Point isn’t under 25.
David freaking pastrnak still isn’t there.
Quinn Hughes still doesn’t belong.
Laine is brutal.
Barkov really should be there.

It’s better, but still very very flawed.

Point is 25, so it counts. I hate pastrnak. It’s my team and I will do what I wish with it. Thank you. You also clearly haven’t been watching Hughes play cause he is a Norris caliber dman. Please show me your U25 team and let everyone critique it

If you’re counting Point as U25 (2014 draft) you have to have Pastrnak... no reason for missing him/not including him.

In all honesty, that’s fine. Your opinion. I disagree on both but it’s your opinion. But the whole kinda point of the site is to have conversation and just talk hockey. If you’re gonna make a team of guys “you like” then put it in the description so people don’t waste their time trying to argue why certain players are missing/not missing.

Ah. See your last team said, “Best U25 team.” I might make one. It will beat yours by six goals.

Point is not eligible. U25 stands for UNDER-25. 25 is. Not under 25 is it? Point would qualify for a 25 and under team, but not an under 25 team.

Since this said version 2, i assumed this was an extension of your first team, which was labeled, “best.” If you were just trying to make a fun under 25 team that you like, you did a fine job other than breaking your own rules with point. If your intention was to make the best U25 team, you did a poor job.