SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Easy

Créé par: Imagine875948
Équipe: 2021-22 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 16 avr. 2021
Publié: 16 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
1980 000 $
2925 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
22 775 000 $
21 225 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
VAN
  1. Riikola, Juuso
Détails additionnels:
Nhl draft
2.
PIT
    Seattle
    ANA
    1. Aston-Reese, Zach [Droits de RFA]
    3.
    PIT
    1. Wood, Miles
    2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (NJD)
    NJD
    1. Björkqvist, Kasper
    2. Pettersson, Marcus
    3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
    Détails additionnels:
    NHL draft
    4.
    PIT
    1. Virtanen, Jake
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
    3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
    VAN
    1. Zucker, Jason
    Détails additionnels:
    2021 offseason
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de ANA
    2022
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    2023
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $79 418 031 $0 $0 $2 081 969 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    2 636 364 $2 636 364 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    2 775 000 $2 775 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    800 000 $800 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    C, AG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    980 000 $980 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    16 avr. 2021 à 9 h 4
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 39,600
    Mentions "j'aime": 18,153
    NJD just added Siegnethaler at deadline, so would probably be out on Pettersson.
    Imagine875948 a aimé ceci.
    16 avr. 2021 à 9 h 6
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Pens are the best
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 5,390
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,691
    Quoting: NHLfan10506
    NJD just added Siegnethaler at deadline, so would probably be out on Pettersson.


    Sieganthale is a depth guy imo
    16 avr. 2021 à 9 h 11
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2018
    Messages: 2,635
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,167
    Easy decline on the virtanen trade.Jake still has a good up side,Zucker is 29 his play is in decline and he has a bad contract.in my opinion.
    16 avr. 2021 à 9 h 20
    #4
    Speak of the Devil
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 23,925
    Mentions "j'aime": 26,426
    Devils decline
    16 avr. 2021 à 9 h 35
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 39,600
    Mentions "j'aime": 18,153
    Quoting: Imagine875948
    Sieganthale is a depth guy imo


    More than a depth guy.
    He is young LHD that probably becomes a staple on third pair and on PK.
    Basically same role as Pettersson would have played.
    Just came cheaper.
    16 avr. 2021 à 9 h 40
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 7,870
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,382
    I'm not interested in trading a 2nd for Zucker
    16 avr. 2021 à 10 h 20
    #7
    Chiggy
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 1,796
    Mentions "j'aime": 590
    Quoting: remowilliams
    Easy decline on the virtanen trade.Jake still has a good up side,Zucker is 29 his play is in decline and he has a bad contract.in my opinion.


    Agreed that Zucker has a bad contract but Virtanen is almost certainly getting bought out this summer.
    remowilliams a aimé ceci.
    16 avr. 2021 à 10 h 20
    #8
    Chiggy
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 1,796
    Mentions "j'aime": 590
    Quoting: remowilliams
    Easy decline on the virtanen trade.Jake still has a good up side,Zucker is 29 his play is in decline and he has a bad contract.in my opinion.


    Agreed that Zucker has a bad contract but Virtanen is almost certainly getting bought out this summer.
    remowilliams a aimé ceci.
    16 avr. 2021 à 10 h 21
    #9
    Chiggy
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 1,796
    Mentions "j'aime": 590
    Wouldn't want Virtanen, who is quite bad. There are probably better ways to get rid of Zucker.
    remowilliams a aimé ceci.
    16 avr. 2021 à 11 h 3
    #10
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 19,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
    Quoting: remowilliams
    Easy decline on the virtanen trade.Jake still has a good up side,Zucker is 29 his play is in decline and he has a bad contract.in my opinion.


    he has 6 5v5 goals in 25 games. Putting him on pace for his career highs of 20 in an 82 game season......"in decline"

    You don't watch the games, you don't know anything about the player, and you are opining.

    His game has been everything advertised for the penguins. He's not the issue on the team. Just because his total stats are down doesn't mean he's not playing well. It means he's not one of the main pieces on a power play anymore.

    His 5v5 stats are right where they should be.
    16 avr. 2021 à 11 h 39
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2018
    Messages: 2,635
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,167
    Quoting: pharrow
    he has 6 5v5 goals in 25 games. Putting him on pace for his career highs of 20 in an 82 game season......"in decline"

    You don't watch the games, you don't know anything about the player, and you are opining.

    His game has been everything advertised for the penguins. He's not the issue on the team. Just because his total stats are down doesn't mean he's not playing well. It means he's not one of the main pieces on a power play anymore.

    His 5v5 stats are right where they should be.


    he is in decline look at his stats his last good yr was three years ago. hes 29 on a high paying contract. Not sure if you watch canucks games but we have our own BAD contracts and declining players. we are trying to get younger were moving in a different direction. not a good fit In my opinion.
    16 avr. 2021 à 11 h 59
    #12
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 19,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
    Quoting: remowilliams
    he is in decline look at his stats his last good yr was three years ago. hes 29 on a high paying contract. Not sure if you watch canucks games but we have our own BAD contracts and declining players. we are trying to get younger were moving in a different direction. not a good fit In my opinion.


    what part of his 5v5 goals and play.....which is the one place you can look at to see if a player is declining because it's not hidden through things like PP advantage.....are on pace for his career highs.

    How exactly to you plan to explain that for a "declining player."
    You're argument has 0 logic in it. He's not in decline. His play is as good as it has ever been.
    But you don't actually watch the games. You form opinions by listening to other bad opinions of people who don't know jack crap about players on capfriendly.
    Maybe watch him play, go look at the stats where they count, and use some logic.
    Players don't go on pace for career highs in 5v5 play if they are "declining"
    Usually the 5v5 play is the first place you look to see if a player is declining. As that is where the numbers would show it first. Anyone can pad stats on a power play. It's not hard when you have a man advantage.
    16 avr. 2021 à 12 h 5
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2018
    Messages: 2,635
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,167
    Quoting: pharrow
    what part of his 5v5 goals and play.....which is the one place you can look at to see if a player is declining because it's not hidden through things like PP advantage.....are on pace for his career highs.

    How exactly to you plan to explain that for a "declining player."
    You're argument has 0 logic in it. He's not in decline. His play is as good as it has ever been.
    But you don't actually watch the games. You form opinions by listening to other bad opinions of people who don't know jack crap about players on capfriendly.
    Maybe watch him play, go look at the stats where they count, and use some logic.
    Players don't go on pace for career highs in 5v5 play if they are "declining"
    Usually the 5v5 play is the first place you look to see if a player is declining. As that is where the numbers would show it first. Anyone can pad stats on a power play. It's not hard when you have a man advantage.


    You are ASSUMING alot of things you have no idea who i am or what i know.IN MY OPINION HE IS NOT A FIT FOR OUR TEAM.thats my logic. This site is based on opinions that is mine TAKE IT.
    16 avr. 2021 à 12 h 15
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 5,418
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
    I don’t get what all these pens fans infatuation with Virtanen are. All while thinking guys like MP and Zucker suck. Virtanen is pretty bad. Zucker only gets a bad rap cause he was on a line with Malkin early in the season who literally brought EVERYONE that was on his line down. That includes players like Bryan Rust too. It wasn’t until about 10-15 games before getting injured did Malkin actually find his game. Zucker has been solid since coming back from his injury.
    pharrow et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    16 avr. 2021 à 12 h 28
    #15
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 19,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
    Quoting: remowilliams
    You are ASSUMING alot of things you have no idea who i am or what i know.IN MY OPINION HE IS NOT A FIT FOR OUR TEAM.thats my logic. This site is based on opinions that is mine TAKE IT.


    no you stated your opinion very clearly.

    "declining play"

    it was not simply "not a fit"

    Be honest.
    You don't watch him. You know nothing about him.
    You clearly didn't look at any stats to actually come to an assumption because if you did you would have seen they are on pace for career highs.
    You simply sheeped along with the rest of what you read on capfriendly.

    You are the typical internet user. Clueless but thinks you must be right because everyone else is doing it.
    remowilliams a aimé ceci.
    16 avr. 2021 à 12 h 38
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2018
    Messages: 2,635
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,167
    Pharrow>YOU ARE An INTERNET BULLY . You have no idea about me,29 pts 12 pts plus this year thatis is declining numbers.Numbers do not lie hes in decline we dont have any interest in him keep him IN MY OPINION BULLY. Easy ignore list.......
    16 avr. 2021 à 13 h 41
    #17
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 19,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
    Quoting: remowilliams
    Pharrow>YOU ARE An INTERNET BULLY . You have no idea about me,29 pts 12 pts plus this year thatis is declining numbers.Numbers do not lie hes in decline we dont have any interest in him keep him IN MY OPINION BULLY. Easy ignore list.......


    you get called out, and then everyone is a "Bully"
    The guy is clearly putting up 5v5 goals at career highs. Which is his role.
    But people are "bully" for pointing it out as you try to warp your own words in your double speak nonsense.
    "i"ll call you a bully because I'm wrong and I can't admit it"
    No wonder Torts calls players a "softer generation" with people like you it's clear why.
    You can't even admit you said he has "declining play"
    Imagine875948 et Billy739 a aimé ceci.
    16 avr. 2021 à 17 h 2
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 5,418
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
    Quoting: remowilliams
    Pharrow>YOU ARE An INTERNET BULLY . You have no idea about me,29 pts 12 pts plus this year thatis is declining numbers.Numbers do not lie hes in decline we dont have any interest in him keep him IN MY OPINION BULLY. Easy ignore list.......


    Ummm Zucker had 29 points with Minnesota last year and 12 points in like 15 games with Pittsburgh for a total of 41 points. He had 42 points the year before that. He’s always been a 40-50 point player that’s usually 20-25 goals a year. Keep in mind too that not only was last year a shortened season. But Minnesota knocked him down to bottom 6 for portions of the season. So he actually was likely having a somewhat of a career year last year. This year as Pharrow said, he is having a career year 5v5. He was playing top pp in Minny, but here is only the 2nd pp unit. Even with all the injuries. So I think you misread his stat line.
    16 avr. 2021 à 19 h 3
    #19
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2021
    Messages: 2,771
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,386
    VAN decline, they don't have the cap space for Zucker and don't want add another lengthy contract.
    remowilliams a aimé ceci.
    16 avr. 2021 à 20 h 28
    #20
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2018
    Messages: 2,635
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,167
    Quoting: Pensfan89
    Ummm Zucker had 29 points with Minnesota last year and 12 points in like 15 games with Pittsburgh for a total of 41 points. He had 42 points the year before that. He’s always been a 40-50 point player that’s usually 20-25 goals a year. Keep in mind too that not only was last year a shortened season. But Minnesota knocked him down to bottom 6 for portions of the season. So he actually was likely having a somewhat of a career year last year. This year as Pharrow said, he is having a career year 5v5. He was playing top pp in Minny, but here is only the 2nd pp unit. Even with all the injuries. So I think you misread his stat line.


    no i didnt Zucker is 29 and on the declining side of his career Louie had a couple of good years before we signed him Look what that got us,were not just looking at this year. my point is were going young.Bo Horvat only makes five hundred thousand more than Zucker is younger and a way better bang for the buck thats what were looking for not a player who is on the down hill side of his career.
    PeterForsberg21 a aimé ceci.
    17 avr. 2021 à 12 h 10
    #21
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 5,418
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
    Quoting: remowilliams
    no i didnt Zucker is 29 and on the declining side of his career Louie had a couple of good years before we signed him Look what that got us,were not just looking at this year. my point is were going young.Bo Horvat only makes five hundred thousand more than Zucker is younger and a way better bang for the buck thats what were looking for not a player who is on the down hill side of his career.


    Zucker is not on the decline of his career. If anything, on the rise and that’s been proven by facts and stats. If you want to be blatantly stupid, by all means continue to embarrass yourself though.
    17 avr. 2021 à 12 h 27
    #22
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2018
    Messages: 2,635
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,167
    Quoting: Pensfan89
    Zucker is not on the decline of his career. If anything, on the rise and that’s been proven by facts and stats. If you want to be blatantly stupid, by all means continue to embarrass yourself though.


    not sure what part you dont understand.were looking for young
    Quoting: Pensfan89
    Zucker is not on the decline of his career. If anything, on the rise and that’s been proven by facts and stats. If you want to be blatantly stupid, by all means continue to embarrass yourself though.


    Not sure what part you dont understand.We would have zero interest in Zucker(WHO IS STILL A GOOD PLAYER) but declining in age and paid 5 million for three years how will his skills be in say two years (maybe another louie contract) hes just not a fit for a young team we are building.In my opinion.
    17 avr. 2021 à 16 h 51
    #23
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 5,418
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
    Quoting: remowilliams
    not sure what part you dont understand.were looking for young

    Not sure what part you dont understand.We would have zero interest in Zucker(WHO IS STILL A GOOD PLAYER) but declining in age and paid 5 million for three years how will his skills be in say two years (maybe another louie contract) hes just not a fit for a young team we are building.In my opinion.


    Zucker isn’t old. Just admit you were wrong rather than continuing to embarrass yourself even worse. First you tried to tell pharrow that his stats were declining. Now it’s suddenly about age to try and save face. You only make yourself look worse lol. Zucker is in the prime of his career and not declining. No matter which ridiculous way you try to spin it because you’re wrong every way.
    But hey if you’re willing to take Virtanen over Zucker (who is way better) just because he is a few years younger. Pens counter with Kasper Bjorkqvist for Bo Horvat straight up. Canucks should accept that since they are going for younger 😂
    18 avr. 2021 à 20 h 45
    #24
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 5,418
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
    Quoting: remowilliams
    ok now the gloves are off. You cant accept my point idiot.We DONT WANT HIM.Its STATS You want Zucker =25 games 6 goals 4 assists 10 points time on ice =15:58 hes 29 years old. He makes 5 MILLION per year.EVEN RODRIGES 27 games 5 goals 5 assists time on ice 15:02 27 years old and he makes 7 HUNDRED THOUSAND per year. who would you choose the older declining player making 5 MILLION per season or the younger player making 7 hundred thousand.Do your home work idiot i did.stop talking out of your rear end.Now run along.im done with your B.S.


    Again..Zucker is not declining. No matter how much you want to embarrass yourself making the same stupid argument because you blatantly want to be stupid, doesn’t make it true lol. Clearly not hard to get worked up either. Of course if I was a Canucks fan, I’d probably get upset easily too. You Canuck fans are quite the riot 😂. I mean ERod has nothing to do with this argument. It’s about Zucker vs Virtanen which thankfully you were brilliant in proving my point that Zucker is MILES better than Virtanen will ever be. 11 points (7 goals) in 27 games now vs 4 points (4 goals) in 32 games. Yeah, I’ll take the guy that scores more and has almost 3 times the points in less games 😂
    18 avr. 2021 à 22 h 39
    #25
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2018
    Messages: 2,635
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,167
    Modifié 18 avr. 2021 à 22 h 44
    Quoting: Pensfan89
    Again..Zucker is not declining. No matter how much you want to embarrass yourself making the same stupid argument because you blatantly want to be stupid, doesn’t make it true lol. Clearly not hard to get worked up either. Of course if I was a Canucks fan, I’d probably get upset easily too. You Canuck fans are quite the riot 😂. I mean ERod has nothing to do with this argument. It’s about Zucker vs Virtanen which thankfully you were brilliant in proving my point that Zucker is MILES better than Virtanen will ever be. 11 points (7 goals) in 27 games now vs 4 points (4 goals) in 32 games. Yeah, I’ll take the guy that scores more and has almost 3 times the points in less games 😂


    seven goals in 27 games super SNIPER.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage