SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rebuild

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 27 avr. 2021
Publié: 27 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
With our three picks we take Räty, Sillinger, and Lambos
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
21 200 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
42 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
64 500 000 $
13 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Beagle, Jay
  2. Eriksson, Loui
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
VAN
  1. Murphy, Connor
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (VGK)
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (PHI)
PHI
  1. Strome, Dylan
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
3.
4.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SEA)
Détails additionnels:
Taken Colton Dach with this pick.
SEA
  1. De Haan, Calvin
  2. Zadorov, Nikita [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Expansion considerations
5.
CHI
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (MTL)
MTL
  1. Kämpf, David [Droits de RFA]
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de PHI
Logo de VGK
Logo de SEA
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de FLA
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $71 135 176 $452 439 $5 882 500 $10 364 824 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $ (2 375 000 $$2M2 375 000 $$2M)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $ (4 875 000 $$5M4 875 000 $$5M)
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $ (1 875 000 $$2M1 875 000 $$2M)
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 avr. 2021 à 23 h 39
#1
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,535
Mentions "j'aime": 9,578
I have not heard such great things about Raty lately. Maybe that means someone can get him as a steal, but even on McKenzie's show he also had a chunk of scouts say hes solidily a 2nd round pick to them.
Kyle_Davidson a aimé ceci.
28 avr. 2021 à 0 h 26
#2
Sens Sicko from '06
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 519
Mentions "j'aime": 279
I'm going to be really surprised if Seattle trades any of their picks, especially any higher than the 4th round. I also think Canes say no, but crazier things have happened.

Also, I keep seeing relatively substantial contracts for Borgström (higher than $1 mil). I know he's doing pretty well in Liiga right now, I'm just wondering if he's been THAT good, considering only last year he was a failing prospect.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
28 avr. 2021 à 0 h 46
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Jarvis for Kubalik is a bad move IMO. He's played at a ppg rate in the AHL but we already have a proven goal scorer in the NHL.

I'm okay taking a chance on Raty but would draft Lambos and Sovzil both at LHD. Or better yet, take two of those picks and trade up to grab Evidsson around the #5 or #6 spots.
Kyle_Davidson a aimé ceci.
28 avr. 2021 à 1 h 3
#4
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,776
Mentions "j'aime": 5,734
Quoting: ChiHawk
Jarvis for Kubalik is a bad move IMO. He's played at a ppg rate in the AHL but we already have a proven goal scorer in the NHL.

I'm okay taking a chance on Raty but would draft Lambos and Sovzil both at LHD. Or better yet, take two of those picks and trade up to grab Evidsson around the #5 or #6 spots.


I like Kubalik, a lot, but I think trading him for Seth Jarvis makes sense for both teams and their timelines. I'm not an expert on the draft this year, but in this scenario I would love getting a LD, RD, and C from the three picks.
28 avr. 2021 à 1 h 42
#5
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 4,976
Mentions "j'aime": 4,043
no thanks to the canucks trade Beagle will most likely be on ltir and dumping a most likely a top 10 pick isnt wroth dumping eriksson
28 avr. 2021 à 1 h 54
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,188
Mentions "j'aime": 2,123
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
I like Kubalik, a lot, but I think trading him for Seth Jarvis makes sense for both teams and their timelines. I'm not an expert on the draft this year, but in this scenario I would love getting a LD, RD, and C from the three picks.


not really an RD that I like outside of Clarke that would go in the 1st. If we are in top 10, probably take a winger or center first (I'm quite partial to Lucius and Johnson). Top 5 take 1 of Hughes Clarke or Power. Top 15 take Lambos (hopefully). Rest of the draft depends on who we get with the 1st pick realistically. An ideal haul for me would be Hughes and if we can move up again into the 1st I'd like to snag Robertsson or Chibrikov in the later 1st. If we don't get the D we want with the 1st pick, I'd trade back a bit for Lambos and then reclaim some more assets.
28 avr. 2021 à 9 h 11
#7
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,776
Mentions "j'aime": 5,734
Quoting: theleano1
no thanks to the canucks trade Beagle will most likely be on ltir and dumping a most likely a top 10 pick isnt wroth dumping eriksson


You are only addressing half of the trade.
28 avr. 2021 à 13 h 16
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: SlickWilly
not really an RD that I like outside of Clarke that would go in the 1st. If we are in top 10, probably take a winger or center first (I'm quite partial to Lucius and Johnson). Top 5 take 1 of Hughes Clarke or Power. Top 15 take Lambos (hopefully). Rest of the draft depends on who we get with the 1st pick realistically. An ideal haul for me would be Hughes and if we can move up again into the 1st I'd like to snag Robertsson or Chibrikov in the later 1st. If we don't get the D we want with the 1st pick, I'd trade back a bit for Lambos and then reclaim some more assets.


Sovzil is arguably a better prospect then Lambos and regularly overlooked. Also would take Evidsson if outside of the top 3 as he is a big stay at home defender with 1st line potential and that is exactly what we need to pair with guys like Boqvist or Mitchell.
SlickWilly a aimé ceci.
28 avr. 2021 à 15 h 42
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,188
Mentions "j'aime": 2,123
Quoting: ChiHawk
Sovzil is arguably a better prospect then Lambos and regularly overlooked. Also would take Evidsson if outside of the top 3 as he is a big stay at home defender with 1st line potential and that is exactly what we need to pair with guys like Boqvist or Mitchell.


I actually did forget about Svozil. He's definitely a guy I would consider too in that Lambos range but I dont think I would take either of them higher than 12th or so, which then goes back to the trade back solution if we land in that later end of the top 10 range. Edvinsson has been interesting to me. I've seen him ranked all over the board, with some people ranking him in the 20s, and I personally haven't watched him a whole lot. If Stan and Kelley evaluate him as a top end talent, I won't argue, but if they decide he's not high on their board, I also won't be mad.
28 avr. 2021 à 15 h 56
#10
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 4,976
Mentions "j'aime": 4,043
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
You are only addressing half of the trade.


Surley you don't think Conner Murphay is worth a top 10 pick?
28 avr. 2021 à 16 h 24
#11
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,776
Mentions "j'aime": 5,734
Modifié 28 avr. 2021 à 17 h 9
Quoting: theleano1
Surley you don't think Conner Murphay is worth a top 10 pick?


No, now you are only addressing the other half of the trade! Just to be safe I'll go ahead and break this down further...

I consider Connor Murphy to be worth a first, perhaps even more with an extension... but I'll leave that out of an already complicated equation. Let's say that he is worth a pick in the 17-23 range, without an extension. If you add in the cost I think it should be to dump Eriksson (which IMO is 2 2nd round picks), theoretically, that should be in the ballpark of the value for a pick outside of the top ten. For argument's sake, let's say that that Beagle retires and his 3 mil cap hit vanishes (not how it works, but details), the value is still decent to get that first-round pick especially with the hawks adding in a pick next year for good measure. By points percentage you guys are 12th worst in the league, so assuming the pick is 12th overall you guys are giving up that pick for cap space (6-9 million), A partner for Quinn Hughes, and a pick in next years draft.
ChiHawk et zzhaiser a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage