SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If positional need is the top priority for Ottawa in the offseason

Créé par: sensonfire
Équipe: 2021-22 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 19 avr. 2021
Publié: 19 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
My views on drafting Luke Hughes and him becoming Quinn Hughes 2.0 are well documented and have been critiqued ad nauseam.



I can not emphasize this enough:

Position should matter little when it comes to drafting, even if you have 20 left-handed defensemen.

If the best player available is a left-handed defenseman, you either pick him or trade the pick.

No ifs, ands or buts about it.


This is my criteria for drafting in order of importance:

1. Best Player Available (BPA)

2. Safest Player Available (SPA) or the player that is least likely to turn into a bust.

3. If there is still no clear cut favourite on the BPA or SPA, then you draft by position.


If you only draft based on positional needs, then you'll be missing out on some really good players.

Guaranteed :)


Aside from that, I decided to make a post on a plan for the offseason that places a greater emphasis on positional need, particularly when it comes to drafting.

Because I'm nice ;)

Down below, you'll see my personal list of the top draft-eligible prospects that best address Ottawa's positional needs IMO.

Notice that Luke Hughes isn't on it :D

Let me know what you think of all this and I'll see you in the comments :)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
88 000 000 $
24 800 000 $
33 150 000 $
3925 000 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
    Somewhere for picks.
    2.
    OTT
      Here are the most pressing positional needs Ottawa should address at the right opportunity.

      1. A #1 centreman if Stutzle is better suited at LW

      2. A 2nd line RW that shoots right and is either a powerful forward or can score goals in bunches.

      3. A top 4 RD that shoots right and can play well in a pairing with Chabot if neither Lassi Thomson nor JBD are the answer.
      CGY
        Top targets for Ottawa in the 1st round ranked in order of importance if addressing positional need is the main objective:

        1. Matthew Beniers (C) University of Michigan

        2. William Eklund (C) Djurgardens

        3. Dylan Guenther (RW) Edmonton Oil Kings

        4. Brandt Clarke (RD) HC Nove Zamky/Barrie Colts

        5. Kent Johnson (C) University of Michigan

        6. Fabian Lysell (RW) Lulea

        7. Aatu Raty (C) Karpat
        Rachats de contrats
        Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
        2021
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de SJS
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        2022
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de TBL
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de BOS
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de NYI
        Logo de SJS
        2023
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de NSH
        TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
        2181 500 000 $61 585 083 $0 $4 932 500 $19 914 917 $
        Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
        AG
        UFA - 7
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
        C
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
        AD, AG
        UFA - 6
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
        AD, AG
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
        C
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
        AD, AG
        M-NTC
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
        AG
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
        C
        RFA - 2
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        749 250 $749 250 $
        C, AG
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
        C, AD
        UFA - 4
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
        AD, AG
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
        AG, AD, C
        UFA - 1
        Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
        DG
        UFA - 7
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
        DD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 3
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
        G
        M-NTC
        UFA - 3
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
        DG/DD, AG
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
        DD
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        925 000 $925 000 $
        G
        RFA - 3
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
        DD
        RFA - 2
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        925 000 $925 000 $
        G
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        750 000 $750 000 $
        DG/DD
        UFA - 1

        Code d'intégration

        • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
        • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

        Texte intégré

        Cliquer pour surligner
        19 avr. 2021 à 16 h 13
        #1
        KFTW
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juill. 2018
        Messages: 42,642
        Mentions "j'aime": 23,798
        It seems like you’re putting a lot of emphasis on his last name when picks 1-8 are a lot closer than ppl think. This is the year when you can take anyone in the top 8
        sensonfire, Alfie11 et Borocop a aimé ceci.
        19 avr. 2021 à 16 h 15
        #2
        KFTW
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juill. 2018
        Messages: 42,642
        Mentions "j'aime": 23,798
        Also you’re spot on with your list and positional needs
        sensonfire et Borocop a aimé ceci.
        19 avr. 2021 à 16 h 19
        #3
        Banni
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: avr. 2021
        Messages: 14,017
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
        Is Quinn Hughes 2.0 a compliment or an insult?
        19 avr. 2021 à 16 h 24
        #4
        Démarrer sujet
        sensonfire
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: févr. 2021
        Messages: 11,768
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,438
        Quoting: CMcAvoy73
        Is Quinn Hughes 2.0 a compliment or an insult?


        How could it possibly be an insult?
        Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
        19 avr. 2021 à 16 h 26
        #5
        KFTW
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juill. 2018
        Messages: 42,642
        Mentions "j'aime": 23,798
        Quoting: CMcAvoy73
        Is Quinn Hughes 2.0 a compliment or an insult?


        I think Luke is more like Chabot than Quinn
        sensonfire a aimé ceci.
        19 avr. 2021 à 16 h 30
        #6
        Banni
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: avr. 2021
        Messages: 14,017
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
        Quoting: sensonfire
        How could it possibly be an insult?


        Because Hughes is a one dimensional specialist that is one of the easiest guys in the NHL to play against.
        sensonfire a aimé ceci.
        19 avr. 2021 à 16 h 31
        #7
        Démarrer sujet
        sensonfire
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: févr. 2021
        Messages: 11,768
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,438
        Quoting: CMcAvoy73
        Because Hughes is a one dimensional specialist that is one of the easiest guys in the NHL to play against.


        I meant it as a compliment then.
        19 avr. 2021 à 16 h 32
        #8
        Banni
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: avr. 2021
        Messages: 14,017
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
        Quoting: sensonfire
        I meant it as a complement then.


        If he’s Quinn Hughes 2.0, i wouldn’t touch him in the first round to be honest. It’s easy to find guys that do 80% of what Quinn Hughes does for 20% of the cost.
        sensonfire a aimé ceci.
        19 avr. 2021 à 17 h 36
        #9
        Sens Sicko from '06
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: avr. 2021
        Messages: 519
        Mentions "j'aime": 279
        Quoting: csick
        Also you’re spot on with your list and positional needs


        I totally agree. You're also way more realistic with your extensions to Tkachuk, Batherson, and Zub than most people are. I do think Dzingel doesn't get that much. He'll be playing 3rd-4th line.
        csick et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
        19 avr. 2021 à 18 h 26
        #10
        Au-revoir Dorion
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: mai 2019
        Messages: 4,519
        Mentions "j'aime": 2,980
        i think luke Hughes is way more well rounded than quinn hughes
        sensonfire a aimé ceci.
         
        Répondre
        To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
        Question:
        Options:
        Ajouter une option
        Soumettre le sondage