SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Give me all the hate

Créé par: Jah1722
Équipe: 2021-22 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 29 avr. 2021
Publié: 29 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
64 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
1900 000 $
21 200 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
    If SEA thinks they can sign Heinen for less than QO. I think Henrique and Silfverberg contracts are too much. Shattenkirk’s is iffy. Stolarz might be an option.
    SEA
    1. Heinen, Danton [Droits de RFA]
    Détails additionnels:
    7-3-1: Rakell, Terry, Lundestrom, Lindblom, Jones, Volkov, Steel, Lindholm, Fowler, Fleury, Gibson.
    2.
    ANA
    1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
    3.
    ANA
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
    CAR
    1. Rakell, Rickard (1 894 722 $ retained)
    4.
    PHI
    1. Manson, Josh
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
    Détails additionnels:
    Top 8 protected. Manson extension.
    5.
    TBL
    1. Steel, Sam [Droits de RFA]
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de ANA
    2022
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de NSH
    2023
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $68 551 250 $0 $1 832 500 $12 948 750 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
    AG, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    822 500 $822 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    950 000 $950 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    900 000 $900 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    822 500 $822 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    G
    RFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    29 avr. 2021 à 16 h 43
    #1
    Lets Get Kraken
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 8,487
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,403
    Why would the Canes need or want Rakell?
    29 avr. 2021 à 16 h 45
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Jah1722
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 5,403
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
    Quoting: evelutions2
    Why would the Canes need or want Rakell?


    You’re right. Teams should never want good players. My bad.
    29 avr. 2021 à 16 h 46
    #3
    Lets Get Kraken
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 8,487
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,403
    Quoting: Jah1722
    You’re right. Teams should never want good players. My bad.

    With the lineup that the Canes have there is just no need for him.
    29 avr. 2021 à 16 h 48
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Jah1722
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 5,403
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
    Quoting: evelutions2
    With the lineup that the Canes have there is just no need for him.


    You mean a middle 6 that will have Fast McGinn and or Foegele?
    29 avr. 2021 à 16 h 50
    #5
    Lets Get Kraken
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 8,487
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,403
    Quoting: Jah1722
    You mean a middle 6 that will have Fast McGinn and or Foegele?


    Yeah. What about it
    29 avr. 2021 à 16 h 51
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2016
    Messages: 325
    Mentions "j'aime": 129
    Cirelli is an upgrade over Steel and Konecny might be an upgrade over Ricky but is that worth removing Manson and a first? And to take on more salary? Also, Carolina is in good cap position, why are we eating salary on Ricky? His contract is one of his most valuable assets. I really don't mean to pick on your moves but I just don't see how this makes us better.
    29 avr. 2021 à 16 h 53
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Jah1722
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 5,403
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
    Quoting: TheJoeMan
    Cirelli is an upgrade over Steel and Konecny might be an upgrade over Ricky but is that worth removing Manson and a first? And to take on more salary? Also, Carolina is in good cap position, why are we eating salary on Ricky? His contract is one of his most valuable assets. I really don't mean to pick on your moves but I just don't see how this makes us better.


    You really just want to keep everyone and hope the team magically becomes good don’t you?
    29 avr. 2021 à 17 h 44
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2016
    Messages: 325
    Mentions "j'aime": 129
    Quoting: Jah1722
    You really just want to keep everyone and hope the team magically becomes good don’t you?


    Not even remotely. Gibby, Zegras, and Drysdale are the only players I wouldn't consider moving. This team sucks. Bad. Big changes need to be made. These are just lateral moves.

    One of Rico/Silvy has to go. Among Terry, Comtois, Steel, Jones, Larsson, Lundestrom and Volkov, we need like three of them. I would like to see several of these guys packaged into a quality vet or two. Ricky and Mans are highly sought-after players and returns for them should reflect that. We don't need to trade either of them so if we do it better be for better players or lots of futures. What you're suggesting gives us neither.

    Bottom line is either should be turning our young assets into vets who can actually make this team better or just absolutely tear this team down and do a proper rebuild.
    29 avr. 2021 à 19 h 4
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Jah1722
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 5,403
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
    Quoting: TheJoeMan
    Not even remotely. Gibby, Zegras, and Drysdale are the only players I wouldn't consider moving. This team sucks. Bad. Big changes need to be made. These are just lateral moves.

    One of Rico/Silvy has to go. Among Terry, Comtois, Steel, Jones, Larsson, Lundestrom and Volkov, we need like three of them. I would like to see several of these guys packaged into a quality vet or two. Ricky and Mans are highly sought-after players and returns for them should reflect that. We don't need to trade either of them so if we do it better be for better players or lots of futures. What you're suggesting gives us neither.

    Bottom line is either should be turning our young assets into vets who can actually make this team better or just absolutely tear this team down and do a proper rebuild.


    Lol you want vets.
    29 avr. 2021 à 20 h 57
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 9,161
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,942
    Adding Rakell would be great but I don’t see us moving the 1st.
    29 avr. 2021 à 21 h 21
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    Jah1722
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 5,403
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
    Quoting: ecupirate07
    Adding Rakell would be great but I don’t see us moving the 1st.


    I figure it’s late in a poor draft. And you get him for just over 1.8M and CAR is already loaded with young talent and a very good prospect pool.
    30 avr. 2021 à 12 h 2
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2016
    Messages: 325
    Mentions "j'aime": 129
    Quoting: Jah1722
    Lol you want vets.


    Ugh, this is why I shouldn't try to have adult conversations with children.

    Vet = not a rookie. I.e. someone with NHL experience that can play a prominent role right now. If we're not developing our young players into quality vets (which we aren't with a number of them) then we need to turn them into players we know are quality vets. Or we can just let them continue to sputter and lose value while we replace our vets with guys who are just like them. You know this team is really bad right and our young "core" is a big reason for that, don't you?
    30 avr. 2021 à 12 h 59
    #13
    Démarrer sujet
    Jah1722
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 5,403
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
    Quoting: TheJoeMan
    Ugh, this is why I shouldn't try to have adult conversations with children.

    Vet = not a rookie. I.e. someone with NHL experience that can play a prominent role right now. If we're not developing our young players into quality vets (which we aren't with a number of them) then we need to turn them into players we know are quality vets. Or we can just let them continue to sputter and lose value while we replace our vets with guys who are just like them. You know this team is really bad right and our young "core" is a big reason for that, don't you?


    Lol you crack me up.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage