No way Columbus does that

No need to even look at the names other than Bjorkstrand. There's more than two assets in the return, therefore you're not offering anything whatsoever of quality, so absolutely not.

Its ok the bruins reject that immediately

Thats awful for the bruins, easy reject

Care to explain why? Bjorkstrand is strictly better than DeBrusk and locked up long term, the rest of the pieces are pretty irrelevant

Joking right?

bc it doesnt make any sense for the bruins to do this. Why get a top6 RW just to play him on 3LW? Just play JD there and save the assets. This ACGM smoking that good good.

Probably because Bjorkstrand is significantly better than DeBrusk and Boston isn't giving up any serious assets for this?

a 2nd is not irrelevent by any means.

Hall and Moore can cancel out if you are that anti bruins, idc lmao

Bjorkstrand is not a 2nd better than debrusk. Debrusk is younger and plays bigger... He is streaky, but thats the downside

Objectively, bruins reject. Sorry man
research will always win

Research? Thats a weird way of spelling biased.

Bjorkstrand is easily a 1st better than DeBrusk

Not a single word there coulda been replaced with biased lmao
so that joke was a fail hahahahaha

and you are objectively wrong.
So at least try to be right when making a point lmao

That was a funny ass comment

Please elaborate on how I am objectively wrong because not a single team in the league would take DeBrusk and a 2nd over Bjorkstrand

Just did a few times.

You are the only one that hasnt provided information or stats lmao

come on dude

What information or stats have you provided besides saying DeBrusk is 1 year younger? I've said quite clearly Bjorkstrand is locked up long term and a much better player

You are so ignorant its sad.

idc lmao im right and thats all that matters

What an ironic statement

The only one being ignorant here is you.
From the picture below you can clearly see that Bjorkstrand is the much better player, its a black and white difference

Scoring Goals Per Game Point Shares Adjusted
Player Tm Lg Pos Season Age GP G A PTS +/- PIM EV PP SH GW S S% TOI G A PTS S OPS DPS PS G A PTS
Jake Debrusk BOS NHLLW 2019-20 23 65 19 16 35 -1 14 12 7 0 5 161 11.8 1043 0.29 0.25 0.54 2.48 2.6 1.2 3.8 22 19 41
Jack Hughes NJD NHLC 2019-20 18 61 7 14 21 -26 10 3 4 0 2 123 5.7 968 0.11 0.23 0.34 2.02 0.1 0.3 0.4 8 17

Lmao
current stats isnt everything - if it were, I woulda traded debrusk for hughes last year
Take contract, potential, position, age, etc into account.
you need to learn before commenting

LMFAO What? What the hell does jack Hughes, a very recent 1st overall rookie have to do with this? What I posted isnt current stats, thats a 3 year time frame (hint - it literally says that at the bottom of the image)

You obviously have no idea what you are talking about, I hand you clear stats showing you the massive difference between the 2 players and you attempt to deflect it because you know you cant win

"Research always wins"

You really dont get it do you. Aight im out

you are helpless lmao

Get what? You never made a point. All you did was throw random bull**** at the wall to see what sticks.

Are you trying to say DeBrusk was better than Hughes last year and that you wouldnt have traded them 1 for 1? Because thats a blatant lie. Boston would have taken that and run

Lmao damn. Sad hahahahahaha

So youve turned to insults as your only answer. I see my time is wasted trying to have a debate with you at all. But alsa, i shouldn't expect anything else from children

Lmao, damn you really dont learn