SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Playoffs lines today

Créé par: CLR
Équipe: 2020-21 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 22 avr. 2021
Publié: 22 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Anderson scores no matter the linemates. He sticks with danault and Tatar to get Gallagher helping on another line.
I like the 2nd line. Good combo of shooter-playmaker-forecheker.
On the 3rd line, I think Kk needs speed like we saw yesterday with Byron and lehkonen in his wings to get open.
I would start Evans et lehkonen instead of Staal and Drouin but we know it won’t happen.
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de WSH
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
Logo de VGK
Logo de PHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $77 431 309 $0 $3 137 500 $4 068 691 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 625 000 $1 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 avr. 2021 à 10 h 42
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,792
Mentions "j'aime": 481
I'm ok with your lines. I'd possibly switch Anderson and Gally.

I know it's just one game but I haven't been impressed by Merrill. If he doesn't show anything more, I'd prefer to suit Kulak.
CLR a aimé ceci.
22 avr. 2021 à 10 h 46
#2
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Quoting: Taz
I'm ok with your lines. I'd possibly switch Anderson and Gally.

I know it's just one game but I haven't been impressed by Merrill. If he doesn't show anything more, I'd prefer to suit Kulak.


What did you expect with Merrill? He’s a defensive defenseman. He was good last night in the fact that his night was quiet, and it’s not like Kulak has proved to be any better (especially on the right side).
CLR a aimé ceci.
22 avr. 2021 à 10 h 59
#3
Démarrer sujet
Best gm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 997
Mentions "j'aime": 303
Quoting: Taz
I'm ok with your lines. I'd possibly switch Anderson and Gally.

I know it's just one game but I haven't been impressed by Merrill. If he doesn't show anything more, I'd prefer to suit Kulak.


Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
What did you expect with Merrill? He’s a defensive defenseman. He was good last night in the fact that his night was quiet, and it’s not like Kulak has proved to be any better (especially on the right side).


Exactly, kulak said he can’t play RD. eddy, chariot and Romanov are better so no spot for him now. The last spot is Rd and merill is probably better suited
YTSnipeCity a aimé ceci.
22 avr. 2021 à 11 h 3
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,792
Mentions "j'aime": 481
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
What did you expect with Merrill? He’s a defensive defenseman. He was good last night in the fact that his night was quiet, and it’s not like Kulak has proved to be any better (especially on the right side).


Yesterday's game was a playoff one, very intense, physical. As for Merrill I don't remember him serving a good solid hit, blocking shot or showing character. You're right, he hasn't been bad defensively, but he wasn't good on relance/zone exits. I remember one or two situations where he could support the offense in the offensive zone and he seemed really hesitant. As I just say, 11min30 is a very poor sample, hope to see him more physical and confidEnt.

I do prefer Kulak's mobility and relance. Kulak had good games playing with Romanov on 3rd pair. His bad games were when he played with Weber against better players, and Weber also struggled a lot and committed a lot of turnovers!
22 avr. 2021 à 11 h 3
#5
Snipe City
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 376
Mentions "j'aime": 68
Quoting: Taz
I'm ok with your lines. I'd possibly switch Anderson and Gally.

I know it's just one game but I haven't been impressed by Merrill. If he doesn't show anything more, I'd prefer to suit Kulak.


Ur so wrong lol, Merill played good.
22 avr. 2021 à 11 h 6
#6
Snipe City
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 376
Mentions "j'aime": 68
Quoting: Taz
Yesterday's game was a playoff one, very intense, physical. As for Merrill I don't remember him serving a good solid hit, blocking shot or showing character. Your right, he hasn't been bad defensively, but he wasn't good on relance/zone exits. I remember one or two situations where he could support the offence in the offensive zone and he seemed really hesitant. As I just say, 11min30 is a very poor sample, hope to see him more physical and confidEnt.

I do prefer Kulak's mobility and relance. Kulak had good games playing with Romanov on 3rd pair. His bad games were when he played with Weber against better players, and Weber also struggled a lot and committed a lot of turnovers!


Kulak does deliver more mobility and puck moving, but pairing him with Romanov who is also a more offensive defensemen isn't always the solution. If you noticed, Merill was able to take more of the heat defensively while Romanov was more free to move up with the puck, get in deep and make more pinches, something people were complaining he wasn't doing enough of before. By Merill being that defensive defensemen, it gave Romanov the opportunity to move up the ice and get himself that secondary assist. While im not saying Merill is the better defensemen, i feel like he is a better partner than Kulak was to Romanov
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage