Some of these are Clear Overpays and some are Clear underpays

For example: Washington takes that without a second of hesitation. they would be morons not to
On the other hand. Sens easily reject. I mean thats horrid for them

In saying that, if some of them are accurate, props because its hard to do

Leafs decline lol

Honestly I dont see Buffalo doing that

Marchand as a NMC and would axe a deal to EDM. Krejci is a pending UFA so I'm not sure why you have him in the deal.

I mean, McDavid at $7.5m + 1st and 2nd is pretty insane for value (OTT deal).

That rangers trade is ridiculous.

I dislike the Lightning and Maple Leaf trades the most

Pens say no, Crosby has lead us to 3 cups and I'd like to keep going

edmonton should take that arizona trade, big steal

Sens was hard bc of the lack of proven talent in the NHL



Buffalo would be dumb enough to take it

what sides are better?

Why? Deangelo's contract is 4 million of dead cap, no first rounder and 5.3 is retained

MTL accepts

Both the Lightning and Leafs win those trades easily
Youre trading the top two forwards in the league and the highest goalscoring defenceman in the NHL and in the Norris trophy conversation for 2 overpayed players, a defenceman equal to Nurse, and Auston Matthews, who's essentially an american Draisaitl


For the TBL youre giving McDavid, the best player in the league, RNH, a decent complementary player and Barrie, PP specialist for Hedman, Norris trophy guy and Kuch, who had one amazing season, now that I look at it again though, its more fair than i initaly thought but it still favours the Lightning
Most of the other trades look fine tho

..

RNH is a UFA this offseason

They are still giving up 3 of the best young players in the league and its still an overpay in principle. IK Sanderson isnt in the league yet but u get my point. BIG moves lmao

Not sure what RNH has to do with anything lmao

My bad, was replying to someone else