the current ask for Karlsson?


I don't think anyone wants to take that contract on. Everyone on this website seems to want 50% retention and the Sharks to throw in a 1st. He's not getting moved imo.
6 mai 2021 à 17 h 55
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 39,990
Mentions "j'aime": 18,313
Quoting: goodfella
I don't think anyone wants to take that contract on. Everyone on this website seems to want 50% retention and the Sharks to throw in a 1st. He's not getting moved imo.


Probably not.
But Devils have big time need on defense.
And tons of cap room (actually hitting cap floor might be an issue if Seattle takes Subban).
So while unlikely, NJD is one possible place for him.
6 mai 2021 à 18 h 16
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I like what I have seen from Simek
And think he would be moveable.

What’s the current ask for Karlsson?


Current ask for Karlsson is “please take him? Please.”
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
6 mai 2021 à 18 h 16
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Labanc isn’t getting a first.
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
6 mai 2021 à 18 h 18
#7
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,436
Mentions "j'aime": 22,639
"HOLL: Leafs are ready to lose him for nothing so this is a good deal going back their way for fair value."

I read this scenario all the time....but really there is no logic behind it. So the Leafs expose both Holl and Dermot knowing one will be taken. So if they trade Holl and Dermot is selected by Seattle, the Leafs are down two NHL Dmen, instead of just one if they don't make the trade.
I'm just not saying it's a Leafs scenario but for other teams also.

Seattle still has think Burns is good value at 8m X 4 or else they won't select him. Maybe Seattle think there is much better value in signing Barrie and Granlund (which you did with the Burns cap space) than selecting Burns.
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
6 mai 2021 à 18 h 48
#8
Hockey Fan13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,916
Mentions "j'aime": 2,487
Granlund is a poor excuse for a center, great wing though.
palhal et SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
6 mai 2021 à 18 h 48
#9
Démarrer sujet
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,013
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: palhal

Seattle still has think Burns is good value at 8m X 4 or else they won't select him. Maybe Seattle think there is much better value in signing Barrie and Granlund (which you did with the Burns cap space) than selecting Burns.


If they're going to be taking a (likely mid-tier or depth) player from 31 other teams, and only have 3 spots for right-handed starters on defense and a choice to pick from for many middle-6 centers (top-level centers won't be exposed), chances are that they won't be signing players like Barrie and Granlund.

They'll take a run at a top-level UFA guy like Dougie Hamilton, yes, but not Barrie or Granlund.
6 mai 2021 à 19 h 10
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,286
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
Stars already have enough under performing bottom six wingers
6 mai 2021 à 21 h 50
#11
Go Sharks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 391
Mentions "j'aime": 53
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I like what I have seen from Simek
And think he would be moveable.

What’s the current ask for Karlsson?


Sharks would do a Subban for Karlsson deal immediately.
7 mai 2021 à 10 h 55
#12
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,325
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Overpay on the Seattle trade. The whole point of moving Burns is so in the long term future you can pay Leonard and Merkley,
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage