SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

I still have a lot of questions

Créé par: Bsikora780
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 20 avr. 2021
Publié: 20 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3875 000 $
3875 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
22 500 000 $
21 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 400 000 $
12 225 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
Détails additionnels:
2022 pick is conditional
WPG
  1. Nylander, Alexander [Droits de RFA]
  2. Zadorov, Nikita [Droits de RFA]
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Kämpf, David [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
anywhere
3.
CHI
    Seattle Expansion
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de FLA
    2022
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2023
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2081 500 000 $44 107 676 $452 439 $4 532 500 $37 392 324 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    875 000 $875 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    875 000 $875 000 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    AG, C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    2 225 000 $2 225 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    912 500 $912 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    853 333 $853 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    20 avr. 2021 à 13 h 13
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 19,028
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,322
    I wouldn't sell low on Nylander right now as his value is probably at a all-time low, so no reason not to give him another small deal and see if he can blossom.

    Kampf is really valuable defensively and being a tough board battle player on the 4th line. Carps is going on 31 wheras Kampf is 26. Moving Kampf is fine but we have to have a young guy that can replace him. Maybe Entwistle or Gaudette? I'm not sure
    20 avr. 2021 à 21 h 21
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    HawksDynasty
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 263
    Mentions "j'aime": 29
    Quoting: ChiHawk
    I wouldn't sell low on Nylander right now as his value is probably at a all-time low, so no reason not to give him another small deal and see if he can blossom.

    Kampf is really valuable defensively and being a tough board battle player on the 4th line. Carps is going on 31 wheras Kampf is 26. Moving Kampf is fine but we have to have a young guy that can replace him. Maybe Entwistle or Gaudette? I'm not sure


    Im think Borgstrom possibly...
    20 avr. 2021 à 21 h 23
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 19,028
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,322
    Quoting: Bsikora780
    Im think Borgstrom possibly...


    I'm not all that familiar with Borgstrom anymore since he was drafted. Is he a top 9 player or a 4th liner?
    20 avr. 2021 à 21 h 54
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    HawksDynasty
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 263
    Mentions "j'aime": 29
    Quoting: ChiHawk
    I'm not all that familiar with Borgstrom anymore since he was drafted. Is he a top 9 player or a 4th liner?


    I think he's a top 9 for sure. I'm not to sure weather he is a center or winger. It like with Adam Gaudette he has some skills that will transfer to being a good NHL player as a fringe top 6 forward. The Canucks stunk and it seemed like nothing worked in Vancouver. He is a top 6 forward if used correctly. Hagel and Reichel are guys IDK where to place. Hagel works hard but isn't gonna put the puck in the net consistently but he's able to drive to the net and create scoring chances. Riechel isnt a 4th liner because he can put the puck in the net and Hagel can drive offense better in a bottom 6 role verse playing with Patrick Kane or Kirby Dach. Hagel could play on the PP and PK and use him on the PP like Andrew Shaw as a high screen and Dach as the main guy in front.
    21 avr. 2021 à 0 h 49
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 19,028
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,322
    Quoting: Bsikora780
    I think he's a top 9 for sure. I'm not to sure weather he is a center or winger. It like with Adam Gaudette he has some skills that will transfer to being a good NHL player as a fringe top 6 forward. The Canucks stunk and it seemed like nothing worked in Vancouver. He is a top 6 forward if used correctly. Hagel and Reichel are guys IDK where to place. Hagel works hard but isn't gonna put the puck in the net consistently but he's able to drive to the net and create scoring chances. Riechel isnt a 4th liner because he can put the puck in the net and Hagel can drive offense better in a bottom 6 role verse playing with Patrick Kane or Kirby Dach. Hagel could play on the PP and PK and use him on the PP like Andrew Shaw as a high screen and Dach as the main guy in front.


    Reichel IMO has the most upside and is a top 6 guy IMO. Gaudette, Borgstrom and Hagel are bottom 9 players IMO. Nylander if he can figure it out is a top 6 player. All my opinions, but I just don't see anyone that truly is a top 6 besides Reichel and potentially Nylander. That is fine if we have Kane, Debrincat, Dach, Strome, Kubalik and Toews if he returns. Reichel and Nylander will have to earn their time. I just don't see Gaudette, Hagel or Borgstrom leapfrogging those guys. Reichel could be our new Saad type of player which we really need.
    21 avr. 2021 à 10 h 54
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    HawksDynasty
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 263
    Mentions "j'aime": 29
    Quoting: ChiHawk
    Reichel IMO has the most upside and is a top 6 guy IMO. Gaudette, Borgstrom and Hagel are bottom 9 players IMO. Nylander if he can figure it out is a top 6 player. All my opinions, but I just don't see anyone that truly is a top 6 besides Reichel and potentially Nylander. That is fine if we have Kane, Debrincat, Dach, Strome, Kubalik and Toews if he returns. Reichel and Nylander will have to earn their time. I just don't see Gaudette, Hagel or Borgstrom leapfrogging those guys. Reichel could be our new Saad type of player which we really need.


    I said Gaudette is a fringe top 6 forward. If he is used right he could work in the top 6.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage