SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bruins all-draft team

Créé par: Xolie
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 23 avr. 2021
Publié: 23 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Every player is still in the NHL this season . This is not meant to be realistic.
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
30999 000 000 $103 055 652 $964 222 $1 145 000 $895 944 348 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 850 000 $9 850 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
6 800 000 $6 800 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance100 000 $$100K)
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 avr. 2021 à 14 h 40
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
The only ex bruin that really irks me is Lindgren. There was just no need to move him in that garbage deal.
Xolie a aimé ceci.
23 avr. 2021 à 14 h 41
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 390
Mentions "j'aime": 60
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
The only ex bruin that really irks me is Lindgren. There was just no need to move him in that garbage deal.


Ikr like why would we need to move him
23 avr. 2021 à 14 h 52
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
The only ex bruin that really irks me is Lindgren. There was just no need to move him in that garbage deal.


Bruins took massive Ls on the Hamilton and Seguin trades as well...
Xolie a aimé ceci.
23 avr. 2021 à 14 h 58
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 390
Mentions "j'aime": 60
Quoting: mhockey91
Bruins took massive Ls on the Hamilton and Seguin trades as well...


Yeah didn't we trade Hamilton for the picks that would end up being Senyshyn and zboril?
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
23 avr. 2021 à 15 h 1
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: mhockey91
Bruins took massive Ls on the Hamilton and Seguin trades as well...


I don’t miss those players at all though. Seguin legit had to be moved, and I’m very happy the bruins don’t have Hamilton anymore.

PS: as a society we need to add “taking Ls,” to the list of garbage millennial/gen Z terms to banish forever.
23 avr. 2021 à 15 h 3
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Xolie
Yeah didn't we trade Hamilton for the picks that would end up being Senyshyn and zboril?


It was a bad value trade, but thank god that guys gone. But no, zboril was taken with a pick from the lucic trade. Hamilton got a first and two seconds. I believe JFK and lauzon. Sweeney was not a good GM in 2015 (though the lucic trade was robbery)
23 avr. 2021 à 15 h 18
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
It was a bad value trade, but thank god that guys gone. But no, zboril was taken with a pick from the lucic trade. Hamilton got a first and two seconds. I believe JFK and lauzon. Sweeney was not a good GM in 2015 (though the lucic trade was robbery)


The Boychuk deal stands out too as a positive. End up getting Carlo and Lindgren with picks received.
23 avr. 2021 à 15 h 20
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
Quoting: Xolie
Ikr like why would we need to move him


Had Zboril/Lauzon ahead of him on the depth chart at the time. Got rid of Beleskey/Spooner. Part of the business. Lindgren is a solid player that developed well, in retrospect Zboril probably wouldve been the guy they'd rather have moved but thats the way it goes.
23 avr. 2021 à 15 h 27
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Heyhowareya37
The Boychuk deal stands out too as a positive. End up getting Carlo and Lindgren with picks received.


There’s a lot of things chiarelli did that are still looking pretty good.
Heyhowareya37 a aimé ceci.
23 avr. 2021 à 15 h 35
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Heyhowareya37
Had Zboril/Lauzon ahead of him on the depth chart at the time. Got rid of Beleskey/Spooner. Part of the business. Lindgren is a solid player that developed well, in retrospect Zboril probably wouldve been the guy they'd rather have moved but thats the way it goes.


Didn’t get rid of beleskey. Got rid of $1M out of $3.8M of beleskey. It was a horrible horrible horrible trade. Don’t try to justify it. One of Sweeney’s many horrific moves.
23 avr. 2021 à 15 h 54
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
Modifié 23 avr. 2021 à 16 h 2
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Didn’t get rid of beleskey. Got rid of $1M out of $3.8M of beleskey. It was a horrible horrible horrible trade. Don’t try to justify it. One of Sweeney’s many horrific moves.


im not justifying it... it obviously didnt work out with Nash. Im saying why Lindgren was involved. We cant just go back in time after the fact. At the time Zboril and Lauzon were also LHD, and the position at the NHL level was pretty full with Chara, Krug Grzelcyk going up and down. It was a surplus position at the time, and he was the one made expendable/or NYR targeted. Not saying it worked out, but you guys are saying "Why was Lindgren involved". Hindsight is 20/20.
23 avr. 2021 à 16 h 1
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Heyhowareya37
im not justifying it... it obviously didnt work out with Nash. Im saying why Lindgren was involved. We cant just go back in time after the fact. At the time Zboril and Lauzon were also LHD, and the position at the NHL level was pretty full with Chara, Krug Grzelcyk going up and down. It was a surplus position at the time, and he was the one made expendable/or NYR targeted.


Lindgren was involved because Sweeney was a rookie GM and was really bad at his job.
23 avr. 2021 à 17 h 13
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Lindgren was involved because Sweeney was a rookie GM and was really bad at his job.


Ok... I just don’t look at it that way. I just think it’s a lot easier to say 6 years later he shouldn’t involved Lindgren. He was a mid level prospect at the time. NYR developed him well and gave him an opportunity to play the last couple years. I’m sure everyone would’ve loved it at the time if he said he didn’t make the trade for Nash b/c he didn’t want to lose Lindgren
23 avr. 2021 à 17 h 21
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Heyhowareya37
Ok... I just don’t look at it that way. I just think it’s a lot easier to say 6 years later he shouldn’t involved Lindgren. He was a mid level prospect at the time. NYR developed him well and gave him an opportunity to play the last couple years. I’m sure everyone would’ve loved it at the time if he said he didn’t make the trade for Nash b/c he didn’t want to lose Lindgren


Well, i said it the second it happened. If I recall, we had just gotten to see him play in the world juniors, and he looked really good. Rick Nash was clearly on his last legs. When i heard it was for a first round pick and 50% retained beleskey, i expected it to stop there. Value wise, the trade was laughably bad the second the call went through. Honestly, i kind of expected Sweeney to be canned in the off season because of it. Still quasi-wish he was. He had a perfect deadline this year though.
23 avr. 2021 à 17 h 22
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
I don’t miss those players at all though. Seguin legit had to be moved, and I’m very happy the bruins don’t have Hamilton anymore.

PS: as a society we need to add “taking Ls,” to the list of garbage millennial/gen Z terms to banish forever.


Seguin may not be a star now, but he was excellent for years before injuries. Hamilton would arguably be your best D. Both trades were bad
23 avr. 2021 à 17 h 22
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: Xolie
Yeah didn't we trade Hamilton for the picks that would end up being Senyshyn and zboril?


I believe it was a first and second
23 avr. 2021 à 17 h 25
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: mhockey91
Seguin may not be a star now, but he was excellent for years before injuries. Hamilton would arguably be your best D. Both trades were bad


Hamilton suuuuuuuucks. Mcavoy is about 100x the player he could ever be. Seguin HAD to be traded. It’s a real bummer that it had to be that way. I would have liked it if he was able to stick around. Value wise the bruins lost both trades. Severely. I’m happy both players aren’t on the bruins.
23 avr. 2021 à 17 h 37
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Well, i said it the second it happened. If I recall, we had just gotten to see him play in the world juniors, and he looked really good. Rick Nash was clearly on his last legs. When i heard it was for a first round pick and 50% retained beleskey, i expected it to stop there. Value wise, the trade was laughably bad the second the call went through. Honestly, i kind of expected Sweeney to be canned in the off season because of it. Still quasi-wish he was. He had a perfect deadline this year though.


Thats fair if you were high on him from the get-go. I liked his game as well, i just think a lot of guys looked at Lindgren as a 4/5 PKer and saw more upside in Zboril. He bet on his team, Nash didnt work out. I think we're more on the same page then it seems. Probably a little overpay at the time, definitely an overpay in retrospect. The thing that stinks the most is that everyone at the time who knew Lindgren all knew his style fit perfect in BOS.
23 avr. 2021 à 17 h 38
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Heyhowareya37
Thats fair if you were high on him from the get-go. I liked his game as well, i just think a lot of guys looked at Lindgren as a 4/5 PKer and saw more upside in Zboril. He bet on his team, Nash didnt work out. I think we're more on the same page then it seems. Probably a little overpay at the time, definitely an overpay in retrospect. The thing that stinks the most is that everyone at the time who knew Lindgren all knew his style fit perfect in BOS.


Well ya, but anyone that thought Nash was going to work out was a moron.
Anyone that thought paying to get rid of a whopping $1M of beleskey was a good idea was a moron.

Apparently Sweeney managed to go 2-for-2 there.
23 avr. 2021 à 18 h 29
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 1,047
Mentions "j'aime": 325
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Didn’t get rid of beleskey. Got rid of $1M out of $3.8M of beleskey. It was a horrible horrible horrible trade. Don’t try to justify it. One of Sweeney’s many horrific moves.


In 2015 Sweeney signs Beleskey 5 years 3.8M. In 2016 he outdoes himself signing Backes 5 years 6M. He makes the terrible trade in 2018 with New York and the terrible 2020 trade with Anaheim in part because he did not have a clue what he was doing in free agency. If he just signs the right players or at the least does nothing history changes. Instead we lose 2 firsts and Lindgren and to add insult to injury Nash and Kase do almost nothing in the playoffs, Nash immediately retires and Kase might have to as well. The 2015 draft? Its a miracle this team is at where its at but the day of reckoning is coming soon.
23 avr. 2021 à 18 h 41
#21
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: BruinsCharlies
In 2015 Sweeney signs Beleskey 5 years 3.8M. In 2016 he outdoes himself signing Backes 5 years 6M. He makes the terrible trade in 2018 with New York and the terrible 2020 trade with Anaheim in part because he did not have a clue what he was doing in free agency. If he just signs the right players or at the least does nothing history changes. Instead we lose 2 firsts and Lindgren and to add insult to injury Nash and Kase do almost nothing in the playoffs, Nash immediately retires and Kase might have to as well. The 2015 draft? Its a miracle this team is at where its at but the day of reckoning is coming soon.


Well, a lot of that is because chiarelli set this team up pretty well. Got the Bergeron contract done, drafted marchand (no i don’t care to hear anything about interim GM Jeff freaking gorton) and Pastrnak, traded for and signed tuukka. Prior tot he deadline, Sweeney had two big hits. Carlo and mcavoy. They were really big hits, but he’s had a ton of misses.
23 avr. 2021 à 18 h 52
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Hamilton suuuuuuuucks. Mcavoy is about 100x the player he could ever be. Seguin HAD to be traded. It’s a real bummer that it had to be that way. I would have liked it if he was able to stick around. Value wise the bruins lost both trades. Severely. I’m happy both players aren’t on the bruins.


You can make an argument for either player, but to say Mcavoy is 100X better is such a hometown bias. Then again, based on your comments, that doesn’t surprise me one bit...
23 avr. 2021 à 18 h 54
#23
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: mhockey91
You can make an argument for either player, but to say Mcavoy is 100X better is such a hometown bias. Then again, based on your comments, that doesn’t surprise me one bit...


I thought Hamilton sucked before mcavoy entered the league. The guys soft. Watch the guy in the playoffs. You can’t make an argument for him.
23 avr. 2021 à 18 h 57
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
I thought Hamilton sucked before mcavoy entered the league. The guys soft. Watch the guy in the playoffs. You can’t make an argument for him.


Hamilton is a great player who puts up big numbers and isn’t no slouch defensively either. Your “soft” take is lazy at best
23 avr. 2021 à 19 h 17
#25
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: mhockey91
Hamilton is a great player who puts up big numbers and isn’t no slouch defensively either. Your “soft” take is lazy at best


Watch where teams dump the puck in the playoffs. Always Hamilton’s corner. Over and over again. Watch what line they throw out when he’s out there. Scoring line. They’re licking their chops. And guess what happens to the canes? They get smoked.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage