SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Off-Season

Créé par: Beetlejuice
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 28 avr. 2021
Publié: 28 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Chicago selects Carson Lambos with the 13th overall pick
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
1925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 500 000 $
32 500 000 $
11 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 200 000 $
21 750 000 $
23 420 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Keith, Duncan (2 038 462 $ retained)
3.
CHI
  1. Lavoie, Raphael
  2. Turris, Kyle
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Strome, Dylan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
4.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
NYR
  1. Zadorov, Nikita [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
5.
CHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Kämpf, David [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Anywhere
6.
ANA
  1. Kurashev, Philipp
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
2022 2nd can be upgraded to the lowest Chicago's 1st round pick, if Lindholm plays 55 games or more. 2023 second won't be sent to the ducks if the 2022 1st is sent.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de FLA
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de BOS
Logo de NYR
Logo de VGK
Logo de BOS
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $61 171 287 $452 439 $5 350 000 $20 328 713 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
3 420 000 $3 420 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 avr. 2021 à 16 h 22
#1
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
We don't need Zadorov. Value looks good tho
HOCKEYBOY448 a aimé ceci.
28 avr. 2021 à 16 h 25
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Not even close for Lindholm, And Danault turned down more to stay in Montreal. He's not taking less from Chicago.
28 avr. 2021 à 16 h 26
#3
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,841
Mentions "j'aime": 5,808
So why are we giving up Nylander for Seattle to take the guy they are already best off taking?
28 avr. 2021 à 16 h 29
#4
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,658
ducks don't do that
28 avr. 2021 à 16 h 33
#5
Démarrer sujet
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,315
Mentions "j'aime": 2,080
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Not even close for Lindholm, And Danault turned down more to stay in Montreal. He's not taking less from Chicago.

2 2nds and a good foward with a lot of potential for an upcoming ufa and considering Lindholm has been struggling with injuries for the past two seasons seems fair. Danault is having a down year and considering the flat cap economy, he'd be lucky if a team offered him what Montreal offered him in the beginning of the season so I don't think he gets more than 4.5 million.
28 avr. 2021 à 16 h 40
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,026
Mentions "j'aime": 9,322
Quoting: Beetlejuice
2 2nds and a good foward with a lot of potential for an upcoming ufa and considering Lindholm has been struggling with injuries for the past two seasons seems fair. Danault is having a down year and considering the flat cap economy, he'd be lucky if a team offered him what Montreal offered him in the beginning of the season so I don't think he gets more than 4.5 million.


I'm willing to bet a fair amount of money Lindholm leaves Anaheim next offseason if they don't move him. Unless he's so enamored with living in Orange County, not sure why he'd stay there. The Ducks, being in a rebuild themselves, would benefit from moving him. It's going to cost a first and good B+ young player or prospect or a really good young player or prospect A- plus a 2nd or 3rd. The hope is that the acquiring team can sign him to an extension. However, Ducks fans who've watched the past 2 trade deadlines in flat caps with limited team revenues need to understand he's not going to get more then that for a rental.
28 avr. 2021 à 16 h 53
#7
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,416
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: ChiHawk
I'm willing to bet a fair amount of money Lindholm leaves Anaheim next offseason if they don't move him. Unless he's so enamored with living in Orange County, not sure why he'd stay there. The Ducks, being in a rebuild themselves, would benefit from moving him. It's going to cost a first and good B+ young player or prospect or a really good young player or prospect A- plus a 2nd or 3rd. The hope is that the acquiring team can sign him to an extension. However, Ducks fans who've watched the past 2 trade deadlines in flat caps with limited team revenues need to understand he's not going to get more then that for a rental.


Chicago fans should stop trading a mid tier prospect and nothing picks for a legit top pairing Dman.
TrueCanuck a aimé ceci.
28 avr. 2021 à 17 h 4
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 325
Mentions "j'aime": 105
Oilers decline, with the cap space in the offseason and McLeods maturation they have no need to spill a first round pick & decent prospect for a career underachiever, simply because he’s friends with Connor
TrueCanuck et GrinReaper a aimé ceci.
28 avr. 2021 à 17 h 21
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,026
Mentions "j'aime": 9,322
Quoting: Jah1722
Chicago fans should stop trading a mid tier prospect and nothing picks for a legit top pairing Dman.


Early 2nd round pick is not a nothing pick. Not sure who the prospect is but guys like Suter, Kurashev, Nylander, Vlasic aren't mid tier prospects. Bottom line, Ducks aren't pulling in a massive hull for 1 year of Lindholm beyond what I mentioned above and it is unlikely IMO that Lindholm stays in Anaheim....no real reason to besides wanting to living Orange County. Many reasons why he would leave though.
28 avr. 2021 à 17 h 38
#10
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,416
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Modifié 28 avr. 2021 à 17 h 54
Quoting: ChiHawk
Early 2nd round pick is not a nothing pick. Not sure who the prospect is but guys like Suter, Kurashev, Nylander, Vlasic aren't mid tier prospects. Bottom line, Ducks aren't pulling in a massive hull for 1 year of Lindholm beyond what I mentioned above and it is unlikely IMO that Lindholm stays in Anaheim....no real reason to besides wanting to living Orange County. Many reasons why he would leave though.


Kurashev is a mid tier prospect at best. Pre season wasn’t even a top 5 prospect in a rather poor CHI prospect pool and hasn’t shown a lot in the NHL.

Is pick 45 really that good of a pick in a poor draft more than a nothing pick? You can come up with all the excuses you want but 1 yr off a top pair Dman is still worth a lot more than what’s offered here

Edit: I lied. It’s a 22 2nd with conditions and 23 2nd. But still not a great package.
TrueCanuck a aimé ceci.
28 avr. 2021 à 17 h 45
#11
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Edmonton's not gonna wanna do that, it doesn't make sense. Strome is nothing more than a solid 3C that can play 2C for a small amount of time but not a legit 2C. That alone isn't worth a B prospect and a 1st. If you're calling Turris a cap dump to improve the value then you're insane. He has 1 season left at a $1.65M cap hit that if they really wanted him gone that much, they can bury $1.075M of that in the minors next season. It's certainly not worth this over pay just to bring in one of McDavid's junior teammates
PerpetuallySad et GrinReaper a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage