SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

STL Blues 2021-22 BB

Créé par: PuckShmuck87
Équipe: 2021-22 Blues de St-Louis
Date de création initiale: 17 avr. 2021
Publié: 18 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
41 750 000 $
21 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 750 000 $
44 750 000 $
42 500 000 $
22 750 000 $
41 250 000 $
Transactions
STL
  1. Peeke, Andrew [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Dunn, Vince [Droits de RFA]
  2. Sanford, Zachary [Droits de RFA]
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de STL
Logo de CBJ
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de DET
2022
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
2023
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $71 456 349 $306 349 $0 $10 043 651 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 2
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
3 275 000 $3 275 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance1 300 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
787 500 $787 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 avr. 2021 à 2 h 25
#1
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 4,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
if cbj is giving up a top 7 pick and peeke... we are getting someone better than Dunn back.
18 avr. 2021 à 5 h 31
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,355
Mentions "j'aime": 851
That is ridiculous. Dunn is not worth a top 10 pick let alone in my opinion a younger and possibly higher upside defenseman in Peeke. I would suggest if you are looking to acquire our top 10 pick Brayden Schenn needs to be on the table or Robert Thomas plus a blue chip prospect. I say this about the latter because you have to consider not just the selection spot but the money and team control of said selection would give St Louis.
18 avr. 2021 à 9 h 17
#3
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,055
Mentions "j'aime": 11,254
Quoting: Jacketsman61
... let alone in my opinion a younger and possibly higher upside defenseman in Peeke...



Whoa nelly. Reel it in there. Nobody thinks that.
18 avr. 2021 à 12 h 1
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,355
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: mokumboi
Whoa nelly. Reel it in there. Nobody thinks that.


Peeke hasn’t had consistent time up with the big club to develop properly. With Savard moved on, Peeke will get more minutes and an increased role. And yes, he does have potential for a higher upside.
18 avr. 2021 à 12 h 35
#5
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,055
Mentions "j'aime": 11,254
Quoting: Jacketsman61
Peeke hasn’t had consistent time up with the big club to develop properly. With Savard moved on, Peeke will get more minutes and an increased role. And yes, he does have potential for a higher upside.



Dude, he's already 23. Literally no scouting experts/services think he has as much upside as Dunn, who had already had an outstanding two-way rookie season and helped win a Cup by that age.
PuckShmuck87 a aimé ceci.
18 avr. 2021 à 12 h 38
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,355
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Torts has stifled his growth because of his line blending and inability to get him consistent ice time.
18 avr. 2021 à 23 h 52
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 100
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: mokumboi
Dude, he's already 23. Literally no scouting experts/services think he has as much upside as Dunn, who had already had an outstanding two-way rookie season and helped win a Cup by that age.


Yeah already 23 might as well file for social security he’s so old lol. Your not selling anyone with that logic. Prime years for an adult male are somewhere between 26 and 30. Also defensemen take longer to develop than forwards and Peeke still plays with boy strength not man strength which he will have in a couple years and make a big difference, he’s not a warrior yet. 23 is not the same as it was 15 years ago. Young men in general are taking even longer to mature just from a mental standpoint nowadays. No one can claim they know the ceiling of Peeke right now because these weird covid times have adversely affected youth development across the league in a huge way with no offseason stuff. I consider most young players to be almost a year behind where they otherwise would be. GM’s understand these circumstances, so without a full normal season plus offseason with Peeke given a fair chance, no way Jackets are ready to let him go. Not to mention the departure of Savard.
19 avr. 2021 à 2 h 51
#8
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,055
Mentions "j'aime": 11,254
Quoting: PuckYourself
Yeah already 23 might as well file for social security he’s so old lol. Your not selling anyone with that logic. Prime years for an adult male are somewhere between 26 and 30. Also defensemen take longer to develop than forwards and Peeke still plays with boy strength not man strength which he will have in a couple years and make a big difference, he’s not a warrior yet. 23 is not the same as it was 15 years ago. Young men in general are taking even longer to mature just from a mental standpoint nowadays. No one can claim they know the ceiling of Peeke right now because these weird covid times have adversely affected youth development across the league in a huge way with no offseason stuff. I consider most young players to be almost a year behind where they otherwise would be. GM’s understand these circumstances, so without a full normal season plus offseason with Peeke given a fair chance, no way Jackets are ready to let him go. Not to mention the departure of Savard.


Oi vey...
PuckShmuck87 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage