SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

could this work

Équipe: 2021-22 Hurricanes de la Caroline
Date de création initiale: 27 avr. 2021
Publié: 27 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
36 000 000 $
2925 000 $
33 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
68 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
CAR
SEA
  1. Bean, Jake [Droits de RFA]
3.
CAR
  1. Kulak, Brett
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
MTL
  1. Foegele, Warren [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (STL)
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de LAK
2022
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de ANA
Logo de CAR
2023
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $74 348 583 $0 $537 500 $7 151 417 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
8 460 250 $8 460 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 025 000 $4 025 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 avr. 2021 à 6 h 4
#1
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 976
Okay, but have you considered that Skjei is pretty bad?
CMcAvoy73 a aimé ceci.
27 avr. 2021 à 6 h 21
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,403
Mentions "j'aime": 632
Quoting: MelonVK
Okay, but have you considered that Skjei is pretty bad?


Except he isnt
27 avr. 2021 à 6 h 50
#3
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 976
Quoting: habsfan00
Except he isnt


What does he do well?
27 avr. 2021 à 7 h 36
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: habsfan00
Except he isnt


In 2017 you were right.
MelonVK a aimé ceci.
27 avr. 2021 à 7 h 52
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 834
Mentions "j'aime": 175
I don’t mind the Kulak trade, but I just don’t see MTL & CAR getting together on a deal after the Aho fiasco...
habsfan00 a aimé ceci.
27 avr. 2021 à 8 h 2
#6
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 976
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
In 2017 you were right.


Although I'm not actually sure he was the main factor there. If you look at shot maps it looks more like someone was really good at tapping his shots onto net.
27 avr. 2021 à 8 h 14
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: MelonVK
Although I'm not actually sure he was the main factor there. If you look at shot maps it looks more like someone was really good at tapping his shots onto net.


Well i don’t. I watched him play and he was real good for a couple years in New York.
27 avr. 2021 à 8 h 15
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: MONSTER1974
I don’t mind the Kulak trade, but I just don’t see MTL & CAR getting together on a deal after the Aho fiasco...


Why? I kinda feel like montreal did them a favor.
27 avr. 2021 à 8 h 29
#9
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 976
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Well i don’t. I watched him play and he was real good for a couple years in New York.


By the looks of it, he was defensively solid in 16/17, and then good offensively in 17/18, but I do wonder if Kreider or Zbad or someone just helped him a lot with their redirections, cause its mostly the net-front shot-map that's driving that offense. And now looking at it - both of them had insanely net-front shooting seasons in 17/18
27 avr. 2021 à 8 h 29
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: MelonVK
By the looks of it, he was defensively solid in 16/17, and then good offensively in 17/18, but I do wonder if Kreider or Zbad or someone just helped him a lot with their redirections, cause its mostly the net-front shot-map that's driving that offense. And now looking at it - both of them had insanely net-front shooting seasons in 17/18


Nah. He played well.
27 avr. 2021 à 8 h 37
#11
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 976
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Nah. He played well.


He was doing a good job of creating offense. Some of that came back to bite him, but it was a general positive impact. I don't disagree. Looking even more into it, it seems I was super correct, but in addition to Kreider and Zibanejad, Zuccarello and Nash also helped. What I was missing though was Shattenkirk trying to drag him under water. Yeah, he had a solid, offensively oriented season.
27 avr. 2021 à 8 h 41
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: MelonVK
He was doing a good job of creating offense. Some of that came back to bite him, but it was a general positive impact. I don't disagree. Looking even more into it, it seems I was super correct, but in addition to Kreider and Zibanejad, Zuccarello and Nash also helped. What I was missing though was Shattenkirk trying to drag him under water. Yeah, he had a solid, offensively oriented season.


He was doing a good job of playing hockey. In all zones. It wasn’t the help of other players. Zero interest in what your numbers tell you happened 5 years ago. I watched. I know.
27 avr. 2021 à 8 h 49
#13
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,612
Mentions "j'aime": 3,458
Quoting: MelonVK
He was doing a good job of creating offense. Some of that came back to bite him, but it was a general positive impact. I don't disagree. Looking even more into it, it seems I was super correct, but in addition to Kreider and Zibanejad, Zuccarello and Nash also helped. What I was missing though was Shattenkirk trying to drag him under water. Yeah, he had a solid, offensively oriented season.


It really depends on his partner on defense. With Pesce, he has been great. Skjei is free to help out offensively knowing that Pesce can cover defensively if need be.
27 avr. 2021 à 8 h 52
#14
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 976
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
He was doing a good job of playing hockey. In all zones. It wasn’t the help of other players. Zero interest in what your numbers tell you happened 5 years ago. I watched. I know.


Everyone who watched is actually correct, which is why everyone who watches the same game agrees on who is good and not. Oh wait...
27 avr. 2021 à 8 h 55
#15
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 976
Quoting: evelutions2
It really depends on his partner on defense. With Pesce, he has been great. Skjei is free to help out offensively knowing that Pesce can cover defensively if need be.


He's had a negative shot impact ever since going to Carolina. Pesce on the other hand has a good offensive shot impact, but hasn't been the same defensively since 18/19. He's still fine, but is currently playing a more offensively oriented game.
27 avr. 2021 à 8 h 56
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: MelonVK
Everyone who watched is actually correct, which is why everyone who watches the same game agrees on who is good and not. Oh wait...


Thats literally the point of the sport
27 avr. 2021 à 8 h 59
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,211
Mentions "j'aime": 2,956
Skjei isnt bad. Rangers' defensive scheme is pretty bad and it made his numbers look worse.

Canes system is better for him. He has a positive xGF/xGA ratio, something he hasnt had in the previous 3 seasons. HD chances for are in the positive, HD goals ratio also above 50%. All of that with him playing on the 2nd pair that gets the majority of the heavy defensive minutes on the team. His O zone starts / FOs are 43 and 45%, respectively, some of the lowest on the team.

Do I wish Skjei would be a little more physical some times or be more consistent with his offense, sure. He is making good sticks that break up offense in the defensive end on a regular basis and skates really well for a big guy. He can carry the puck out of the zone when he feels he has the chance. We can see the dip in the defense with his absence right now.

I get that Skjei isnt a xGF darling or putting the same offense that got him his contract but he is hardly a bad defender. He is about a million overpaid which lowers his value in the flat cap but, still a very solid 2nd pair defender.

Foegele stays over adding Kulak. We could get a 3rd pair LHD pretty easy or go with Sellgren, Honka, or Keane. Unless Hakanpaa doesnt like it here, he probably stays as well. I dont think Debrusk is that guy for us. We could let Seattle take Skjei and then keep Foegele for less cap hit. I dont see the benefit in the Canes making that deal or really any of them.

Gardiner is the guy we need to move. He cant play against top lines. We have the offensive defender to play the heavy offensive leaning minutes in Hamilton. We need a solid minute eater who can handle the defensive zone like Skjei with Pesce.
27 avr. 2021 à 10 h 16
#18
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 8,733
Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
Is the reason for Skjei being so polarizing the fact that he played on New York, that he makes a decent chuck of AAV, that he makes some mistakes, or something else I’m missing?

I feel much better about the Canes defense when Skjei is in there. The Jake Mistakes (Gardiner & Bean) and Joakim Ryan don’t exactly do it for me on the left side behind Slavin right now. Kulak/Gardiner/Vatanen might be the worst 4-6 in the entire league based on this post.

When I watch the games, Skjei stands out to me as a great skating, physical guy who can win board battles and isn’t muscled out of position on defense. He’s one of the better PK’ers I’ve seen too and he can eat 22-25 mins a night. He is turnover prone, but I don’t see a ton of 4/5 defenders in the league who are not. He’s a great fit in Carolina.
27 avr. 2021 à 10 h 16
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 596
Mentions "j'aime": 148
Quoting: MelonVK
Okay, but have you considered that Skjei is pretty bad?


even if he's bad he's still better than any bruins LHD
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage