SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

I love MO but

Créé par: Jameshgfgn
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 29 avr. 2021
Publié: 29 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 150 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 100 000 $
64 150 000 $
1750 000 $
11 000 000 $
31 150 000 $
33 000 000 $
44 300 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
TOR
  1. Domi, Max (2 515 000 $ retained)
CBJ
  1. Engvall, Pierre
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. Denisenko, Grigori
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Kivihalme, Teemu
  2. Rielly, Morgan (2 000 000 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de FLA
Logo de TOR
Logo de FLA
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de FLA
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $77 518 116 $0 $400 000 $3 981 884 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
-1 190 000 $-1 190 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 avr. 2021 à 16 h 52
#1
Trad Breliving
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,492
Mentions "j'aime": 1,989
Doesn’t Pittsburgh already have an overload on the left side?
Leafsfan416 a aimé ceci.
29 avr. 2021 à 16 h 57
#2
Démarrer sujet
The commissioner
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 105
Quoting: ZachHymanForTheHart
Doesn’t Pittsburgh already have an overload on the left side?


Mike Matheson is their second pair LD with Cody ceci on the RD
A top pair of Reilly and Latang would be great
29 avr. 2021 à 17 h 13
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 817
Mentions "j'aime": 241
Quoting: Jameshgfgn
Mike Matheson is their second pair LD with Cody ceci on the RD
A top pair of Reilly and Latang would be great


Pittsburgh has on LD:
Dumoulin is on the top pair and very underrated.
Matheson
Petterson
Joesph
Riikola

Where does Rielly exactly fit in there?
29 avr. 2021 à 17 h 18
#4
In Pridham we trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 3,589
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
I'm pretty certain Leafs could move Rielly somewhere without having to retain.
29 avr. 2021 à 17 h 45
#5
Démarrer sujet
The commissioner
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 105
Quoting: Leafsfan416
Pittsburgh has on LD:
Dumoulin is on the top pair and very underrated.
Matheson
Petterson
Joesph
Riikola

Where does Rielly exactly fit in there?

Are you really trying to say rn that MO is not an upgrade on 99% of the guys you just wrote
29 avr. 2021 à 17 h 59
#6
In Zito We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 2,790
Mentions "j'aime": 1,596
Quoting: Jameshgfgn
Are you really trying to say rn that MO is not an upgrade on 99% of the guys you just wrote


the point is that they already have 5 NHL ready LDs so they don't need Rielly
Leafsfan416 a aimé ceci.
29 avr. 2021 à 17 h 59
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 817
Mentions "j'aime": 241
Quoting: Jameshgfgn
Are you really trying to say rn that MO is not an upgrade on 99% of the guys you just wrote


Um, can you read? I said where does Rielly fit in with Pittsburgh’s over crowed LD
Matheson has another 5 years
Petterson has another 4 years
Dumoulin has another 2 years

Why are you picking a team to trade Rielly to that has no need for him. Jim Rutherford is gone you are aware 😂
Faulk_my_Dzingel a aimé ceci.
29 avr. 2021 à 18 h 4
#8
Smythe.over.Hart
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,032
Mentions "j'aime": 2,348
Quoting: Leafsfan416
Um, can you read? I said where does Rielly fit in with Pittsburgh’s over crowed LD
Matheson has another 5 years
Petterson has another 4 years
Dumoulin has another 2 years

Why are you picking a team to trade Rielly to that has no need for him. Jim Rutherford is gone you are aware 😂


He might be. But JR would send another 1st and Dumoulin back.
Leafsfan416 a aimé ceci.
29 avr. 2021 à 18 h 6
#9
Démarrer sujet
The commissioner
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 105
Quoting: Leafsfan416
Um, can you read? I said where does Rielly fit in with Pittsburgh’s over crowed LD
Matheson has another 5 years
Petterson has another 4 years
Dumoulin has another 2 years

Why are you picking a team to trade Rielly to that has no need for him. Jim Rutherford is gone you are aware 😂


Quoting: VijayPatel11
the point is that they already have 5 NHL ready LDs so they don't need Rielly

That is a stupid mind set to have if you can improve a position you do it. Trade one of them don’t just be like well we could upgrade but because we have guys under contract we won’t
29 avr. 2021 à 18 h 19
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 817
Mentions "j'aime": 241
Quoting: Jameshgfgn
That is a stupid mind set to have if you can improve a position you do it. Trade one of them don’t just be like well we could upgrade but because we have guys under contract we won’t


I don’t even know why you are fighting this, it’s just a bad trade. They already went out and traded Hornqvist for Matheson, an offensive Dman. And now you think they should part with a former 1st rounder, a 1st round pick for Rielly who they will have to try and resign. 😂
Icehockey18121124 a aimé ceci.
29 avr. 2021 à 18 h 22
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 124
Mentions "j'aime": 66
Quoting: Jameshgfgn
That is a stupid mind set to have if you can improve a position you do it. Trade one of them don’t just be like well we could upgrade but because we have guys under contract we won’t


I think what is trying to be said is that Pit is not the team to move him to. Burke and Hextall have already said they will be saving future assets to build for the future. Giving up a 1st, the best D prospect and more for one year of a guy who would not be on the top PP or the top pairing as they will keep Dumo with Letang as they compliment each other very well is not a good move for the future.

Tor can find someone to trade with without out the retention which would be a big difference for Tor.
Leafsfan416 et Pensfan89 a aimé ceci.
29 avr. 2021 à 18 h 24
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 817
Mentions "j'aime": 241
Quoting: Icehockey18121124
I think what is trying to be said is that Pit is not the team to move him to. Burke and Hextall have already said they will be saving future assets to build for the future. Giving up a 1st, the best D prospect and more for one year of a guy who would not be on the top PP or the top pairing as they will keep Dumo with Letang as they compliment each other very well is not a good move for the future.

Tor can find someone to trade with without out the retention which would be a big difference for Tor.


This
29 avr. 2021 à 18 h 27
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Quoting: Jameshgfgn
That is a stupid mind set to have if you can improve a position you do it. Trade one of them don’t just be like well we could upgrade but because we have guys under contract we won’t


The trade doesn’t work because you are taking a guy on a ELC that’s likely going to be our 2nd or 3rd pair LD next year. Now we take Reilly on and have to trade one of Pettersson or Matheson just to take on 1 year of Reilly who the pens still wouldn’t be able to afford to re-sign. So it just doesn’t work. If you want to swap POJ with Matheson or even MP, then that’s a lot closer for Pittsburgh, but I doubt Toronto would want that Matheson contract.
29 avr. 2021 à 19 h 18
#14
Démarrer sujet
The commissioner
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 105
Quoting: Leafsfan416
This


Quoting: Icehockey18121124
I think what is trying to be said is that Pit is not the team to move him to. Burke and Hextall have already said they will be saving future assets to build for the future. Giving up a 1st, the best D prospect and more for one year of a guy who would not be on the top PP or the top pairing as they will keep Dumo with Letang as they compliment each other very well is not a good move for the future.

Tor can find someone to trade with without out the retention which would be a big difference for Tor.


Quoting: Pensfan89
The trade doesn’t work because you are taking a guy on a ELC that’s likely going to be our 2nd or 3rd pair LD next year. Now we take Reilly on and have to trade one of Pettersson or Matheson just to take on 1 year of Reilly who the pens still wouldn’t be able to afford to re-sign. So it just doesn’t work. If you want to swap POJ with Matheson or even MP, then that’s a lot closer for Pittsburgh, but I doubt Toronto would want that Matheson contract.


Here changed it
29 avr. 2021 à 19 h 40
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 817
Mentions "j'aime": 241
Quoting: Jameshgfgn
Here changed it


Constructed criticism, pick again.
Weegar Ekblad
Yandle Gudas
Kiersted Nutivaara
Gildon Stralman
29 avr. 2021 à 22 h 32
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,450
Mentions "j'aime": 2,962
Immediate no from the Jackets. Downgrading at C is not worth a 2nd.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage