SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

Columbus Blue Jackets signed Justin Danforth (1 Year / $750,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


3 mai 2021 à 20 h 9
#1
Justin Danforth has signed a new contract with the Columbus Blue Jackets.
Contrat standard
Contrats comparablesCOMPARER CE CONTRAT
SIGNÉ PAR: Jarmo Kekalainen
Durée: 1 an
Valeur: 750 000 $
Statut à l’échéance du contrat: UFA
% Cap Info-bulle: 0,92
Contrat signé avec: Logo de Blue Jackets de ColumbusBlue Jackets de Columbus
Date de signature: 3 mai 2021
Source: CapFriendly

Justin Danforth a signé un contrat de 1 ans d'une valeur de 750 000 $ avec les Blue Jackets de Columbus, le 3 mai 2021. Le contrat comporte un cap hit de 750 000 $.

SAISONClauseCap hitInfo-bulleAAV Info-bulleBonis de performanceInfo-bulleBonis de signatureInfo-bulleSalaire de baseInfo-bulleSalaire totalInfo-bulleSalaire mineuresInfo-bulle
2021-22750 000 $750 000 $0 $0 $750 000 $750 000 $750 000 $
TOTAL750 000 $750 000 $0 $0 $750 000 $750 000 $750 000 $
3 mai 2021 à 21 h 41
#2
Canes hockey.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 265
Mentions "j'aime": 331
55 points in 58 khl games, hopefully his trip to america goes well unlike last time (dude was good in echl at 24 now 28)
4 mai 2021 à 12 h 40
#3
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,361
Mentions "j'aime": 4,177
There Is No Such Thing As A Bad ELC
ddottay a aimé ceci.
5 mai 2021 à 18 h 43
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 345
Mentions "j'aime": 234
Quoting: dopplsan
There Is No Such Thing As A Bad ELC


Technically not an ELC. Does that make it bad? I’m not sure.
5 mai 2021 à 18 h 49
#5
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,474
Mentions "j'aime": 6,450
Quoting: rebecca
Technically not an ELC. Does that make it bad? I’m not sure.


Anything that can be buried ($1.05M) without affecting the cap can never be considered a bad contract. All it affects at that point is the bottom-line of a billionaire which has absolutely zero consequence for the fans.
5 mai 2021 à 19 h 12
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 345
Mentions "j'aime": 234
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
Anything that can be buried ($1.05M) without affecting the cap can never be considered a bad contract. All it affects at that point is the bottom-line of a billionaire which has absolutely zero consequence for the fans.


This is all true. But also to consider:
- taking up a spot towards the 50 contract cap
- blocking development opportunities for young players
- yeah, k that’s about it.

I think it’s a fine deal. Everyone looking for their own personal Carter Verhaeghe. Gonna have to sign a few more to increase the odds I think.
5 mai 2021 à 20 h 51
#7
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,474
Mentions "j'aime": 6,450
Quoting: rebecca
This is all true. But also to consider:
- taking up a spot towards the 50 contract cap
- blocking development opportunities for young players
- yeah, k that’s about it.

I think it’s a fine deal. Everyone looking for their own personal Carter Verhaeghe. Gonna have to sign a few more to increase the odds I think.


Everyone treats the 50-man list like some sort of demon and yet only two teams hit that cap this year. If an NHL GM has done his job, there will be un-renewed contracts at the end of the season. Or he can trade those same expiring assets for picks.

We as fans tend to take a very surface-level approach to how we view the AHL (and even the ECHL). Reality is, most AHL rosters have almost 30 names rotating in and out on a nightly basis, especially if the parent club doesn't have complete ownership of their AHL/ECHL teams. Players can sometimes be assigned to other AHL teams depending on the circumstance. Teams are starting to trust European systems more than they used to and foreign prospects are often left to develop in equivalent (or better) leagues than the AHL.

Unless the contract in question is a Michael Haley type, there is never a bad contract below that $1.05M mark. The trick is to at least sign actual hockey players. Not every team is there yet, but the league is trending in that direction.
rebecca a aimé ceci.
5 mai 2021 à 21 h 13
#8
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,361
Mentions "j'aime": 4,177
Quoting: rebecca
Technically not an ELC. Does that make it bad? I’m not sure.


There Is No Such Thing As A Bad League-Minimum Contract.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage