SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Simple next seasom

Créé par: Bruinsforlife
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 5 mai 2021
Publié: 5 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Don’t sign hall or rask, sign them after exp, protect Frederic over Ritchie because he’s younger, sign Reilly after the draft if he wants to

Offering kase a 1m 1y is a low risk good reward potential, if he can be healthy he’s a good option, but personnalité if we can sign cheaper let’s go but not over 1M for me
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
84 750 000 $
21 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
26 000 000 $
22 500 000 $
16 000 000 $
57 000 000 $
21 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
43 250 000 $
2750 000 $
2800 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
    Seattle
    ANA
    1. Ritchie, Nick [Droits de RFA]
    2.
    BOS
    1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
    3.
    BOS
    1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (MTL)
    BUF
    1. Moore, John
    2. Zboril, Jakub
    3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de TOR
    2022
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    2023
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $79 310 674 $1 956 507 $0 $2 189 326 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    C
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
    AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    C
    UFA
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    750 000 $750 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    DD
    UFA
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    5 mai 2021 à 13 h 6
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 2,851
    Mentions "j'aime": 639
    I don't like any of the trades. Too much to get rid of Moore, especially when you aren't even to the cap

    Too much for Tuukka, or let him walk I would hope krejci takes less, but I'd be ok with that for one year.

    Miller will get more if he is healthy.

    Too many years for McCabe, dude can't stay healthy, He is the Kase of defensemen.
    5 mai 2021 à 13 h 9
    #2
    The other ones Drai
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 1,860
    Mentions "j'aime": 689
    Oilers accept
    5 mai 2021 à 13 h 50
    #3
    Boi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 1,947
    Mentions "j'aime": 379
    You can use Seattle as a team now
    5 mai 2021 à 13 h 50
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 4,292
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,340
    Quoting: Propeller09
    I don't like any of the trades. Too much to get rid of Moore, especially when you aren't even to the cap

    Too much for Tuukka, or let him walk I would hope krejci takes less, but I'd be ok with that for one year.

    Miller will get more if he is healthy.

    Too many years for McCabe, dude can't stay healthy, He is the Kase of defensemen.

    Mccabe probably won’t be ready at the start of the season either. His leg injury was brutal.
    Propeller09 a aimé ceci.
    5 mai 2021 à 14 h 28
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 1,210
    Mentions "j'aime": 465
    I disagree with protecting Fred over Ritchie. I don't think Fred has the offensive potential that Ritchie does.
    5 mai 2021 à 14 h 44
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 2,851
    Mentions "j'aime": 639
    Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
    I disagree with protecting Fred over Ritchie. I don't think Fred has the offensive potential that Ritchie does.


    I think when you factor in number of years of team control - also, I think Ritchie's biggest asset is Debrusk stinking this year. If Debrusk does what he is supposed to do, we don't Ritchie on PP and top 6 and his production goes way down.

    Lauko, Steen and Studnicka should all be in the mix next year too. I don't see Ritchie in top 9 role.

    I think They would take Kase for pure potential. IF and I know it's big, but if he is healthy for 1st half of year, you can easily get a late 1st for him. When healthy, he is a top 6 player with very similar value to Debrusk.

    I saw an interesting Seattle mock pick where they trade Debrusk to Seattle to get them to take moore and the Bruins get a pick back. I think it was a 1st which is too much given the assumed high pick Seattle will have and Debrusk coming off a terrible year. There may have been another player involved too like Zboril or Kuhlman.
    5 mai 2021 à 19 h 49
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2021
    Messages: 1,048
    Mentions "j'aime": 326
    Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
    I disagree with protecting Fred over Ritchie. I don't think Fred has the offensive potential that Ritchie does.


    Agreed but I think Boston finds a way of keeping both. If they do that would mean DeBrusk as the odd man out either in a trade or expansion draft deal. Cassidy has come out and said he likes his "heavy" 3rd line of Ritchie/Kuraly/Coyle. I think the playoffs will go a long way to determining what the Bruins do regarding DeBrusk/Ritchie.
    VilleKoho a aimé ceci.
    5 mai 2021 à 20 h 29
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2021
    Messages: 1,048
    Mentions "j'aime": 326
    Quoting: Propeller09
    I think when you factor in number of years of team control - also, I think Ritchie's biggest asset is Debrusk stinking this year. If Debrusk does what he is supposed to do, we don't Ritchie on PP and top 6 and his production goes way down.

    Lauko, Steen and Studnicka should all be in the mix next year too. I don't see Ritchie in top 9 role.

    I think They would take Kase for pure potential. IF and I know it's big, but if he is healthy for 1st half of year, you can easily get a late 1st for him. When healthy, he is a top 6 player with very similar value to Debrusk.

    I saw an interesting Seattle mock pick where they trade Debrusk to Seattle to get them to take moore and the Bruins get a pick back. I think it was a 1st which is too much given the assumed high pick Seattle will have and Debrusk coming off a terrible year. There may have been another player involved too like Zboril or Kuhlman.


    Don't devalue what Ritchie has done this year by saying his biggest asset is DeBrusk stinks. Ritchie, although far from perfect is a top9 because his assets include size, good hands and some toughness. He has earned it. The biggest asset of DeBrusk stinking is that we went out and got Hall, a legitimate and much better top6 than DeBrusk.
    Bruins1054_gmb a aimé ceci.
    6 mai 2021 à 8 h 47
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 2,851
    Mentions "j'aime": 639
    Quoting: BruinsCharlies
    Don't devalue what Ritchie has done this year by saying his biggest asset is DeBrusk stinks. Ritchie, although far from perfect is a top9 because his assets include size, good hands and some toughness. He has earned it. The biggest asset of DeBrusk stinking is that we went out and got Hall, a legitimate and much better top6 than DeBrusk.


    If they weren't going to protect Frederic, they would have traded him. He was injured and then healthy scratch. I like Ritchie, but he is barely a top 9 forward. He is a big body with decent hands. His biggest asset was Debrusk being terrible, or he doesn't end up in top 6. Since Hall got to Boston, Ritchie has been on 4th line frequently. If Debrusk Produces at all, Ritchie is on the 3rd line to start the year and his production is much lower.

    Also - I don't think he can play better consistently. He gets a lot of garbage goals - which is good. This year was his ceiling IMO. 15-20 goals max. I may agree, although I need to see more that Rithcie has a higher offensive potential, but Frederic will be a better all around player.

    For as big and tough as Ritchie is, he is letting Frederic fight Wilson while he fights Matt Irwin.

    IMO Ritchie is a guy you let score 15 and hope someone else falls in love with him - much like Beleskey.

    Would you rather have Beleskey or Greg Campbell?
    6 mai 2021 à 11 h 3
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 23,958
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,726
    Quoting: ConnorMcJesus
    Oilers accept


    Nah. The guy stunk this season, he doesn't backcheck and is guaranteed $4.8M after next season. The Oilers should hang onto their picks and spend that money in free agency - they shouldn't have a problem getting a better player for the same money.
    6 mai 2021 à 16 h 54
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2021
    Messages: 1,048
    Mentions "j'aime": 326
    Quoting: Propeller09
    If they weren't going to protect Frederic, they would have traded him. He was injured and then healthy scratch. I like Ritchie, but he is barely a top 9 forward. He is a big body with decent hands. His biggest asset was Debrusk being terrible, or he doesn't end up in top 6. Since Hall got to Boston, Ritchie has been on 4th line frequently. If Debrusk Produces at all, Ritchie is on the 3rd line to start the year and his production is much lower.

    Also - I don't think he can play better consistently. He gets a lot of garbage goals - which is good. This year was his ceiling IMO. 15-20 goals max. I may agree, although I need to see more that Rithcie has a higher offensive potential, but Frederic will be a better all around player.

    For as big and tough as Ritchie is, he is letting Frederic fight Wilson while he fights Matt Irwin.

    IMO Ritchie is a guy you let score 15 and hope someone else falls in love with him - much like Beleskey.

    Would you rather have Beleskey or Greg Campbell?


    If Boston signs Hall they have Marchand and Hall as top6 LW. Better hope someone falls in love with Ritchie or DeBrusk because Boston won't be paying DeBrusk 3.675M or Ritchie 2.5-3M to play on the 4th line. That's Frederic's spot for next year. Would be nice to get good value whether through a trade or expansion draft transaction for whichever one who ends up leaving.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage